Kubernetes vs Magnum CI

Overview

Magnum CI

Stacks9

Followers21

Votes17

Kubernetes

Stacks61.2K

Followers52.8K

Votes685

Kubernetes vs Magnum CI: What are the differences?

Kubernetes and Magnum CI are two different technologies commonly used in website development and deployment. While Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform, Magnum CI is a continuous integration and deployment tool. They have several key differences that set them apart from each other.

Architecture: Kubernetes is a highly scalable, containerized platform that allows efficient management and deployment of containerized applications. It provides features like automated scaling, resource allocation, and service discovery. On the other hand, Magnum CI is specifically designed for continuous integration and deployment, focusing on automating the build, test, and deploy processes of software projects.
Scope: Kubernetes is a more comprehensive platform that addresses various aspects of container management, including networking, storage, and security. It provides a rich set of features for orchestrating and managing clusters of containers at scale. In contrast, Magnum CI focuses solely on the continuous integration and deployment part of the software development lifecycle.
Integration: Kubernetes has extensive integration capabilities with other open-source tools and platforms. It can be easily integrated with monitoring systems, logging frameworks, and load balancers to create a complete application deployment stack. Magnum CI, on the other hand, is primarily integrated with version control systems like GitHub and GitLab to automate the build and test processes.
User Interface: Kubernetes has a web-based user interface called Kubernetes Dashboard, which provides a visual representation of the cluster and allows users to manage and monitor containerized applications. Magnum CI, on the other hand, is primarily used through the command line interface (CLI) or through integrations with version control systems, without a dedicated graphical user interface.
Scalability: Kubernetes is designed to scale seamlessly from a single node to thousands of nodes, allowing horizontal scaling of containerized applications. It provides features like automatic load balancing and automatic scaling based on resource utilization. Magnum CI, on the other hand, focuses on the scalability of continuous integration and deployment processes, allowing teams to run multiple builds and deployments in parallel.
Community Support: Kubernetes has a large and active community of developers and contributors, making it one of the most popular container orchestration platforms. It has extensive documentation, online forums, and community-driven support channels. Magnum CI, being a continuous integration and deployment tool, also has a community but is more specific to the CI/CD domain.

In Summary, Kubernetes and Magnum CI differ in terms of their architecture, scope, integration capabilities, user interface, scalability, and community support. Kubernetes is a highly scalable container orchestration platform, while Magnum CI is a specific tool focused on automating continuous integration and deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Magnum CI, Kubernetes

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 27, 2020

Decidedon

GitHub

GitHub Pages

Markdown

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

@{GitHub}|tool:27| (incl. @{GitHub Pages}|tool:683|/@{Markdown}|tool:1147| for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
Respectively @{Git}|tool:1046| as revision control system
@{SourceTree}|tool:1599| as @{Git}|tool:1046| GUI
@{Visual Studio Code}|tool:4202| as IDE
@{CircleCI}|tool:190| for continuous integration (automatize development process)
@{Prettier}|tool:7035| / @{TSLint}|tool:5561| / @{ESLint}|tool:3337| as code linter
@{SonarQube}|tool:2638| as quality gate
@{Docker}|tool:586| as container management (incl. @{Docker Compose}|tool:3136| for multi-container application management)
@{VirtualBox}|tool:774| for operating system simulation tests
@{Kubernetes}|tool:1885| as cluster management for docker containers
@{Heroku}|tool:133| for deploying in test environments
@{nginx}|tool:1052| as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
@{SSLMate}|tool:2752| (using @{OpenSSL}|tool:3091|) for certificate management
@{Amazon EC2}|tool:18| (incl. @{Amazon S3}|tool:25|) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
@{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| as preferred database system
@{Redis}|tool:1031| as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.

12.8M views12.8M

Comments

Anis

Founder at Odix

Nov 7, 2020

Review

I recommend this : -Spring reactive for back end : the fact it's reactive (async) it consumes half of the resources that a sync platform needs (so less CPU -> less money). -Angular : Web Front end ; it's gives you the possibility to use PWA which is a cheap replacement for a mobile app (but more less popular). -Docker images. -Kubernetes to orchestrate all the containers. -I Use Jenkins / blueocean, ansible for my CI/CD (with Github of course) -AWS of course : u can run a K8S cluster there, make it multi AZ (availability zones) to be highly available, use a load balancer and an auto scaler and ur good to go. -You can store data by taking any managed DB or u can deploy ur own (cheap but risky).

You pay less money, but u need some technical 2 - 3 guys to make that done.

Good luck

115k views115k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Magnum CI	Kubernetes
Magnum CI is a hosted continuous integration service for private projects. It supports multiple languages and tools to run test suite. Service supports all major version control software and integrates with most popular code hosting platforms. There are no restrictions or limitations on where you store your source code, so even your own self-hosted repository will work right away.	Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
Easy Integration;Flexible Builds;Code Metrics; Build Notifications	Lightweight, simple and accessible;Built for a multi-cloud world, public, private or hybrid;Highly modular, designed so that all of its components are easily swappable
Statistics
Stacks 9	Stacks 61.2K
Followers 21	Followers 52.8K
Votes 17	Votes 685
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Free 4 Easy setup 3 Github integration 2 Gitlab integration 1 Slack integration	Pros 166 Leading docker container management solution 130 Simple and powerful 108 Open source 76 Backed by google 58 The right abstractions Cons 16 Steep learning curve 15 Poor workflow for development 8 Orchestrates only infrastructure 4 High resource requirements for on-prem clusters 2 Too heavy for simple systems
Integrations
Slack Flowdock HipChat Campfire GitHub Bitbucket Beanstalk	Vagrant Docker Rackspace Cloud Servers Microsoft Azure Google Compute Engine Ansible Google Kubernetes Engine

What are some alternatives to Magnum CI, Kubernetes?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Kubernetes vs Magnum CI: What are the differences?

Architecture: Kubernetes is a highly scalable, containerized platform that allows efficient management and deployment of containerized applications. It provides features like automated scaling, resource allocation, and service discovery. On the other hand, Magnum CI is specifically designed for continuous integration and deployment, focusing on automating the build, test, and deploy processes of software projects.
Scope: Kubernetes is a more comprehensive platform that addresses various aspects of container management, including networking, storage, and security. It provides a rich set of features for orchestrating and managing clusters of containers at scale. In contrast, Magnum CI focuses solely on the continuous integration and deployment part of the software development lifecycle.
Integration: Kubernetes has extensive integration capabilities with other open-source tools and platforms. It can be easily integrated with monitoring systems, logging frameworks, and load balancers to create a complete application deployment stack. Magnum CI, on the other hand, is primarily integrated with version control systems like GitHub and GitLab to automate the build and test processes.
User Interface: Kubernetes has a web-based user interface called Kubernetes Dashboard, which provides a visual representation of the cluster and allows users to manage and monitor containerized applications. Magnum CI, on the other hand, is primarily used through the command line interface (CLI) or through integrations with version control systems, without a dedicated graphical user interface.
Scalability: Kubernetes is designed to scale seamlessly from a single node to thousands of nodes, allowing horizontal scaling of containerized applications. It provides features like automatic load balancing and automatic scaling based on resource utilization. Magnum CI, on the other hand, focuses on the scalability of continuous integration and deployment processes, allowing teams to run multiple builds and deployments in parallel.
Community Support: Kubernetes has a large and active community of developers and contributors, making it one of the most popular container orchestration platforms. It has extensive documentation, online forums, and community-driven support channels. Magnum CI, being a continuous integration and deployment tool, also has a community but is more specific to the CI/CD domain.

Kubernetes vs Magnum CI

Overview