Ansible vs Cleaver: What are the differences?
Ansible: Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine. Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use; Cleaver: Simply provision, deploy, and manage servers, websites, and apps. A server management tool for hobbyists, startups, web design shops, and managed hosting providers. Minimize server management and app deployment fuss.
Ansible and Cleaver belong to "Server Configuration and Automation" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Ansible are:
- Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.
- Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.
- Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.
On the other hand, Cleaver provides the following key features:
Ansible is an open source tool with 43.9K GitHub stars and 19.3K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Ansible's open source repository on GitHub.
