LambdaTest vs Playwright

Overview

LambdaTest

Stacks556

Followers198

Votes204

Playwright

Stacks618

Followers587

Votes81

GitHub Stars79.0K

Forks4.8K

LambdaTest vs Playwright: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between LambdaTest and Playwright, focusing on their unique features and functionalities.

Cross Browser Compatibility Testing: LambdaTest provides a cloud-based platform for cross-browser compatibility testing, allowing developers to test their web applications on a wide range of browsers and operating systems. On the other hand, Playwright is an open-source library that offers cross-browser automation testing, enabling developers to automate their web application tests across different web browsers.
Supported Browsers: LambdaTest supports a comprehensive list of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Internet Explorer, and Opera. It also provides support for their older versions. Playwright, on the other hand, offers support for Chromium (Google Chrome), Firefox, and WebKit (Safari).
Programming Language Support: LambdaTest supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, C#, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, and PHP, allowing developers to write their tests in their preferred programming language. Playwright provides support for multiple programming languages as well, including JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python, providing flexibility and ease of use for developers.
Parallel Testing: LambdaTest allows developers to perform parallel testing, which means running multiple tests simultaneously on different browsers and operating systems. This helps save time and improves the overall testing efficiency. Playwright also supports parallel testing, enabling developers to execute multiple tests in parallel, optimizing testing time and resources.
Browser Contexts: LambdaTest provides support for multiple browser contexts, which allows developers to create isolated browser environments for testing. This enables testing scenarios such as multiple user logins or different sessions on the same browser. Playwright also offers browser contexts, providing developers with the ability to create separate instances of browser environments, ensuring isolated testing and avoiding interference between test cases.
Flexibility and Customization: LambdaTest offers various features for flexibility and customization, such as custom profiles, network conditions, geolocation testing, and local testing. These features allow developers to simulate real-world scenarios and thoroughly test their web applications. Playwright provides flexibility by allowing developers to customize browser options, emulate various devices for mobile testing, and modify network conditions, ensuring comprehensive testing with desired configurations.

In Summary, LambdaTest and Playwright differ in terms of cross-browser compatibility testing, supported browsers, programming language support, parallel testing capabilities, browser contexts, and flexibility in customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LambdaTest	Playwright
LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.	It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.
Selenium Web Automation; Cypress CLI; HyperExecute (70% faster then conventional selenium grid); Test at Scale; Customized Enterprise Solutions; Puppeteer Automation Testing; Playwright Automation Testing; TestCafe Automation Testing; Appium Automation Testing; Espresso Mobile App Testing; On Premise Selenium Grid; Real Time Browser Testing; Real Mobile App Testing; Local host web app testing; Automated Screenshot Generation; Smart Visual UI testing, Visual Regression Testing; Free Responsive testing with LT Browser;Smart Visual UI Testing;Testing Locally Hosted Pages: Lambda Tunnel;	Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 79.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4.8K
Stacks 556	Stacks 618
Followers 198	Followers 587
Votes 204	Votes 81
Pros & Cons
Pros 17 Pocket friendly pricing 13 Good Performance 12 Integration with Bitbucket 12 Cross browser testing 12 Integration with Gitlab Cons 1 Steep learning curve for new users 1 Cluttered UI 1 Limited device support	Pros 15 Cross browser 11 Open source 9 Test Runner with Playwright/test 7 Promise based 7 Well documented Cons 12 Less help 3 Node based 2 Does not execute outside of browser
Integrations
Zoho Bugtracker GitLab Katalon Studio RSpec Jira PractiTest AngularJS JUnit TestCafe Appium	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to LambdaTest, Playwright?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

PhantomJS

PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.

Related Comparisons

LambdaTest vs Playwright: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between LambdaTest and Playwright, focusing on their unique features and functionalities.

Cross Browser Compatibility Testing: LambdaTest provides a cloud-based platform for cross-browser compatibility testing, allowing developers to test their web applications on a wide range of browsers and operating systems. On the other hand, Playwright is an open-source library that offers cross-browser automation testing, enabling developers to automate their web application tests across different web browsers.
Supported Browsers: LambdaTest supports a comprehensive list of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Internet Explorer, and Opera. It also provides support for their older versions. Playwright, on the other hand, offers support for Chromium (Google Chrome), Firefox, and WebKit (Safari).
Programming Language Support: LambdaTest supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, C#, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, and PHP, allowing developers to write their tests in their preferred programming language. Playwright provides support for multiple programming languages as well, including JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python, providing flexibility and ease of use for developers.
Parallel Testing: LambdaTest allows developers to perform parallel testing, which means running multiple tests simultaneously on different browsers and operating systems. This helps save time and improves the overall testing efficiency. Playwright also supports parallel testing, enabling developers to execute multiple tests in parallel, optimizing testing time and resources.
Browser Contexts: LambdaTest provides support for multiple browser contexts, which allows developers to create isolated browser environments for testing. This enables testing scenarios such as multiple user logins or different sessions on the same browser. Playwright also offers browser contexts, providing developers with the ability to create separate instances of browser environments, ensuring isolated testing and avoiding interference between test cases.
Flexibility and Customization: LambdaTest offers various features for flexibility and customization, such as custom profiles, network conditions, geolocation testing, and local testing. These features allow developers to simulate real-world scenarios and thoroughly test their web applications. Playwright provides flexibility by allowing developers to customize browser options, emulate various devices for mobile testing, and modify network conditions, ensuring comprehensive testing with desired configurations.

LambdaTest vs Playwright

Overview