Localazy vs Lokalise: What are the differences?

Localazy and Lokalise are both translation management platforms that offer various features to help businesses localize their websites and apps. However, there are key differences between the two platforms that make them unique in their own ways.

1. Pricing Model: Localazy offers a unique pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the actual translations they use. This can be particularly advantageous for smaller businesses or projects with limited budgets, as they can avoid paying for unused translations or monthly subscription fees. On the other hand, Lokalise follows a subscription-based pricing model, which may be more suitable for larger enterprises or projects with high translation volumes, as it allows for unlimited translations within a fixed monthly fee.

2. Integration Options: Localazy provides a seamless integration with various project management tools and platforms, such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and Jira. This makes it easier for developers to manage and automate the localization process within their existing workflows. Meanwhile, Lokalise also offers integrations with popular platforms like GitHub, but it goes a step further by providing integrations with design tools like Figma and Sketch, allowing designers and developers to work together in a more streamlined manner.

3. Translation Quality Assurance: Localazy offers a comprehensive translation quality assurance system, which includes built-in tools for spell checking, grammar checks, and consistency checks. This helps ensure the accuracy and consistency of translations, reducing the need for manual review and corrections. Lokalise also provides quality assurance features, but it focuses more on collaborative review processes, allowing teams to leave comments, suggest changes, and track translation progress.

4. Machine Translation Integration: Localazy integrates with popular machine translation services like Google Translate and DeepL, allowing users to leverage machine translation for faster and cost-effective translations. This can be particularly useful for projects with tight deadlines or a large volume of content. On the contrary, while Lokalise doesn't have built-in machine translation integration, it offers the option to connect with external translation engines via the API, providing flexibility for users to choose their preferred machine translation services.

5. Developer-Friendly Features: Localazy puts a strong emphasis on developer-friendly features, such as over-the-air (OTA) translation updates, which allow developers to make changes to translations without recompiling the code or releasing a new version of the app. This can save time and effort in the localization process. Lokalise also provides similar features like in-context editing, which allows translators to see how the translations will appear in the final product, and pull request support, making it easy for developers to review and merge translation updates.

6. Community Translation Support: Localazy offers a unique community translation feature, where users can crowdsource translations from their own user base or a selected group of volunteers. This can be a cost-effective way to gather translations for less popular languages or niche content. Lokalise, on the other hand, does not have a built-in community translation feature but provides functionality for managing external contributors and freelancers, helping users collaborate with their own translation teams.

In Summary, Localazy offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, seamless integrations with project management tools, comprehensive translation quality assurance, machine translation integration, developer-friendly features, and community translation support. On the other hand, Lokalise follows a subscription-based pricing model, provides integrations with design tools, emphasizes collaborative review processes, offers external machine translation integration, has developer-friendly features like in-context editing and pull request support, and supports managing external contributors.