StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Minio vs OpenEBS

Minio vs OpenEBS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Minio
Minio
Stacks637
Followers670
Votes43
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks6.4K
OpenEBS
OpenEBS
Stacks28
Followers87
Votes40
GitHub Stars9.5K
Forks972

Minio vs OpenEBS: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code presents the key differences between Minio and OpenEBS.

1. Deployment Method: Minio is a lightweight, cloud-native object storage server that can be deployed as a standalone application or as a distributed system across multiple nodes. OpenEBS, on the other hand, is a containerized storage solution that integrates with orchestration platforms like Kubernetes.

2. Storage Type: Minio primarily focuses on providing scalable object storage, offering features like data integrity checks and erasure coding. OpenEBS, on the other hand, offers block storage through containerized storage engines, enabling features like data replication, snapshots, and volume resizing.

3. Support for Protocols: Minio supports object storage protocols like Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage, allowing seamless integration with existing cloud storage services. OpenEBS supports block storage protocols like iSCSI and NBD, making it suitable for applications that require direct access to block devices.

4. Architecture: Minio follows a distributed, eventually-consistent architecture, where data is replicated across multiple nodes. OpenEBS follows a distributed, strongly-consistent architecture, ensuring data consistency across distributed storage engines.

5. Data Management: While Minio primarily focuses on providing object storage, OpenEBS offers advanced data management features like replication, snapshots, and high availability. OpenEBS also provides features like thin provisioning and dynamic storage allocation.

6. Community and Ecosystem: Minio has a large community and ecosystem, with extensive documentation, client libraries, and integrations with various tools and platforms. OpenEBS also has an active community and growing ecosystem, with support from the CNCF (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) and a range of storage engines to choose from.

In summary, Minio is a lightweight object storage server that supports cloud storage protocols, while OpenEBS is a containerized storage solution that provides advanced block storage features and integrates with Kubernetes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Minio, OpenEBS

Dalton
Dalton

Oct 23, 2020

Decided

Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.

143k views143k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Minio
Minio
OpenEBS
OpenEBS

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

-
Open source; Block Storage; dynamic and static PV/PVC provisioning; CSI Support; raw block devices; snapshots; clones; thin-provisioning; volume grow; volume shrink; multiple file system choices; DR with S3 backup and restore; data persistency across nodes; synchronization of data across cloud availability zones; supported stacks includes OpenShift; Rancher; IBM Cloud Private; Kontena; Kublr; Giant Swarm; Loodse; Docker; Kubernetes; AWS; Azure; Google Cloud; Digital Ocean
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Stars
9.5K
GitHub Forks
6.4K
GitHub Forks
972
Stacks
637
Stacks
28
Followers
670
Followers
87
Votes
43
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Store and Serve Resumes & Job Description PDF, Backups
  • 8
    S3 Compatible
  • 4
    Open Source
  • 4
    Simple
  • 3
    Lambda Compute
Cons
  • 3
    Deletion of huge buckets is not possible
Pros
  • 7
    Great support on Slack
  • 6
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    In user space
  • 5
    Container attached storage
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Grafana
Grafana
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Prometheus
Prometheus
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Rancher
Rancher
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
Helm
Helm
Azure Kubernetes Service
Azure Kubernetes Service

What are some alternatives to Minio, OpenEBS?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase