Smartling vs Weblate

Overview

Weblate

Stacks27

Followers26

Votes12

GitHub Stars5.5K

Forks1.2K

Smartling

Stacks8

Followers20

Votes0

Smartling vs Weblate: What are the differences?

Workflow Automation: Smartling offers advanced workflow automation capabilities, allowing users to create custom workflows, automate content translation processes, and integrate seamlessly with existing systems. Weblate, on the other hand, provides basic workflow management features but lacks the robust automation options of Smartling.
Cost Structure: Smartling usually operates on a subscription-based model with pricing based on the number of words translated. In contrast, Weblate is an open-source platform, making it a cost-effective option for organizations looking to manage their translation projects internally without incurring additional expenses for licensing or subscriptions.
User Interface: Smartling boasts a user-friendly and intuitive interface that streamlines the translation and localization process, making it easy for users to manage and track their projects efficiently. Weblate also provides a user-friendly interface but may not offer the same level of customization and ease of use as Smartling for complex translation projects.
Integration Capabilities: Smartling offers extensive integration options with popular Content Management Systems (CMS), third-party tools, and APIs, enabling seamless connectivity with various platforms for efficient translation management. Weblate, while providing some integration capabilities, may not offer the same breadth of integrations as Smartling, limiting connectivity with other systems.
Quality Control Features: Smartling includes advanced quality control features such as translation memory, glossary management, and linguistic validation tools to ensure accurate and consistent translations. Weblate, while offering basic quality control functionalities, may not provide the same level of comprehensive tools for maintaining translation quality throughout the localization process.
Support Services: Smartling offers dedicated customer support, training resources, and regular updates to assist users in optimizing their translation workflows and addressing any technical issues promptly. Weblate, being an open-source platform, may rely more on community support and documentation, potentially offering limited direct assistance for users in need of guidance or troubleshooting.

In Summary, Smartling and Weblate differ in workflow automation, cost structure, user interface, integration capabilities, quality control features, and support services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Weblate	Smartling
Weblate is a libre software web-based continuous localization system used by over 1150+ opensource projects & companies in over 115+ countries around the World.	Smartling takes the complexity, cost and time out of the translation process by providing companies with an automated, cloud-based translation management platform and comprehensive translation services.
Continuous localization - connect to your VCS repository and bring translators closer to the development; Quality checks - ensure the translations meet your quality requirements; 20+ file formats - gettext, Xliff, JSON, Android, iOS, RESX and much more; Glossary - built in glossary to ensure consistent terminology within a translation; Machine translation - use third party machine translation services to bootstrap your translation; Translation memory - built in translation memory to speed up localization process; REST API and cli - integrate with your workflow or third party services	Translation memory;Custom workflows;Business intelligence;Website proxy tool;Translation quality tools; Integrations
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 27	Stacks 8
Followers 26	Followers 20
Votes 12	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Version control integration 1 Agile Localization 1 L10n Platform 1 API 1 Continuous localization	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Google Analytics GitHub Bitbucket GitLab Sentry Rollbar Matomo	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Weblate, Smartling?

Localazy

Reportedly (by developers) the most friendly localization and translation management platform.

Crowdin

Crowdin is localization management software enchanced by AI for teams. Translate your apps, websites, games, documentation, marketing campaigns, and other content into 100+ languages. Create a native experience for your global customers.

Phrase

The Phrase Localization Platform is a unique, AI-powered language platform that integrates translation, scoring, and automation tools in one place for businesses and language service providers.

GitLocalize

GitLocalize is a continuous localization tool built for communities and teams that want to simplify their workflow when translating their content. GitLocalize automatically syncs with your repository so you can keep your workflow on GitHub.

OneSky

OneSky provides a powerful cloud-based translation management system (TMS) that streamlines the entire translation management process for mobile apps, websites and documents. OneSky offers professional translation services and application testing solutions in 60+ languages. Over 3,000 companies have used OneSky to expand their global presence.

Transifex

Transifex is a cloud-based localization platform built to help you manage the translation and localization of your app, website, video subtitles, and more. It acts as a repository for your content (think GitHub for translation) and includes tools for developers to get that content into Transifex automatically. Transifex also provides translators a web interface to submit translations.

Tran.sl

Real time marketplace of translation services. We help companies make their products global by translating their software, social media and user generated content. Social media localization, document translation, software localization, API

shipi18n

Shipi18n is a translation API built for developers. Translate JSON and i18n files to 100+ languages while automatically preserving placeholders like {name}, {{count}}, and %s. Key features: • Native i18next support with CLDR pluralization (auto-generates _one, _few, _many, _other) • Placeholder preservation for ICU MessageFormat • 90-day translation memory caching • Key-based pricing (pay per unique string, not API calls) Developer tools: npm SDK, CLI, GitHub Action, Vite plugin, i18next backend

Soniox

Transcribe and translate speech in over 60 languages, in real-time, with high accuracy.

i18next

It is an internationalization-framework written in and for JavaScript. But it's much more than that! It goes beyond just providing the standard i18n features such as (plurals, context, interpolation, format). It provides you with a complete solution to localize your product from web to mobile and desktop.

Related Comparisons

Smartling vs Weblate: What are the differences?

Workflow Automation: Smartling offers advanced workflow automation capabilities, allowing users to create custom workflows, automate content translation processes, and integrate seamlessly with existing systems. Weblate, on the other hand, provides basic workflow management features but lacks the robust automation options of Smartling.
Cost Structure: Smartling usually operates on a subscription-based model with pricing based on the number of words translated. In contrast, Weblate is an open-source platform, making it a cost-effective option for organizations looking to manage their translation projects internally without incurring additional expenses for licensing or subscriptions.
User Interface: Smartling boasts a user-friendly and intuitive interface that streamlines the translation and localization process, making it easy for users to manage and track their projects efficiently. Weblate also provides a user-friendly interface but may not offer the same level of customization and ease of use as Smartling for complex translation projects.
Integration Capabilities: Smartling offers extensive integration options with popular Content Management Systems (CMS), third-party tools, and APIs, enabling seamless connectivity with various platforms for efficient translation management. Weblate, while providing some integration capabilities, may not offer the same breadth of integrations as Smartling, limiting connectivity with other systems.
Quality Control Features: Smartling includes advanced quality control features such as translation memory, glossary management, and linguistic validation tools to ensure accurate and consistent translations. Weblate, while offering basic quality control functionalities, may not provide the same level of comprehensive tools for maintaining translation quality throughout the localization process.
Support Services: Smartling offers dedicated customer support, training resources, and regular updates to assist users in optimizing their translation workflows and addressing any technical issues promptly. Weblate, being an open-source platform, may rely more on community support and documentation, potentially offering limited direct assistance for users in need of guidance or troubleshooting.

In Summary, Smartling and Weblate differ in workflow automation, cost structure, user interface, integration capabilities, quality control features, and support services.

Smartling vs Weblate

Overview