Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Pipe Dream Laravel vs Postman: What are the differences?
Introduction
Pipe Dream Laravel and Postman are two popular tools used in web development. While both tools serve the purpose of testing APIs, they have some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Pipe Dream Laravel and Postman.
Creating API Documentation: Pipe Dream Laravel provides a feature to automatically generate API documentation based on the Laravel routes defined in the code. It extracts information from the code and generates a documentation website with detailed information about each endpoint. On the other hand, Postman does not provide this feature, and API documentation needs to be created and maintained manually.
Collaboration and Team Work: Pipe Dream Laravel is designed to facilitate collaboration and team work. It allows multiple team members to work together on the API documentation, making it easy to maintain and update the documentation as the project evolves. On the other hand, although Postman provides collaboration features, it focuses more on individual usage and does not offer the same level of team collaboration and synchronization.
Code Generation: Pipe Dream Laravel allows developers to generate code snippets in multiple programming languages based on the defined API endpoints. This can be useful when building client code to consume the API. On the contrary, Postman does not provide code generation capabilities, and developers need to manually write the code based on the API specification.
Integration with Laravel: Pipe Dream Laravel is specifically designed for Laravel applications. It integrates seamlessly with Laravel's routing system, allowing developers to define and update API endpoints directly in their Laravel code. Postman, on the other hand, is a standalone tool that can be used with any API, regardless of the framework or programming language used.
Response Validation: Pipe Dream Laravel provides built-in support for response validation. It allows developers to define the expected structure and data types of the API responses, and automatically validates the responses against these definitions. Postman also provides response validation, but it requires manual configuration and does not have the same level of integration with the backend code as Pipe Dream Laravel.
Automated Testing: Pipe Dream Laravel offers automated testing capabilities for API endpoints. It allows developers to write test cases directly in the code, and provides a framework for running these tests and reporting the results. On the other side, Postman has a separate testing feature, where developers can write and run tests for API endpoints. However, it does not have the same tight integration with the backend code as Pipe Dream Laravel.
In summary, Pipe Dream Laravel is a specialized tool for Laravel applications, providing features like automatic API documentation generation, code generation, and seamless integration with Laravel's routing system. On the other hand, Postman is a standalone tool that offers collaboration, testing, and validation capabilities for APIs, but lacks some of the specific features provided by Pipe Dream Laravel.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Pipe Dream Laravel
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Pipe Dream Laravel
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1