1. Integration Ease: Localazy offers a simpler integration process with efficient SDKs and automatic string extraction compared to Smartling. This makes it easier for developers to seamlessly implement localization into their apps.
2. Translation Quality: Smartling provides professional translation services through its network of human translators, ensuring high-quality and accurate translations. On the other hand, Localazy primarily relies on machine translations for faster results, which may not always guarantee the same level of quality.
3. Cost Structure: Localazy follows a user-friendly pricing model based on the lines of code and active users, making it more cost-effective for smaller projects compared to Smartling's more complex pricing structure, which can be expensive for startups and small businesses.
4. Collaboration Tools: Smartling offers a range of collaboration tools such as in-context editing and workflow management features for teams to work together efficiently on translations. Localazy, on the other hand, lacks some of these advanced collaboration tools, making it less ideal for larger localization projects requiring extensive teamwork.
5. Platform Support: Smartling supports a wide range of platforms and file formats, allowing users to localize various types of content. Localazy, on the other hand, has limited platform support, focusing mainly on mobile app localization, which may not be suitable for users working across multiple platforms.
6. Customer Support: Smartling provides dedicated support through a team of experts to assist users with any issues or questions they may have. Localazy, while offering customer support, may not have the same level of personalized assistance as Smartling, making it potentially less responsive to user queries.

In Summary, Localazy and Smartling differ in integration ease, translation quality, cost structure, collaboration tools, platform support, and customer support, catering to different needs and preferences in the localization industry.