Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material UI vs Next.js: What are the differences?
Differences between Material UI and Next.js
Server-side rendering capabilities: Next.js is a framework that supports server-side rendering out of the box, meaning that the initial HTML is generated on the server and sent to the client, providing better performance and SEO. On the other hand, Material UI is a UI component library that focuses on providing pre-built, styled components for web development, but it doesn't have built-in server-side rendering capabilities.
Development approach: Material UI is primarily focused on providing a rich set of reusable React components that follow the Material Design guidelines. It allows developers to quickly scaffold a visually appealing UI. On the other hand, Next.js is a full-fledged framework that provides a structure for building complete web applications, handling routing, server-side rendering, and other aspects.
Styling options: Material UI provides ready-to-use stylized components that follow the Material Design principles, enabling developers to achieve a consistent and visually appealing UI easily. It also offers styling options like inline styles and CSS-in-JS libraries. In contrast, Next.js doesn't focus specifically on styling and leaves it up to the developer to choose the styling approach they prefer, such as CSS modules or CSS libraries.
Community and ecosystem: Material UI has a vibrant community and a large ecosystem of plugins and extensions that developers can leverage to enhance their projects. It offers comprehensive documentation and regular updates. On the other hand, Next.js also has a growing community, but it is more focused on the Next.js specific features and best practices.
Learning curve: Material UI provides a set of pre-built components with ready-to-use styles, making it relatively easy to start developing a visually appealing UI, especially for developers already familiar with React. However, learning how to use Next.js requires understanding the framework's concepts and features, which can have a steeper learning curve.
Use case: Material UI is primarily used for designing and developing user interfaces, providing a wide range of customizable components suitable for building modern web applications. Next.js, on the other hand, is a framework that is more suitable for developing complete web applications, including server-side rendering, routing, and other essential features. It provides a higher level of abstraction and a structure for building scalable and production-ready applications.
In summary, Material UI provides pre-built, styled components for user interface design, whereas Next.js is a framework that focuses on providing a complete structure for building web applications, including server-side rendering capabilities. Material UI is more focused on UI design, while Next.js provides a comprehensive framework for web development.
Hi, I start building an admin dashboard with next.js and looking for a frontend framework ( components ready ). So I end up with Ant Design and Material-UI, but I never built a project with these two.
Here is a list of my requirements.
- Good documentation.
- easy CRUD ( date picker and date range picker bundled )
- built-in multi-lang feature or Great 3rd library support
- Admin dashboard template
- well code maintenance
Which is better for the long run?
I'm using both of them. But If you want to create admin dashboard, You should try AntDesign. They (Alibaba / Taobao) created a group of UI libaries to create admin dashboard. It's production ready. https://procomponents.ant.design/en-US/components/table https://pro.ant.design/docs/layout In my opinion, If you want to create a dashboard with mobile first / simple dashboard, you can choice material ui. otherwise, antdesign is better (if you want focus on desktop /tablet ui). Some of skeleton has built with material ui such as react-admin is good point to start. But if you want to create admin site with antdesign, I think you should build with umijs (it is alternative and compatible with nextjs and antd support directlly)
https://github.com/uber/baseweb I highly recommend you baseweb, it's easy and very customizable and also beautiful.
We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.
You can read all about it in our linked blog post.
As our team will be building a web application, HTML5
and CSS3
are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI
comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS
. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.
https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085
Pros of Material-UI
- React141
- Material Design82
- Ui components60
- CSS framework30
- Component25
- Looks great14
- Responsive12
- Good documentation12
- LESS9
- Ui component8
- Open source7
- Code examples6
- Flexible6
- JSS5
- Angular3
- Very accessible3
- Fun3
- Supports old browsers out of the box3
- Typescript support2
- # of components2
- Interface2
- Designed for Server Side Rendering2
- Support for multiple styling systems1
- Css1
- Easy to work with1
- Accessibility1
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting49
- Built with React43
- Easy setup33
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material-UI
- Hard to learn. Bad documentation34
- Hard to customize27
- Hard to understand Docs20
- Bad performance7
- Extra library needed for date/time pickers6
- For editable table component need to use material-table6
- Typescript Support1
- # of components0
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9