Rainforest QA vs Test Studio: What are the differences?
Rainforest QA: Front-end QA as a service. Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests; Test Studio: An automated web, WPF and load testing solution. It is a Windows-based software testing tool for web and desktop functional testing, software performance testing, load testing and mobile application testing. The tool ships with a plugin for Visual Studio and a standalone app that use the same repositories and file formats.
Rainforest QA and Test Studio can be categorized as "Browser Testing" tools.
Some of the features offered by Rainforest QA are:
- Infinitely Scalable, On-Demand QA Team
- Cross Browser Testing
- Regression, Functional, and Exploratory Testing
On the other hand, Test Studio provides the following key features:
- Script-less test recording and playback
- Cross-browser test execution – Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari (web browser)
- Support for HTML, AJAX, Silverlight, WPF and ASP.NET MVC application testing
What is Rainforest QA?
What is Test Studio?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Test Studio?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Rainforest QA?
What are the cons of using Test Studio?
What companies use Test Studio?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
As a PM with a fair amount of testing experience I've been using Rainforest QA to build up a functional test suite for our web app. Writing tests is straightforward and it's nice to then get real humans executing the tests so that you can get readable feedback when something isn't working. I'd certainly recommend giving it a try to see if it might fit your workflow.