StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. PHP CodeSniffer vs RuboCop

PHP CodeSniffer vs RuboCop

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RuboCop
RuboCop
Stacks1.4K
Followers222
Votes41
PHP CodeSniffer
PHP CodeSniffer
Stacks43
Followers43
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.8K
Forks1.5K

PHP CodeSniffer vs RuboCop: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between PHP CodeSniffer and RuboCop

PHP CodeSniffer and RuboCop are static analysis tools that enforce coding style and best practices in PHP and Ruby code respectively. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two tools.

  1. Language: The most obvious difference is that PHP CodeSniffer is designed for PHP code, while RuboCop is specifically built for Ruby code. This means that PHP developers should use CodeSniffer to analyze their PHP code, and Ruby developers should use RuboCop for their Ruby code.

  2. Community Support: PHP CodeSniffer has a larger and more active community compared to RuboCop. This means that there are more available rulesets and a wider range of plugins and extensions for CodeSniffer. RuboCop, on the other hand, has a smaller community but is still well-maintained and widely used in the Ruby community.

  3. Rule Configuration: PHP CodeSniffer and RuboCop have different approaches to rule configuration. CodeSniffer uses a configuration file (phpcs.xml) where developers can specify which rules to enable or disable. RuboCop, on the other hand, uses a .rubocop.yml file where developers can configure the specific cops (rules) and their severity level.

  4. Rule Customization: Both tools provide options for customizing rules, but the level of customization differs. PHP CodeSniffer allows developers to create custom rules from scratch using PHP code, providing more flexibility. RuboCop, on the other hand, offers limited customization options through its configuration file, making it less flexible in terms of rule creation.

  5. Integration with IDEs: PHP CodeSniffer has better integration with popular IDEs like PhpStorm, Visual Studio Code, and Sublime Text. It offers real-time feedback and can be seamlessly integrated into the development workflow, making it easier for developers to adhere to coding standards. RuboCop, while also offering IDE integration, may have limited support or require additional setup in certain IDEs.

  6. Supported Frameworks: PHP CodeSniffer provides out-of-the-box support for a wide range of PHP frameworks, such as Laravel, Symfony, and WordPress. It comes with pre-configured rulesets tailored to each framework's coding standards. RuboCop, on the other hand, is more focused on Ruby itself and may require additional setup or ruleset customization for specific frameworks.

In summary, the key differences between PHP CodeSniffer and RuboCop lie in the languages they support, the size and activity of their communities, the approach to rule configuration and customization, integration with IDEs, and the out-of-the-box support for popular frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on RuboCop, PHP CodeSniffer

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a #linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

RuboCop
RuboCop
PHP CodeSniffer
PHP CodeSniffer

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

It tokenizes PHP, JavaScript and CSS files and detects violations of a defined set of coding standards. It is an essential development tool that ensures your code remains clean and consistent.

-
Code Sniffing; Coding Standard Checking; Coding Standard Fixing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
10.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
43
Followers
222
Followers
43
Votes
41
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Completely free
  • 7
    Runs Offline
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 4
    Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to RuboCop, PHP CodeSniffer?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana