Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Rainforest QA vs Sauce Labs vs Selenium: What are the differences?
Introduction: In the field of software testing, Rainforest QA, Sauce Labs, and Selenium are popular tools. Understanding the key differences between these tools can help organizations make informed decisions about their testing strategies.
Deployment and Infrastructure: Rainforest QA is a cloud-based platform that requires no setup or maintenance, allowing users to access testing environments instantly. Sauce Labs, on the other hand, provides a cloud infrastructure for testing on various browsers and devices. Selenium, being open-source, requires users to set up their own testing infrastructure on local machines or servers.
Testing Capabilities: Rainforest QA offers AI-powered testing that automates test case creation and execution, making it suitable for quick exploratory testing. Sauce Labs provides a robust cross-browser testing platform for manual and automated testing, catering to a wider range of testing scenarios. Selenium is primarily a testing framework that allows customization and integration with other tools for extensive testing capabilities.
Ease of Use: Rainforest QA simplifies the testing process with its codeless test automation and easy-to-navigate interface, suitable for beginners or non-technical users. Sauce Labs offers a user-friendly platform with integrations for popular testing frameworks, making it convenient for teams with coding expertise. Selenium, being code-centric, requires programming skills for test script development and maintenance.
Integration and Scalability: Rainforest QA provides seamless integrations with popular tools and platforms for test case management and issue tracking, ensuring scalability for growing testing requirements. Sauce Labs offers integrations with CI/CD pipelines and test management tools, enabling streamlined testing workflows and scalability. Selenium's integration capabilities depend on additional plugins or libraries, affecting the ease of scalability and maintenance.
Cost and Licensing: Rainforest QA follows a subscription-based pricing model, offering flexible plans based on testing needs, making it cost-effective for small to medium-sized businesses. Sauce Labs offers a combination of pay-as-you-go and subscription plans, suitable for enterprises with varying testing demands. Selenium, being open-source, is free to use; however, costs may incur for infrastructure setup, maintenance, and additional tools/plugins.
Support and Community: Rainforest QA provides dedicated support and a robust community forum for troubleshooting and knowledge sharing, ensuring users receive timely assistance. Sauce Labs offers enterprise-level support and training options for comprehensive technical guidance. Selenium's community-driven support relies on user forums, online resources, and documentation, requiring users to rely on community expertise for assistance.
In Summary, the key differences between Rainforest QA, Sauce Labs, and Selenium lie in their deployment infrastructure, testing capabilities, ease of use, integration scalability, cost, and support offerings.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................
with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing
Pros of Rainforest QA
- Cross-browser testing13
- Powerful API7
- QA7
- Super-simple test creation7
- Easy way to get real front-end smoke tests6
- Simple5
- CI Integration5
- Manual regression testing results in 30 mins3
Pros of Sauce Labs
- Selenium-compatible60
- Webdriver compatible46
- Video recordings of every test35
- Qa31
- Mobile support29
- Any programming language26
- Developer tools23
- Test local and firewalled servers21
- Jenkins integration20
- Pristine VMs18
- CI Compatible17
- Appium support11
- Parallel testing9
- Rapid environment preparation8
- Mobile device support8
- Easy testing on almost any device7
- Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT7
- Secure testing and easy setup6
- Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests5
- Quick support response5
- Fast and reliable to host the automated tests4
- Easy to setup and understand,4
- Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci3
- Maintained browser matrix3
- Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers3
- Efficient tool to verify product quality2
- Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win2
- Hany for platform testing2
- Great documentation2
- Generous free trial2
- Easy. Straightforward. Scalable2
- Great way to integrate test suite on cloud2
- Simplicity of Sauce-connect2
- Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support1
- It's great for my QA work1
- Awesome tech support1
- Having this available for CI servers is fantastic1
- Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing1
- Depth of integrations1
- Because of its cloud based support for appium1
- Easy setup, Works great with selenium.1
- QE support1
- Manuals are not very well versed for beginners1
- Secure testing1
- Cheaper than browserstack1
- Stable1
- Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs0
Pros of Selenium
- Automates browsers177
- Testing154
- Essential tool for running test automation101
- Record-Playback24
- Remote Control24
- Data crawling8
- Supports end to end testing7
- Easy set up6
- Functional testing6
- The Most flexible monitoring system4
- End to End Testing3
- Easy to integrate with build tools3
- Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm2
- Record and playback2
- Compatible with Python2
- Easy to scale2
- Integration Tests2
- Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Rainforest QA
Cons of Sauce Labs
- Relatively slow2
- Expensive2
Cons of Selenium
- Flaky tests8
- Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)4
- Update browser drivers2