Lighthouse vs WebPageTest

Overview

Lighthouse

Stacks264

Followers191

Votes0

WebPageTest

Stacks6

Followers1

Votes0

Lighthouse vs WebPageTest: What are the differences?

Lighthouse and WebPageTest are two popular tools used for web performance testing and optimization. While they share similarities in their purpose, there are key differences between the two that make them distinct from each other.

Test Execution: Lighthouse is integrated into Google Chrome's Developer Tools, allowing it to be run directly from the browser. It evaluates the performance of a webpage in real-time, providing immediate feedback. WebPageTest, on the other hand, is an online tool that runs performance tests from multiple locations around the world, giving insights about performance under different network conditions.
Metrics: Lighthouse focuses on providing specific metrics related to web performance, such as performance score, time to interactive, and first meaningful paint. It also includes audits for best practices, accessibility, and SEO. WebPageTest, on the contrary, offers a broader set of metrics including load time, time to first byte, and visually complete. It allows users to customize the metrics based on their specific needs.
Network Emulation: Lighthouse only evaluates the performance of a webpage within the current network conditions. It does not provide the option to emulate different network speeds or conditions. WebPageTest, however, allows users to simulate various network environments, enabling them to test how the webpage performs under different scenarios like 3G, 4G, or even offline.
Scripting and Automation: Lighthouse is mainly used for manual testing and provides a user-friendly interface. It does not have built-in support for scripting or automation. On the other hand, WebPageTest offers scripting capabilities, allowing users to automate tests and perform more complex scenarios. This makes it suitable for regression testing and continuous integration.
Detailed Waterfall Analysis: WebPageTest provides a detailed waterfall analysis of the page load, showing the order in which resources are requested and loaded. It helps in identifying bottlenecks and understanding the loading sequence. Lighthouse does not provide a detailed waterfall analysis, focusing more on individual performance metrics and recommendations.
Third-Party Integration: Lighthouse is tightly integrated with Google Chrome and Google's ecosystem, offering seamless integration with other Google developer tools. WebPageTest, on the other hand, provides a public API that can be accessed by third-party tools or services, allowing for greater flexibility and integration possibilities with different systems.

In Summary, Lighthouse is a built-in tool in Chrome Developer Tools that provides real-time performance evaluation and focuses on specific metrics, whereas WebPageTest is an online tool that offers a wider range of metrics, network emulation options, scripting capabilities, and detailed waterfall analysis.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Lighthouse	WebPageTest
Collaborate effortlessly on projects. Whether you’re a team of 5 or studio of 50, Lighthouse will help you keep track of your project development with ease. We give you all the tools you need to organize your tickets – custom states, a powerful tagging system, an advanced search, saved searches (we call them ticket bins), and a mass editing tool.	Speed up the performance of your web pages with an automated analysis
Simplified Navigation- Don't get lost in your issue tracker again;Stay Organized- Group tickets into live queues;Activity Stream- Keep up with your project's progress;Milestones- Keep your project on track;Online Documents- Keep project notes stored online	-
Statistics
Stacks 264	Stacks 6
Followers 191	Followers 1
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Airbrake Bugsnag Pivotal Tracker GitHub New Relic SnapEngage Beanstalk	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Lighthouse, WebPageTest?

Jira

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

Bugify

Bugify offers a simple way of managing issues for your projects.

ZenTao

You can effortlessly stay on top of your product development, create and delegate tasks, test your software, customize, store and secure your documents and more.

Bugzilla

Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

VersionOne

It is a formidable Agile management solution that is both comprehensive and versatile and developed for teams and projects of various scope and size. It is a compact platform that delivers outstanding performance in terms of managing and tracking multiple teams, tasks, and projects.

Mantis

It is a free web-based bug tracking system. It provides a delicate balance between simplicity and power. Users are able to get started in minutes and start managing their projects while collaborating with their teammates and clients effectively.

YouTrack

A project management tool that can be adapted to your processes to help you deliver great products. Track tasks and bugs, plan sprints and releases, create workflows, and customize for your business processes.

GitPulse

Free AI-powered GitHub repository analytics and open source discovery platform. Analyze repositories, find good first issues, compare projects, and discover contribution opportunities. 500+ curated issues for beginners. Real-time commit analysis and contributor insights.

Linear

It helps streamline software projects, sprints, tasks, and bug tracking. It's built for high-performance teams. Any action can be accessed and completed in seconds with the command menu.

Azure Boards

Keep your agile project on track with it where you can track all your ideas at every development stage, use built-in scrum boards and planning tools to help your teams run sprints/stand-ups/planning meetings, and gain new insights into the health and status of your project with powerful analytics tools.

Related Comparisons

Lighthouse vs WebPageTest: What are the differences?

Test Execution: Lighthouse is integrated into Google Chrome's Developer Tools, allowing it to be run directly from the browser. It evaluates the performance of a webpage in real-time, providing immediate feedback. WebPageTest, on the other hand, is an online tool that runs performance tests from multiple locations around the world, giving insights about performance under different network conditions.
Metrics: Lighthouse focuses on providing specific metrics related to web performance, such as performance score, time to interactive, and first meaningful paint. It also includes audits for best practices, accessibility, and SEO. WebPageTest, on the contrary, offers a broader set of metrics including load time, time to first byte, and visually complete. It allows users to customize the metrics based on their specific needs.
Network Emulation: Lighthouse only evaluates the performance of a webpage within the current network conditions. It does not provide the option to emulate different network speeds or conditions. WebPageTest, however, allows users to simulate various network environments, enabling them to test how the webpage performs under different scenarios like 3G, 4G, or even offline.
Scripting and Automation: Lighthouse is mainly used for manual testing and provides a user-friendly interface. It does not have built-in support for scripting or automation. On the other hand, WebPageTest offers scripting capabilities, allowing users to automate tests and perform more complex scenarios. This makes it suitable for regression testing and continuous integration.
Detailed Waterfall Analysis: WebPageTest provides a detailed waterfall analysis of the page load, showing the order in which resources are requested and loaded. It helps in identifying bottlenecks and understanding the loading sequence. Lighthouse does not provide a detailed waterfall analysis, focusing more on individual performance metrics and recommendations.
Third-Party Integration: Lighthouse is tightly integrated with Google Chrome and Google's ecosystem, offering seamless integration with other Google developer tools. WebPageTest, on the other hand, provides a public API that can be accessed by third-party tools or services, allowing for greater flexibility and integration possibilities with different systems.

Lighthouse vs WebPageTest

Overview