StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs Bamboo

AWS CodeBuild vs Bamboo

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs Bamboo: What are the differences?

Comparing AWS CodeBuild and Bamboo

AWS CodeBuild and Bamboo are both popular tools used for continuous integration and continuous delivery. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Pricing Model: The pricing model of AWS CodeBuild is based on the time taken to complete the build, whereas Bamboo follows a tier-based pricing model based on the number of build agents. This difference allows organizations to choose a pricing model that best aligns with their specific needs and usage patterns.

  2. Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild is tightly integrated with other AWS services such as CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and CloudFormation. This integration allows for seamless automated deployments using AWS resources. On the other hand, Bamboo provides integration with various non-AWS tools and systems, providing flexibility for organizations with a diverse toolset.

  3. Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is designed to scale automatically based on the workload requirements. It can handle build jobs in parallel and can easily accommodate increased demand. In contrast, Bamboo requires manual configuration for scaling out, which may involve additional overhead and maintenance efforts.

  4. Deployment Options: AWS CodeBuild is a cloud-native service provided by Amazon Web Services, which means it is hosted and managed by AWS. This eliminates the need for organizations to set up and maintain their own infrastructure. Bamboo, on the other hand, can be deployed on both cloud-based and on-premises infrastructure, providing flexibility for organizations with specific deployment requirements.

  5. Extensibility: AWS CodeBuild offers a wide range of predefined build environments and also allows users to create custom build environments using Docker images. Bamboo offers less flexibility in terms of build environments, but it provides a rich set of extensions and plugins that can be used to enhance its functionality and integrate with third-party tools.

  6. Support and Documentation: As an AWS service, CodeBuild benefits from the extensive support and documentation provided by AWS. They have a large user community, comprehensive documentation, and dedicated support channels. Bamboo, on the other hand, provides support through Atlassian's standard support channels and has its own documentation resources.

In summary, AWS CodeBuild and Bamboo differ in their pricing models, integration with other tools and systems, scalability, deployment options, extensibility, and support/documentation. Organizations should consider these differences when choosing a continuous integration and delivery tool that best fits their specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo
Bamboo
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

-
Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
Stacks
504
Stacks
443
Followers
549
Followers
485
Votes
17
Votes
43
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
  • 1
    Bad UI
  • 1
    Low community support
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana