What are some alternatives to Fork?

What is Fork and what are its top alternatives?

Fork is a comprehensive Git client for Mac and Windows that offers a user-friendly interface and powerful features for managing repositories. It allows users to perform Git operations efficiently, including branching, merging, and collaborating with team members. However, some limitations of Fork include limited customization options and a lack of certain advanced features compared to other Git clients.

GitKraken: GitKraken is a popular Git client known for its visually appealing interface and seamless integrations with popular Git services. Key features include interactive branching, real-time collaboration, and built-in code editor. Pros of GitKraken include smooth user experience and strong team collaboration tools, while cons include a paid subscription for certain advanced features.
SourceTree: SourceTree is a free Git client for Windows and Mac that offers a robust set of features, including visualizing repository branches and history, and supporting GitFlow workflows. Pros of SourceTree include its user-friendly interface and powerful branching capabilities, while cons include occasional performance issues.
GitHub Desktop: GitHub Desktop is an official Git client from GitHub that simplifies the process of contributing to projects on GitHub. Key features include easy repository cloning, seamless pull requests, and visual diffing of code changes. Pros of GitHub Desktop include seamless GitHub integration, while cons include limited support for Git operations compared to other clients.
GitUp: GitUp is a Git client for Mac that focuses on simplicity and speed. It offers a unique timeline view of repository history, intuitive branching and merging, and a minimalistic interface. Pros of GitUp include its innovative approach to visualizing Git history, while cons include limited customization options.
Tower: Tower is a premium Git client for Mac and Windows that provides a powerful set of features for managing repositories. Key features include seamless integration with popular Git services, visual branch management, and a built-in code editor. Pros of Tower include its robust feature set and user-friendly interface, while cons include a higher price point compared to other clients.
SmartGit: SmartGit is a cross-platform Git client that offers a professional-grade set of features for developers. It supports advanced Git operations, including cherry-picking, rebasing, and submodules. Pros of SmartGit include its comprehensive feature set, while cons include a slightly steeper learning curve for beginners.
Magit: Magit is a Git client for Emacs that provides a rich set of features for managing Git repositories within the Emacs text editor. Key features include interactive staging, seamless rebasing, and powerful branching capabilities. Pros of Magit include its deep integration with Emacs, while cons include a potentially steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with Emacs.
Git Cola: Git Cola is a lightweight and fast Git client that offers a simple and customizable interface for managing repositories. It supports a wide range of Git operations, including rebasing, cherry-picking, and visualizing commit history. Pros of Git Cola include its speed and flexibility, while cons include a lack of some advanced features found in other clients.
GitAhead: GitAhead is a free and open-source Git client that provides a clean and intuitive interface for managing repositories. Key features include a visual file history, easy repository navigation, and support for branching and merging. Pros of GitAhead include its open-source nature and clean interface, while cons include occasional stability issues.
GitFiend: GitFiend is a new player in the Git client market that offers a modern and intuitive interface for managing repositories. Key features include visualizing repository history, easy collaboration tools, and simplified branching and merging workflows. Pros of GitFiend include its clean design and user-friendly experience, while cons include a lack of certain advanced features compared to more established clients.

Top Alternatives to Fork

SourceTree
Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface. ...
GitKraken
The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free. ...
Tower
Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive. ...
Sublime Merge
A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits. ...
SmartGit
It is a graphical Git client with support for SVN and Pull Requests for GitHub and Bitbucket. It runs on Windows, macOS and Linux. ...
GitUp
GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting. ...

Fork alternatives & related posts

SourceTree

10.4K

7.9K

727

A free Git GUI client for Windows and macOS

Stacks10.4K

Followers7.9K

+ 1

Votes727

PROS OF SOURCETREE

205
Visual history and branch view
164
Beautiful UI
134
Easy repository browsing
87
Gitflow support
75
Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines
22
Great branch visualization
18
Ui/ux and user-friendliness
8
Best Git Client UI/Features
7
Search commit messages
5
Available for Windows and macOS
1
Log only one file
1
Search file content

CONS OF SOURCETREE

12
Crashes often
8
So many bugs
7
Fetching is slow sometimes
5
No dark theme (Windows)
5
Extremely slow
5
Very unstable
4
Can't select text in diff (windows)
3
Freezes quite frequently
3
Can't scale window from top corners
2
UI blinking
2
Windows version worse than mac version
2
Installs to AppData folder (windows)
2
Diff makes tab indentation look like spaces
2
Windows and Mac versions are very different
2
Diff appears as if space indented even if its tabs
2
Doesn't have an option for git init
2
Useless for merge conflict resolution
2
Doesn't differentiate submodules from parent repos
2
Requires bitbucket account
1
Generally hard to like
1
No reflog support
1
Bases binary check on filesize
1
Can't add remotes by right clicking remotes (windows)

COMPARE

Compare SourceTree vs Fork

related SourceTree posts

Simon Reymann

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · Apr 27, 2020 | 30 upvotes · 8.9M views

Shared insights

QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
Respectively Git as revision control system
SourceTree as Git GUI
Visual Studio Code as IDE
CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
SonarQube as quality gate
Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
Heroku for deploying in test environments
nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
PostgreSQL as preferred database system
Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.

Cees Timmerman

Software Engineer · May 23, 2019 | 6 upvotes · 587.9K views

Shared insights

Tower appears to be between GitKraken and SourceTree in detail, but gave two scary error dialogs when attempting to merge resulted in a conflict. Doing the same in SourceTree just worked and showed the conflict in its handy file view that's always visible (unlike Tower's mere "Merge branch 'X' into develop" message when the commit is selected).

Both GitKraken and Tower lack the commit hash in their history overview, requiring one to select a commit to see it.

GitKraken appears to be the only Windows 10 Git GUI suitable for night shifts, but like Tower is only free for 30 days, unlike SourceTree.

Cees Timmerman on Twitter: "@gittower 2.3.1 (Build 319) not as good as @sourcetree 3.1.3; the latter just works when merging a local branch into a local develop branche, no […]