Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Playwright

461
550
+ 1
77
Selenide

57
85
+ 1
16
Add tool

Playwright vs Selenide: What are the differences?

Introduction

Playwright and Selenide are both powerful automation tools for web testing. However, there are key differences between them that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Programming Language Support: Playwright is a tool that supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, and C#. On the other hand, Selenide is primarily focused on supporting Java.

  2. Browser Support: Playwright provides robust cross-browser support, allowing you to automate tests on Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit browsers. Selenide, on the other hand, is mainly focused on Selenium WebDriver, which supports a wide range of browsers but may not provide the same level of support for newer or less popular browsers.

  3. Wait Mechanism: Playwright offers powerful built-in waiting mechanisms that can automatically wait for specific conditions before proceeding with the test execution. Selenide also provides similar wait mechanisms but requires additional configurations and settings to achieve the same level of functionality.

  4. Speed and Performance: Playwright is known for its speed and performance, as it utilizes browser-native automation features and has a more lightweight architecture. Selenide, on the other hand, relies on Selenium WebDriver, which can sometimes introduce additional overhead and impact the performance of test execution.

  5. Ease of Use and Documentation: Playwright is designed to have an intuitive and user-friendly API, which makes it easier to write and maintain tests. It also has extensive documentation and a vibrant community that actively contributes to its improvement. Selenide also aims for simplicity and ease of use, but its documentation and community support may not be as comprehensive as Playwright.

  6. Cross-platform Support: Playwright provides excellent cross-platform support, allowing you to write and execute tests on Windows, Mac, and Linux operating systems. Selenide is primarily developed for Java, which means it may have limitations when it comes to cross-platform compatibility.

In Summary, Playwright offers broader programming language support, better cross-browser compatibility, more robust waiting mechanisms, improved speed and performance, better ease of use and documentation, and excellent cross-platform support compared to Selenide.

Advice on Playwright and Selenide
Needs advice
on
CypressCypressSelenideSelenide
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
PlaywrightPlaywright

You should also definitely look into Playwright, which is a new automation tool from Microsoft building on top of the Puppeteer experience and trying to bring this experience in the cross browser space - very exciting project. Great team. Also CodeceptJS as already Playwright support which at a ton of valuable features on top of Playwright, give it a go!

See more
Jinesh Khimsaria
Test Automation Specialist at Personal · | 3 upvotes · 75.2K views
Recommends
on
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO

I'm also looking for the same, FE: React & BE: NodeJS. Cypress won't help as it lacks cross-browser testing, it doesn't support all the browsers. I'm still investigating it, but looks like WebdriverIO may fulfil what I'm looking for - Cross-browser testing, integration with CI/CD, running it as a docker service, good support on assertions & reporting of test results. Let me know if you found any information on any of the above mentioned points.

See more
Recommends
on
CodeceptJSCodeceptJS

Hi Esther, if you really need cross OS and cross device automation Cypress wont help, with WebdriverIO you can do it … and check out CodeceptJS, which is a wrapper around several frameworks (like WebdriverIO) and will support future players (currently for example upcoming Playwright) as well.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Playwright
Pros of Selenide
  • 14
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Fastest
  • 5
    Nice JAVA API
  • 2
    Very mature API
  • 2
    File upload support
  • 2
    Integrated with WebDriverManager project
  • 2
    Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework
  • 1
    Capture screen shots on fail
  • 1
    Cross browser
  • 1
    Proxy server

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Playwright
Cons of Selenide
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser
  • 1
    Hybrid page model not possible

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Playwright?

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

What is Selenide?

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Playwright?
What companies use Selenide?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Playwright?
What tools integrate with Selenide?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Playwright and Selenide?
Puppeteer
Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Protractor
Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
Cypress
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
TestCafe
It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.
See all alternatives