StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. Skaffold vs Spinnaker

Skaffold vs Spinnaker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spinnaker
Spinnaker
Stacks233
Followers358
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks1.2K
Skaffold
Skaffold
Stacks86
Followers186
Votes0

Skaffold vs Spinnaker: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Strategy: One key difference between Skaffold and Spinnaker is the deployment strategy they employ. Skaffold is mainly focused on providing a fast and efficient workflow for developing applications locally and deploying them to Kubernetes. In contrast, Spinnaker is a more comprehensive continuous delivery platform that facilitates complex deployment pipelines across multiple cloud platforms, not just limited to Kubernetes.

  2. Scope of Automation: Skaffold is designed to automate the process of building container images and deploying applications to Kubernetes clusters. On the other hand, Spinnaker offers a wider range of automation capabilities, including the management of application releases, rollbacks, canary deployments, automated quality gates, and multi-cloud deployment strategies.

  3. Community Support and Integration: Skaffold has gained popularity within the Kubernetes community for its simplicity and ease of use. It has strong integration with tools like Docker and Kubernetes, making it a preferred choice for developers working in Kubernetes environments. Meanwhile, Spinnaker has a more robust community support and integration with a variety of cloud providers, enabling seamless deployment across different cloud environments.

  4. User Interface and Visualization: Another significant difference is in the user interface and visualization features offered by Skaffold and Spinnaker. Skaffold primarily operates through the command line interface, providing quick feedback on build and deployment processes. In contrast, Spinnaker offers a rich graphical user interface that enables users to visualize and manage the entire deployment pipeline, making it easier to track and analyze the deployment process.

  5. Flexibility and Extensibility: Skaffold is known for its simplicity and lightweight nature, focusing on the core tasks of building and deploying applications with Kubernetes. While it may lack some advanced features, it allows for easy integration with other tools and workflows. Spinnaker, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive platform with advanced deployment strategies and extensibility options, catering to complex deployment scenarios and enterprise-level requirements.

  6. Security and Compliance: Spinnaker places a strong emphasis on security and compliance features, offering capabilities such as RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), audit trails, and integration with security tools for vulnerability scanning and policy enforcement. In comparison, Skaffold is more limited in terms of built-in security features, making it more suitable for smaller-scale or less sensitive projects.

In Summary, Skaffold is a lightweight deployment tool focused on local development to Kubernetes, whereas Spinnaker is a comprehensive continuous delivery platform with broader automation and deployment capabilities across multiple cloud environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spinnaker
Spinnaker
Skaffold
Skaffold

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Skaffold is a command line tool that facilitates continuous development for Kubernetes applications. You can iterate on your application source code locally then deploy to local or remote Kubernetes clusters. Skaffold handles the workflow for building, pushing and deploying your application. It can also be used in an automated context such as a CI/CD pipeline to leverage the same workflow and tooling when moving applications to production.

-
No server-side component. No overhead to your cluster.;Detect changes in your source code and automatically build/push/deploy.;Image tag management. Stop worrying about updating the image tags in Kubernetes manifests to push out changes during development.;Supports existing tooling and workflows. Build and deploy APIs make each implementation composable to support many different workflows.;Support for multiple application components. Build and deploy only the pieces of your stack that have changed.;Deploy regularly when saving files or run one off deployments using the same configuration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
233
Stacks
86
Followers
358
Followers
186
Votes
14
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Mature
Cons
  • 3
    No GitOps
  • 1
    Configuration time
  • 1
    Management overhead
  • 1
    Ease of use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Packer
Packer
Prometheus
Prometheus
Chef
Chef
Jenkins
Jenkins
Docker
Docker
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Spinnaker, Skaffold?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana