Pathfinder vs Postman: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code will outline the key differences between Pathfinder and Postman.

1. **Interface**: Pathfinder offers a more visually appealing and user-friendly interface compared to Postman, with better organization of requests and features for smoother navigation. 
2. **Authentication**: Postman provides more comprehensive options for handling different types of authentication methods like OAuth, Basic Auth, and API keys, whereas Pathfinder has fewer authentication options and may require additional configurations for certain authentication types.
3. **Testing Environments**: Postman allows users to easily create and switch between multiple testing environments for different scenarios, whereas Pathfinder may have limitations in managing and switching between environments efficiently. 
4. **Collaboration Tools**: Postman offers robust collaboration features such as team workspaces, version control, and role-based access control, whereas Pathfinder may lack these advanced collaboration tools, making it more suitable for individual use rather than team collaboration.
5. **Automation Capabilities**: Postman provides extensive automation capabilities through its built-in scripts and integrations with popular CI/CD tools, making it a preferred choice for automated testing and continuous integration workflows, while Pathfinder may have limited automation features.
6. **Documentation Generation**: Postman excels in generating detailed API documentation from created requests, complete with examples and descriptions, whereas Pathfinder may have limitations in generating comprehensive and user-friendly API documentation directly from the tool.

In Summary, the key differences between Pathfinder and Postman lie in their interface design, authentication options, testing environments, collaboration tools, automation capabilities, and documentation generation.