Code Inspector vs SonarQube

Overview

SonarQube

Stacks1.9K

Followers2.0K

Votes53

GitHub Stars10.0K

Forks2.1K

Code Inspector

Stacks5

Followers12

Votes0

SonarQube vs Code Inspector: What are the differences?

Code Inspector and SonarQube are both code analysis tools used by developers and teams to maintain code quality. Some key differences between Code Inspector and SonarQube include:

Code Inspection Approach: Code Inspector is a static code analysis tool that focuses on identifying code issues and vulnerabilities by analyzing the source code without actually executing it. It provides automated code reviews and suggests improvements based on coding best practices and industry standards. On the other hand, SonarQube offers both static and dynamic code analysis capabilities. It not only examines the source code but also performs dynamic analysis by executing the code to uncover runtime issues and potential vulnerabilities.
Language Support: Code Inspector has strong language support, covering popular programming languages such as JavaScript, Python, Java, TypeScript, and more. However, it may have a more limited range of supported languages compared to SonarQube, which supports a broader spectrum of programming languages, including some less common or niche ones. This makes SonarQube a more versatile choice for multi-language projects or organizations with diverse tech stacks.
Deployment and Hosted Options: Code Inspector primarily offers cloud-based deployment and can be accessed through the web browser. It is a Software as a Service (SaaS) platform that allows easy setup and quick start for users. On the other hand, SonarQube can be deployed both on-premises and in the cloud. It provides more flexibility in deployment options, which can be advantageous for organizations with specific security or compliance requirements.
Integration Ecosystem: SonarQube has an extensive ecosystem of plugins and integrations with various development tools, version control systems, build automation tools, and CI/CD pipelines. This enables seamless incorporation of code quality checks into the existing development workflow. Code Inspector also offers integrations with popular version control systems, but its ecosystem might not be as extensive as that of SonarQube.
Pricing Model: Code Inspector typically follows a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on the number of users, repositories, and additional features. SonarQube, on the other hand, offers various editions with different feature sets, including a free Community edition, a paid Enterprise edition, and a commercial Data Center edition for large-scale deployments.

In summary, Code Inspector is an automated code review tool that analyzes code quality, security, and performance, providing actionable insights to improve software projects. While SonarQube is a static code analysis and code quality management platform that identifies bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells, helping developers maintain clean and secure codebases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube	Code Inspector
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.	It is a code analysis platform that automates code reviews on Github, Gitlab and Bitbucket by detecting duplicates, violations, and security vulnerabilities in more than 10 programming languages. Improve code quality and manage your technical debt.
Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow	Code Analysis: Automatic detection of Security Vulnerabilities, Duplicates, Violations and Hotspots at every commit or pull request; Integrations: Seamless integration with GitHub, GitLab & BitBucket repositories (public/private); Analytics: Clear and actionable metrics to improve code quality and manage technical debt; APIs: Complete set of APIs to integrate with your CI/CD workflow (e.g. Jenkins, Travis, etc.); Multi-Langue support: C, C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, Shellscript, Scala, Python, PHP, and Ruby; Sharing: Share your statistics publicly or privately with your team to maximize code visibility across projects
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 5
Followers 2.0K	Followers 12
Votes 53	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 26 Tracks code complexity and smell trends 16 IDE Integration 9 Complete code Review 2 Difficult to deploy Cons 7 Sales process is long and unfriendly 7 Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful 1 Does not integrate with Snyk	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins TeamCity Appveyor Travis CI Apache Ant Bamboo	GitHub Bitbucket C++ Scala TypeScript Golang GitLab JavaScript Java Ruby

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, Code Inspector?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

Code Inspection Approach: Code Inspector is a static code analysis tool that focuses on identifying code issues and vulnerabilities by analyzing the source code without actually executing it. It provides automated code reviews and suggests improvements based on coding best practices and industry standards. On the other hand, SonarQube offers both static and dynamic code analysis capabilities. It not only examines the source code but also performs dynamic analysis by executing the code to uncover runtime issues and potential vulnerabilities.
Language Support: Code Inspector has strong language support, covering popular programming languages such as JavaScript, Python, Java, TypeScript, and more. However, it may have a more limited range of supported languages compared to SonarQube, which supports a broader spectrum of programming languages, including some less common or niche ones. This makes SonarQube a more versatile choice for multi-language projects or organizations with diverse tech stacks.
Deployment and Hosted Options: Code Inspector primarily offers cloud-based deployment and can be accessed through the web browser. It is a Software as a Service (SaaS) platform that allows easy setup and quick start for users. On the other hand, SonarQube can be deployed both on-premises and in the cloud. It provides more flexibility in deployment options, which can be advantageous for organizations with specific security or compliance requirements.
Integration Ecosystem: SonarQube has an extensive ecosystem of plugins and integrations with various development tools, version control systems, build automation tools, and CI/CD pipelines. This enables seamless incorporation of code quality checks into the existing development workflow. Code Inspector also offers integrations with popular version control systems, but its ecosystem might not be as extensive as that of SonarQube.
Pricing Model: Code Inspector typically follows a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on the number of users, repositories, and additional features. SonarQube, on the other hand, offers various editions with different feature sets, including a free Community edition, a paid Enterprise edition, and a commercial Data Center edition for large-scale deployments.

Code Inspector vs SonarQube