StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Playwright vs Selenide

Playwright vs Selenide

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenide
Selenide
Stacks56
Followers85
Votes16
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Playwright
Playwright
Stacks613
Followers586
Votes81
GitHub Stars79.0K
Forks4.8K

Playwright vs Selenide: What are the differences?

Introduction

Playwright and Selenide are both powerful automation tools for web testing. However, there are key differences between them that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Programming Language Support: Playwright is a tool that supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, and C#. On the other hand, Selenide is primarily focused on supporting Java.

  2. Browser Support: Playwright provides robust cross-browser support, allowing you to automate tests on Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit browsers. Selenide, on the other hand, is mainly focused on Selenium WebDriver, which supports a wide range of browsers but may not provide the same level of support for newer or less popular browsers.

  3. Wait Mechanism: Playwright offers powerful built-in waiting mechanisms that can automatically wait for specific conditions before proceeding with the test execution. Selenide also provides similar wait mechanisms but requires additional configurations and settings to achieve the same level of functionality.

  4. Speed and Performance: Playwright is known for its speed and performance, as it utilizes browser-native automation features and has a more lightweight architecture. Selenide, on the other hand, relies on Selenium WebDriver, which can sometimes introduce additional overhead and impact the performance of test execution.

  5. Ease of Use and Documentation: Playwright is designed to have an intuitive and user-friendly API, which makes it easier to write and maintain tests. It also has extensive documentation and a vibrant community that actively contributes to its improvement. Selenide also aims for simplicity and ease of use, but its documentation and community support may not be as comprehensive as Playwright.

  6. Cross-platform Support: Playwright provides excellent cross-platform support, allowing you to write and execute tests on Windows, Mac, and Linux operating systems. Selenide is primarily developed for Java, which means it may have limitations when it comes to cross-platform compatibility.

In Summary, Playwright offers broader programming language support, better cross-browser compatibility, more robust waiting mechanisms, improved speed and performance, better ease of use and documentation, and excellent cross-platform support compared to Selenide.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenide, Playwright

Esther
Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceonreact-testing-libraryreact-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenide
Selenide
Playwright
Playwright

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
79.0K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
56
Stacks
613
Followers
85
Followers
586
Votes
16
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Nice JAVA API
  • 2
    Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework
  • 2
    File upload support
  • 2
    Integrated with WebDriverManager project
  • 2
    Very mature API
Cons
  • 1
    Hybrid page model not possible
Pros
  • 15
    Cross browser
  • 11
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 7
    Promise based
Cons
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser
Integrations
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android Studio
Android Studio
Selendroid
Selendroid
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Selenide, Playwright?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana