StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material UI vs Next.js

Material UI vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Material UI vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Differences between Material UI and Next.js

  1. Server-side rendering capabilities: Next.js is a framework that supports server-side rendering out of the box, meaning that the initial HTML is generated on the server and sent to the client, providing better performance and SEO. On the other hand, Material UI is a UI component library that focuses on providing pre-built, styled components for web development, but it doesn't have built-in server-side rendering capabilities.

  2. Development approach: Material UI is primarily focused on providing a rich set of reusable React components that follow the Material Design guidelines. It allows developers to quickly scaffold a visually appealing UI. On the other hand, Next.js is a full-fledged framework that provides a structure for building complete web applications, handling routing, server-side rendering, and other aspects.

  3. Styling options: Material UI provides ready-to-use stylized components that follow the Material Design principles, enabling developers to achieve a consistent and visually appealing UI easily. It also offers styling options like inline styles and CSS-in-JS libraries. In contrast, Next.js doesn't focus specifically on styling and leaves it up to the developer to choose the styling approach they prefer, such as CSS modules or CSS libraries.

  4. Community and ecosystem: Material UI has a vibrant community and a large ecosystem of plugins and extensions that developers can leverage to enhance their projects. It offers comprehensive documentation and regular updates. On the other hand, Next.js also has a growing community, but it is more focused on the Next.js specific features and best practices.

  5. Learning curve: Material UI provides a set of pre-built components with ready-to-use styles, making it relatively easy to start developing a visually appealing UI, especially for developers already familiar with React. However, learning how to use Next.js requires understanding the framework's concepts and features, which can have a steeper learning curve.

  6. Use case: Material UI is primarily used for designing and developing user interfaces, providing a wide range of customizable components suitable for building modern web applications. Next.js, on the other hand, is a framework that is more suitable for developing complete web applications, including server-side rendering, routing, and other essential features. It provides a higher level of abstraction and a structure for building scalable and production-ready applications.

In summary, Material UI provides pre-built, styled components for user interface design, whereas Next.js is a framework that focuses on providing a complete structure for building web applications, including server-side rendering capabilities. Material UI is more focused on UI design, while Next.js provides a comprehensive framework for web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Fronted
Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k
Comments
Xinyi
Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
Next.js
Next.js

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
3.7K
Followers
5.1K
Votes
445
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
React
React

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase