Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Playwright vs Selenide: What are the differences?
Introduction
Playwright and Selenide are both powerful automation tools for web testing. However, there are key differences between them that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.
Programming Language Support: Playwright is a tool that supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, and C#. On the other hand, Selenide is primarily focused on supporting Java.
Browser Support: Playwright provides robust cross-browser support, allowing you to automate tests on Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit browsers. Selenide, on the other hand, is mainly focused on Selenium WebDriver, which supports a wide range of browsers but may not provide the same level of support for newer or less popular browsers.
Wait Mechanism: Playwright offers powerful built-in waiting mechanisms that can automatically wait for specific conditions before proceeding with the test execution. Selenide also provides similar wait mechanisms but requires additional configurations and settings to achieve the same level of functionality.
Speed and Performance: Playwright is known for its speed and performance, as it utilizes browser-native automation features and has a more lightweight architecture. Selenide, on the other hand, relies on Selenium WebDriver, which can sometimes introduce additional overhead and impact the performance of test execution.
Ease of Use and Documentation: Playwright is designed to have an intuitive and user-friendly API, which makes it easier to write and maintain tests. It also has extensive documentation and a vibrant community that actively contributes to its improvement. Selenide also aims for simplicity and ease of use, but its documentation and community support may not be as comprehensive as Playwright.
Cross-platform Support: Playwright provides excellent cross-platform support, allowing you to write and execute tests on Windows, Mac, and Linux operating systems. Selenide is primarily developed for Java, which means it may have limitations when it comes to cross-platform compatibility.
In Summary, Playwright offers broader programming language support, better cross-browser compatibility, more robust waiting mechanisms, improved speed and performance, better ease of use and documentation, and excellent cross-platform support compared to Selenide.
Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!
You should also definitely look into Playwright, which is a new automation tool from Microsoft building on top of the Puppeteer experience and trying to bring this experience in the cross browser space - very exciting project. Great team. Also CodeceptJS as already Playwright support which at a ton of valuable features on top of Playwright, give it a go!
I'm also looking for the same, FE: React & BE: NodeJS. Cypress won't help as it lacks cross-browser testing, it doesn't support all the browsers. I'm still investigating it, but looks like WebdriverIO may fulfil what I'm looking for - Cross-browser testing, integration with CI/CD, running it as a docker service, good support on assertions & reporting of test results. Let me know if you found any information on any of the above mentioned points.
Hi Esther, if you really need cross OS and cross device automation Cypress wont help, with WebdriverIO you can do it … and check out CodeceptJS, which is a wrapper around several frameworks (like WebdriverIO) and will support future players (currently for example upcoming Playwright) as well.
Pros of Playwright
- Cross browser14
- Open source10
- Test Runner with Playwright/test9
- Promise based7
- Well documented7
- Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures5
- Execute tests in parallel5
- API Testing5
- Python Support4
- Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail4
- Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json3
- Context isolation3
- Fastest1
Pros of Selenide
- Nice JAVA API5
- Very mature API2
- File upload support2
- Integrated with WebDriverManager project2
- Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework2
- Capture screen shots on fail1
- Cross browser1
- Proxy server1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Playwright
- Less help12
- Node based3
- Does not execute outside of browser2
Cons of Selenide
- Hybrid page model not possible1