Postman vs ReadMe Build

Overview

Postman

Stacks96.1K

Followers82.5K

Votes1.8K

Forks0

ReadMe Build

Stacks3

Followers14

Votes0

Postman vs ReadMe Build: What are the differences?

Integration of API testing: Postman is primarily used for API testing and development, while ReadMe Build focuses more on API documentation and building. This fundamental difference in focus provides distinct advantages in terms of functionality and user experience for each platform.
Collaboration features: Postman offers team collaboration features that allow multiple users to work on API development projects simultaneously and share collections easily. In contrast, ReadMe Build focuses more on enabling collaboration around API documentation, making it simple for teams to create and maintain API documentation collectively.
Automated testing: Postman provides robust capabilities for automated testing of APIs, allowing users to create and run tests in an automated manner. On the other hand, ReadMe Build does not offer the same level of automated testing features, focusing instead on providing an intuitive interface for creating and editing API documentation.
API mocking: Postman includes API mocking capabilities that allow users to simulate API responses without implementing the actual API. In contrast, ReadMe Build does not offer API mocking functionality, as it is more geared towards assisting developers in creating comprehensive and user-friendly API documentation for their projects.
API monitoring: Postman offers API monitoring features that allow users to monitor the performance and availability of APIs in real-time. This functionality is not available in ReadMe Build, which prioritizes providing tools for generating and maintaining high-quality API documentation.
Security testing: Postman includes security testing features that enable users to analyze and identify security vulnerabilities in APIs. This aspect is not a primary focus in ReadMe Build, which concentrates on streamlining the process of creating clear and informative API documentation for developers.

In Summary, Postman and ReadMe Build offer distinct sets of features and functionalities, with Postman being more focused on API testing and development, while ReadMe Build is tailored towards API documentation and collaboration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Postman, ReadMe Build

Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

Reviewon

Postman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k

Comments

StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k

Comments

Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Postman	ReadMe Build
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.	Build allows you to really easily move from code to deployed services without ever having to worry about provisioning, setting up and managing servers. You focus on code, we handle the rest - simple.
Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud	-
Statistics
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 96.1K	Stacks 3
Followers 82.5K	Followers 14
Votes 1.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 490 Easy to use 369 Great tool 276 Makes developing rest api's easy peasy 156 Easy setup, looks good 144 The best api workflow out there Cons 10 Stores credentials in HTTP 9 Bloated features and UI 8 Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens 7 Poor GraphQL support 5 Expensive	No community feedback yet
Integrations
HipChat Keen Slack Dropbox Datadog PagerDuty Bigpanda Microsoft Teams Newman VictorOps	ReadMe.io npm

What are some alternatives to Postman, ReadMe Build?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs ReadMe Build: What are the differences?

Integration of API testing: Postman is primarily used for API testing and development, while ReadMe Build focuses more on API documentation and building. This fundamental difference in focus provides distinct advantages in terms of functionality and user experience for each platform.
Collaboration features: Postman offers team collaboration features that allow multiple users to work on API development projects simultaneously and share collections easily. In contrast, ReadMe Build focuses more on enabling collaboration around API documentation, making it simple for teams to create and maintain API documentation collectively.
Automated testing: Postman provides robust capabilities for automated testing of APIs, allowing users to create and run tests in an automated manner. On the other hand, ReadMe Build does not offer the same level of automated testing features, focusing instead on providing an intuitive interface for creating and editing API documentation.
API mocking: Postman includes API mocking capabilities that allow users to simulate API responses without implementing the actual API. In contrast, ReadMe Build does not offer API mocking functionality, as it is more geared towards assisting developers in creating comprehensive and user-friendly API documentation for their projects.
API monitoring: Postman offers API monitoring features that allow users to monitor the performance and availability of APIs in real-time. This functionality is not available in ReadMe Build, which prioritizes providing tools for generating and maintaining high-quality API documentation.
Security testing: Postman includes security testing features that enable users to analyze and identify security vulnerabilities in APIs. This aspect is not a primary focus in ReadMe Build, which concentrates on streamlining the process of creating clear and informative API documentation for developers.

Postman vs ReadMe Build

Overview