Appveyor vs Bitrise

Overview

Appveyor

Stacks123

Followers131

Votes94

Bitrise

Stacks342

Followers373

Votes74

Appveyor vs Bitrise: What are the differences?

Developers describe Appveyor as "Continuous Integration and Deployment service for busy Windows developers". AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server. On the other hand, Bitrise is detailed as "Automate your mobile app development from building through testing to deployment". In short Bitrise is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Appveyor belongs to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack, while Bitrise can be primarily classified under "Mobile Continuous Integration".

Some of the features offered by Appveyor are:

Scriptless, repetitive, one-click deployment of build artifacts to multiple environments
YAML configuration
Backed by Windows Azure platform

On the other hand, Bitrise provides the following key features:

Continuous Delivery
Hosted Environment
Customizable Workflows

"Github integration" is the top reason why over 18 developers like Appveyor, while over 10 developers mention "Easy setup" as the leading cause for choosing Bitrise.

Bitrise, ZeeMee, and Multunus are some of the popular companies that use Bitrise, whereas Appveyor is used by Snipcart, Exceptionless, and Poq. Bitrise has a broader approval, being mentioned in 29 company stacks & 14 developers stacks; compared to Appveyor, which is listed in 19 company stacks and 16 developer stacks.

🔥 Trending in Continuous Integration on StackShare

GitHub Actions Continuous Integration

Automate your workflow from idea to production

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

4.23k

3.11k

Detailed Comparison

Appveyor	Bitrise
AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.	It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.
Scriptless, repetitive, one-click deployment of build artifacts to multiple environments;YAML configuration;Backed by Windows Azure platform;Built-in NuGet feeds with project artifacts;Build artifacts are stored in a highly-durable Geo-redundant cloud storage;	Continuous Delivery;Hosted Environment;Customizable Workflows;Code Security;Open Source;Support by Devs
Statistics
Stacks 123	Stacks 342
Followers 131	Followers 373
Votes 94	Votes 74
Pros & Cons
Pros 20 Github integration 18 Simple, reliable & powerful 12 Hosted 11 YML-based configuration 10 Nuget support Cons 1 Complex user interface 1 Poor documentation	Pros 18 Easy setup 9 Bitbucket Integration 8 Advanced Workflow configuration 7 Github Integration 7 Slack integration
Integrations
GitHub Bitbucket .NET	Android SDK Apache Cordova TestFlight TestFairy Gradle Amazon S3 Xamarin Slack Parse Twilio

What are some alternatives to Appveyor, Bitrise?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.