StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Pipedream vs Stackato

Pipedream vs Stackato

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Stackato
Stackato
Stacks11
Followers25
Votes2
Pipedream
Pipedream
Stacks38
Followers54
Votes0

Pipedream vs Stackato: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will outline the key differences between Pipedream and Stackato, providing specific details to aid in decision-making for website deployment.

  1. Deployment Flexibility: Pipedream offers more flexibility in deployment methods, allowing users to deploy their workflows as serverless functions or containers. On the other hand, Stackato primarily focuses on containerized deployments, limiting the deployment options available.

  2. Workflow Automation: Pipedream excels in workflow automation with its visual editor for creating and managing workflows, making it suitable for users without extensive coding knowledge. Stackato, on the other hand, provides robust automation capabilities but may require more technical expertise to set up complex workflows efficiently.

  3. Scaling Capabilities: Stackato is renowned for its seamless scalability, offering easy horizontal scaling options to accommodate increased workloads without downtime. In comparison, Pipedream's scaling options are more limited, especially for advanced scalability requirements.

  4. Middleware Support: Stackato provides comprehensive support for various middleware technologies like databases, message queues, and caching solutions, catering to diverse application requirements. Pipedream, although competent in many scenarios, may lack extensive middleware support crucial for certain complex applications.

  5. Pricing Model: Pipedream follows a more transparent pricing model with clear pricing tiers based on usage, making it easier for users to estimate costs. Stackato's pricing, while competitive, may involve more customization and negotiation based on specific enterprise needs, potentially leading to more complex pricing structures.

  6. Community Support: Stackato benefits from strong community support, with a wealth of resources, forums, and user groups available for troubleshooting and sharing best practices. Pipedream, while growing in popularity, may not have as extensive a community presence for users seeking community-driven solutions and support.

In Summary, the key differences between Pipedream and Stackato lie in deployment flexibility, workflow automation tools, scaling capabilities, middleware support, pricing models, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Stackato
Stackato
Pipedream
Pipedream

Stackato runs on top of your cloud infrastructure, and is the middleware from which your applications are launched. Developers simply upload their application source files to Stackato via IDE or command-line. Stackato automatically configures the required language runtimes, web frameworks, and data and messaging services.

It is an integration platform for developers to build and run workflows that integrate apps, data, and APIs — no servers or infrastructure to manage.

Web console; Activity timeline; Multi-tenancy; App store; LDAP support; Oracle support; Amazon RDS integration; Self-service for developers; Uses buildpack; One-click SSO for deploys apps; Log streaming; Availability zones and placement zones support; Auto-scaling of app instances; Auto-scaling at infrastructure layer; Runs on vSphere, OpenStack, CloudStack, AWS, Rackspace, KVM, Virtualbox, VMware Fusion
Run any Node.js code, or use pre-built actions; Create, share, and fork workflows from the community; Send data to S3, Snowflake, email, SSE, and more; Send data to the Pipedream data warehouse, run SQL on it for free
Statistics
Stacks
11
Stacks
38
Followers
25
Followers
54
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Compliance - Owning the data helps with SOX, etc
No community feedback yet
Integrations
OpenStack
OpenStack
Apache CloudStack
Apache CloudStack
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Docker
Docker
Node.js
Node.js
Discord
Discord
Snowflake
Snowflake
Slack
Slack
Shopify
Shopify
Amazon S3
Amazon S3

What are some alternatives to Stackato, Pipedream?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase