Test Studio vs Testim

Overview

Testim

Stacks34

Followers57

Votes0

Test Studio

Stacks2

Followers17

Votes0

GitHub Stars2

Forks11

Test Studio vs Testim: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This comparison will highlight the key differences between Test Studio and Testim, two popular software testing tools.

Easy Test Creation and Maintenance: Test Studio offers a codeless, visual test creation interface which allows users to easily create and maintain tests without any programming knowledge. On the other hand, Testim provides a codeless test creation platform that supports both scriptless and coded tests, allowing users to create tests using a variety of scripting languages.
Cross-Browser and Device Testing: Test Studio provides comprehensive cross-browser and device testing capabilities, allowing users to test their applications on different browsers and mobile devices. Testim also supports cross-browser and device testing, but its focus is more on mobile device testing, providing extensive support for Android and iOS platforms.
Integration with Test Management Tools: Test Studio seamlessly integrates with popular test management tools such as Jira and TFS, allowing users to synchronize their test cases, requirements, and defects. Testim also offers integration with test management tools, but its available integrations are more limited compared to Test Studio.
Collaborative Testing: Test Studio offers collaborative testing capabilities, allowing teams to work together on test case creation, execution, and review. It provides features like shared test repositories, test result sharing, and comment-based discussions. Testim also supports collaboration by providing features like shared test suites and commenting capabilities, facilitating team-based testing.
AI-Powered Self-Healing Tests: Testim leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to automatically fix failing tests, reducing maintenance efforts. Its self-healing capabilities analyze changes in the application's UI and update the tests accordingly. Test Studio does not offer AI-powered self-healing tests as a native feature.
Performance Testing: Test Studio includes built-in performance testing capabilities, allowing users to measure the performance of their applications under different loads. Testim, on the other hand, focuses primarily on functional testing and does not provide built-in performance testing features.

In Summary, Test Studio provides a codeless test creation interface, extensive cross-browser and device testing, seamless integration with test management tools, collaborative testing capabilities, and built-in performance testing. In contrast, Testim supports both coded and scriptless test creation, offers strong mobile device testing support, and leverages AI for self-healing tests, but its integration options are more limited, and it lacks built-in performance testing features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Testim	Test Studio
It uses artificial intelligence to speed-up the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests.	It is a Windows-based software testing tool for web and desktop functional testing, software performance testing, load testing and mobile application testing. The tool ships with a plugin for Visual Studio and a standalone app that use the same repositories and file formats.
Super fast authoring; Machine learning based self-maintenance; Efficiency at scale; Fast, scalable test runs	Script-less test recording and playback; Cross-browser test execution – Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari (web browser); Support for HTML, AJAX, Silverlight, WPF and ASP.NET MVC application testing; Element abstraction and reuse.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 2
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 11
Stacks 34	Stacks 2
Followers 57	Followers 17
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Travis CI GitHub Visual Studio Jira TeamCity Slack Codeship Trello Jenkins StrongLoop	Testrail FogBugz Bugsnag Sentry Jira TestFairy Instabug HipTest

What are some alternatives to Testim, Test Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

Test Studio vs Testim: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This comparison will highlight the key differences between Test Studio and Testim, two popular software testing tools.

Easy Test Creation and Maintenance: Test Studio offers a codeless, visual test creation interface which allows users to easily create and maintain tests without any programming knowledge. On the other hand, Testim provides a codeless test creation platform that supports both scriptless and coded tests, allowing users to create tests using a variety of scripting languages.
Cross-Browser and Device Testing: Test Studio provides comprehensive cross-browser and device testing capabilities, allowing users to test their applications on different browsers and mobile devices. Testim also supports cross-browser and device testing, but its focus is more on mobile device testing, providing extensive support for Android and iOS platforms.
Integration with Test Management Tools: Test Studio seamlessly integrates with popular test management tools such as Jira and TFS, allowing users to synchronize their test cases, requirements, and defects. Testim also offers integration with test management tools, but its available integrations are more limited compared to Test Studio.
Collaborative Testing: Test Studio offers collaborative testing capabilities, allowing teams to work together on test case creation, execution, and review. It provides features like shared test repositories, test result sharing, and comment-based discussions. Testim also supports collaboration by providing features like shared test suites and commenting capabilities, facilitating team-based testing.
AI-Powered Self-Healing Tests: Testim leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to automatically fix failing tests, reducing maintenance efforts. Its self-healing capabilities analyze changes in the application's UI and update the tests accordingly. Test Studio does not offer AI-powered self-healing tests as a native feature.
Performance Testing: Test Studio includes built-in performance testing capabilities, allowing users to measure the performance of their applications under different loads. Testim, on the other hand, focuses primarily on functional testing and does not provide built-in performance testing features.

Test Studio vs Testim

Overview