StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Postman vs RestSharp

Postman vs RestSharp

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Postman
Postman
Stacks96.1K
Followers82.5K
Votes1.8K
Forks0
RestSharp
RestSharp
Stacks743
Followers37
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.8K
Forks2.3K

Postman vs RestSharp: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Postman and RestSharp. Postman and RestSharp are both tools used for making API calls and testing RESTful APIs. However, they have several differences which are explained below.

  1. Ease of Use: Postman provides an intuitive and user-friendly graphical interface that allows users to easily create and manage requests, organize them into collections, and run tests. On the other hand, RestSharp is a lightweight and straightforward library that requires coding and provides a programmatic way to interact with APIs using C#.

  2. Authentication Support: Postman offers built-in support for various authentication mechanisms like Basic Authentication, OAuth 1.0 and 2.0, and Bearer Token authentication. It simplifies the process of configuring and managing authentication parameters. RestSharp, on the other hand, requires manual coding to include authentication headers and parameters in the request.

  3. Request Customization: Postman allows users to customize headers, query parameters, and request bodies easily through its graphical interface. It provides a range of options to set request parameters with just a few clicks. RestSharp provides more granular control over request customization, allowing users to specify headers, query parameters, and request bodies programmatically.

  4. Test Automation: Postman provides a powerful test automation feature that allows users to write tests using JavaScript. These tests can be executed and validated automatically, providing a convenient way to ensure API responses meet the expected criteria. RestSharp does not provide an in-built testing framework, and users need to leverage external testing frameworks like NUnit or xUnit to automate tests.

  5. Response Handling: Postman offers a comprehensive response viewer that displays the complete response in a nicely formatted manner. It allows users to explore the response body, headers, cookies, and status codes easily. RestSharp provides a more low-level response handling approach, where users need to parse and extract the required information manually from the response object.

  6. Platform Compatibility: Postman is a cross-platform tool that supports Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems. It also provides a web version that can be accessed from any modern web browser. RestSharp, being a C# library, is primarily intended for Windows development but can be used with compatible frameworks like .NET Core for cross-platform development.

In summary, Postman offers a user-friendly GUI, built-in authentication support, easy request customization, powerful test automation, comprehensive response handling, and cross-platform compatibility. On the other hand, RestSharp provides a lightweight, programmatic approach with more control over request customization, but lacks built-in testing capabilities and platform compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Postman
Postman
RestSharp
RestSharp

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

It is probably the most popular HTTP client library for .NET. Featuring automatic serialization and deserialization, request and response type detection, variety of authentications and other useful features

Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud
Serialization; Sync and Async; Extensive configuration; Authentication; Forms, request body, and files
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.8K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
96.1K
Stacks
743
Followers
82.5K
Followers
37
Votes
1.8K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
Cons
  • 10
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
No community feedback yet
Integrations
HipChat
HipChat
Keen
Keen
Slack
Slack
Dropbox
Dropbox
Datadog
Datadog
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Bigpanda
Bigpanda
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Newman
Newman
VictorOps
VictorOps
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Postman, RestSharp?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope