Snyk vs SonarQube

Overview

SonarQube

Stacks1.9K

Followers2.0K

Votes53

GitHub Stars10.0K

Forks2.1K

Snyk

Stacks580

Followers380

Votes20

Snyk vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Snyk and SonarQube are used for code quality and security assurance, playing crucial roles in improving the development process. However, they differ in terms of features and approaches. Now, let's delve into the primary distinctions between Snyk and SonarQube:

Focus: Snyk specializes in identifying and resolving vulnerabilities and dependencies in open-source libraries and container images. It helps developers address security issues in their code dependencies, ensuring the use of secure and up-to-date components. SonarQube, on the other hand, provides comprehensive code quality analysis, covering code smells, bugs, vulnerabilities, and technical debt.
Integration and Compatibility: Snyk integrates with various development tools, including IDEs, build systems, and CI/CD pipelines, providing seamless integration into the development workflow. It supports multiple programming languages and package managers. SonarQube also integrates with development tools but requires a dedicated server installation for analysis. It supports a wide range of programming languages and build systems but might require additional configuration for specific environments.
Code Analysis: Snyk primarily performs static analysis of dependencies and their associated vulnerabilities. It scans project dependencies and provides detailed vulnerability reports, suggesting remediation steps. SonarQube, in addition to static analysis, performs more comprehensive code analysis, including code duplication detection, code coverage, code complexity analysis, and adherence to coding standards. It offers a broader range of code quality metrics and rules for analysis.
Developer-Friendly Approach: Snyk aims to empower developers with actionable insights into code vulnerabilities, providing integration with IDEs and offering easy-to-understand reports with remediation guidance. It emphasizes developer involvement in the security process. SonarQube, while developer-friendly, also caters to other stakeholders, including project managers and quality assurance teams, by providing comprehensive reports and metrics for code quality and maintainability.
Deployment: Snyk is often used as a cloud-based service, allowing developers to quickly scan their projects without the need for complex infrastructure setup. It offers seamless integration with cloud-native environments and container orchestration platforms. SonarQube, on the other hand, can be deployed as a self-hosted solution, allowing organizations to have more control over the analysis process and data security. It requires dedicated server setup and maintenance.

In summary, Snyk focuses on identifying vulnerabilities in code dependencies, offering seamless integration, and prioritizing developer involvement in the security process. It specializes in open-source library and container image security. SonarQube, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive code quality analysis solution, covering various aspects of code quality and maintainability. It offers broader analysis capabilities but requires a dedicated server setup and serves a wider range of stakeholders beyond just developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SonarQube, Snyk

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube	Snyk
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.	Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform
Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 580
Followers 2.0K	Followers 380
Votes 53	Votes 20
Pros & Cons
Pros 26 Tracks code complexity and smell trends 16 IDE Integration 9 Complete code Review 2 Difficult to deploy Cons 7 Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful 7 Sales process is long and unfriendly 1 Does not integrate with Snyk	Pros 10 Github Integration 5 Free for open source projects 4 Finds lots of real vulnerabilities 1 Easy to deployed Cons 2 Does not integrated with SonarQube 1 No malware detection 1 False positives 1 Complex UI 1 No surface monitoring
Integrations
Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins TeamCity Appveyor Travis CI Apache Ant Bamboo	Scala .NET GitHub CircleCI Docker JavaScript Node.js Python Golang Java

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, Snyk?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

Focus: Snyk specializes in identifying and resolving vulnerabilities and dependencies in open-source libraries and container images. It helps developers address security issues in their code dependencies, ensuring the use of secure and up-to-date components. SonarQube, on the other hand, provides comprehensive code quality analysis, covering code smells, bugs, vulnerabilities, and technical debt.
Integration and Compatibility: Snyk integrates with various development tools, including IDEs, build systems, and CI/CD pipelines, providing seamless integration into the development workflow. It supports multiple programming languages and package managers. SonarQube also integrates with development tools but requires a dedicated server installation for analysis. It supports a wide range of programming languages and build systems but might require additional configuration for specific environments.
Code Analysis: Snyk primarily performs static analysis of dependencies and their associated vulnerabilities. It scans project dependencies and provides detailed vulnerability reports, suggesting remediation steps. SonarQube, in addition to static analysis, performs more comprehensive code analysis, including code duplication detection, code coverage, code complexity analysis, and adherence to coding standards. It offers a broader range of code quality metrics and rules for analysis.
Developer-Friendly Approach: Snyk aims to empower developers with actionable insights into code vulnerabilities, providing integration with IDEs and offering easy-to-understand reports with remediation guidance. It emphasizes developer involvement in the security process. SonarQube, while developer-friendly, also caters to other stakeholders, including project managers and quality assurance teams, by providing comprehensive reports and metrics for code quality and maintainability.
Deployment: Snyk is often used as a cloud-based service, allowing developers to quickly scan their projects without the need for complex infrastructure setup. It offers seamless integration with cloud-native environments and container orchestration platforms. SonarQube, on the other hand, can be deployed as a self-hosted solution, allowing organizations to have more control over the analysis process and data security. It requires dedicated server setup and maintenance.

Snyk vs SonarQube