Review Board vs SonarQube

Overview

Review Board

Stacks19

Followers52

Votes6

GitHub Stars1.7K

Forks435

SonarQube

Stacks1.9K

Followers2.0K

Votes53

GitHub Stars10.0K

Forks2.1K

Review Board vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Code Review vs. Static Analysis: Review Board primarily focuses on code review, where human reviewers manually inspect code changes, provide feedback, and approve the changes, while SonarQube specializes in static code analysis, using automated tools to identify code quality issues, security vulnerabilities, and bugs.
Support for Different Languages: Review Board supports a wide range of programming languages, including but not limited to Python, Java, C/C++, while SonarQube offers support for an even broader set of languages, with over 25 languages covered including JavaScript, PHP, and Ruby.
Integration and Extensibility: Review Board easily integrates with popular version control systems like Git and Subversion, and also allows for integration with bug tracking tools such as JIRA, while SonarQube provides a robust API for extensibility and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines.
Focus on Collaboration: Review Board emphasizes collaboration between developers during the code review process, enabling discussions, annotations, and iterative improvements, whereas SonarQube places more emphasis on providing detailed reports and metrics on code quality, security issues, and technical debt.
License and Cost: Review Board is an open-source tool licensed under the MIT License, allowing for free usage and modifications, while SonarQube offers both a free Community Edition and a paid Enterprise Edition with additional features and support.
Scalability and Performance: Review Board is suited for smaller to medium-sized teams due to its simple setup and lightweight nature, whereas SonarQube is designed for larger organizations with complex codebases, providing scalability, and robust performance monitoring capabilities.

In Summary, Review Board primarily focuses on manual code reviews, supports fewer languages, and emphasizes collaboration, while SonarQube specializes in automated static code analysis, supports a wide range of languages, and provides detailed reports on code quality.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Review Board	SonarQube
Review Board is an open source, web-based code and document review tool built to help companies, open source projects, and other organizations keep their quality high and their bug count low.	SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
Syntax-highlighted diffs; Smarter indentation handling; Moved code detection; Know exactly what function or class you're in; See more context in your diffs; Multi-line commenting in diffs/text files; Track status of automated builds and reviews	Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.7K	GitHub Stars 10.0K
GitHub Forks 435	GitHub Forks 2.1K
Stacks 19	Stacks 1.9K
Followers 52	Followers 2.0K
Votes 6	Votes 53
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Simple to use. Great UI 1 Review Bots 1 Open Source 1 Diff between review versions	Pros 26 Tracks code complexity and smell trends 16 IDE Integration 9 Complete code Review 2 Difficult to deploy Cons 7 Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful 7 Sales process is long and unfriendly 1 Does not integrate with Snyk
Integrations
Travis CI Slack iDoneThis Bitbucket GitHub Git Azure DevOps CircleCI GitLab Trello	Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins TeamCity Appveyor Travis CI Apache Ant Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Review Board, SonarQube?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

Review Board vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Code Review vs. Static Analysis: Review Board primarily focuses on code review, where human reviewers manually inspect code changes, provide feedback, and approve the changes, while SonarQube specializes in static code analysis, using automated tools to identify code quality issues, security vulnerabilities, and bugs.
Support for Different Languages: Review Board supports a wide range of programming languages, including but not limited to Python, Java, C/C++, while SonarQube offers support for an even broader set of languages, with over 25 languages covered including JavaScript, PHP, and Ruby.
Integration and Extensibility: Review Board easily integrates with popular version control systems like Git and Subversion, and also allows for integration with bug tracking tools such as JIRA, while SonarQube provides a robust API for extensibility and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines.
Focus on Collaboration: Review Board emphasizes collaboration between developers during the code review process, enabling discussions, annotations, and iterative improvements, whereas SonarQube places more emphasis on providing detailed reports and metrics on code quality, security issues, and technical debt.
License and Cost: Review Board is an open-source tool licensed under the MIT License, allowing for free usage and modifications, while SonarQube offers both a free Community Edition and a paid Enterprise Edition with additional features and support.
Scalability and Performance: Review Board is suited for smaller to medium-sized teams due to its simple setup and lightweight nature, whereas SonarQube is designed for larger organizations with complex codebases, providing scalability, and robust performance monitoring capabilities.

Review Board vs SonarQube

Overview