Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Rundeck

203
343
+ 1
7
Terraform

18.6K
14.6K
+ 1
344
Add tool

Rundeck vs Terraform: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Integration**:
Rundeck is primarily used for orchestrating workflows across different systems, whereas Terraform focuses on infrastructure as code, allowing users to define and provision infrastructure in a declarative manner.

2. **Syntax**:
Rundeck uses a YAML or XML-based syntax to define job workflows, while Terraform uses HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL) to define infrastructure resources and their dependencies, making it more user-friendly for defining and managing infrastructure.

3. **Scope**:
Rundeck is more focused on task orchestration and automation, offering features such as job scheduling, remote execution, and logging, while Terraform focuses on provisioning and managing infrastructure resources, such as virtual machines, containers, networks, and services.

4. **Plugins**:
Rundeck provides a wide range of plugins for integrating with various tools and services, making it highly extensible in terms of functionality, whereas Terraform has a smaller but growing number of providers and modules for integrating with different cloud providers and services.

5. **State Management**:
Terraform maintains a state file that keeps track of the resources it manages, allowing for efficient updates and resource tracking, while Rundeck does not have a built-in state management system, making it more suitable for ad-hoc task execution and automation.

6. **Community Support**:
Terraform has a larger and more active community compared to Rundeck, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-contributed modules, making it easier for users to get started and troubleshoot issues.

In Summary, Rundeck is a tool for orchestrating workflows and task automation, while Terraform is designed for infrastructure provisioning and management using declarative code.

Decisions about Rundeck and Terraform

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

See more
Sergey Ivanov
Overview

We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.

Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.

Advantages

Terraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.

Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.

Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.

Disadvantages

Software is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.

Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.

Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.

See more

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
See more

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Rundeck
Pros of Terraform
  • 3
    Role based access control
  • 3
    Easy to understand
  • 1
    Doesn't need containers
  • 121
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
  • 8
    Well-documented
  • 8
    Cloud agnostic
  • 6
    It's like coding your infrastructure in simple English
  • 6
    Immutable infrastructure
  • 5
    Platform agnostic
  • 4
    Extendable
  • 4
    Automation
  • 4
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 4
    Portability
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Scales to hundreds of hosts

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Rundeck
Cons of Terraform
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Doesn't have full support to GKE

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Rundeck?

    A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.

    What is Terraform?

    With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Rundeck?
    What companies use Terraform?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Rundeck?
    What tools integrate with Terraform?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitGitHubPython+22
    17
    14329
    JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
    53
    22303
    What are some alternatives to Rundeck and Terraform?
    Airplane
    It is a developer-centric approach to building internal UIs and workflows. Turn APIs, SQL queries, and scripts into apps for the entire team.
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    Ansible
    Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
    Airflow
    Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.
    StackStorm
    StackStorm is a platform for integration and automation across services and tools. It ties together your existing infrastructure and application environment so you can more easily automate that environment -- with a particular focus on taking actions in response to events.
    See all alternatives