Alternatives to Pharo logo

Alternatives to Pharo

Smalltalk, Python, Java, Elixir, and Clojure are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Pharo.
40
47
+ 1
44

What is Pharo and what are its top alternatives?

A pure object-oriented programming language and a powerful environment, focused on simplicity and immediate feedback.
Pharo is a tool in the Languages category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Pharo

  • Smalltalk
    Smalltalk

    It is an object-oriented, dynamically typed reflective programming language. It was created as the language underpinning the "new world" of computing exemplified by "human–computer symbiosis". It was designed and created in part for educational use, specifically for constructionist learning. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Java
    Java

    Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere! ...

  • Elixir
    Elixir

    Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain. ...

  • Clojure
    Clojure

    Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system. ...

  • Ruby
    Ruby

    Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming. ...

  • Racket
    Racket

    It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

Pharo alternatives & related posts

Smalltalk logo

Smalltalk

253
0
An object-oriented, dynamically typed reflective programming language
253
0
PROS OF SMALLTALK
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF SMALLTALK
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Smalltalk posts

      Python logo

      Python

      245.2K
      6.9K
      A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
      245.2K
      6.9K
      PROS OF PYTHON
      • 1.2K
        Great libraries
      • 963
        Readable code
      • 847
        Beautiful code
      • 788
        Rapid development
      • 691
        Large community
      • 438
        Open source
      • 393
        Elegant
      • 282
        Great community
      • 273
        Object oriented
      • 221
        Dynamic typing
      • 77
        Great standard library
      • 60
        Very fast
      • 55
        Functional programming
      • 50
        Easy to learn
      • 46
        Scientific computing
      • 35
        Great documentation
      • 29
        Productivity
      • 28
        Matlab alternative
      • 28
        Easy to read
      • 24
        Simple is better than complex
      • 20
        It's the way I think
      • 19
        Imperative
      • 18
        Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
      • 18
        Free
      • 17
        Machine learning support
      • 17
        Powerfull language
      • 16
        Fast and simple
      • 14
        Scripting
      • 12
        Explicit is better than implicit
      • 11
        Ease of development
      • 10
        Clear and easy and powerfull
      • 9
        Unlimited power
      • 8
        Import antigravity
      • 8
        It's lean and fun to code
      • 7
        Print "life is short, use python"
      • 7
        Python has great libraries for data processing
      • 6
        High Documented language
      • 6
        I love snakes
      • 6
        Readability counts
      • 6
        Rapid Prototyping
      • 6
        Now is better than never
      • 6
        Although practicality beats purity
      • 6
        Flat is better than nested
      • 6
        Great for tooling
      • 6
        There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
      • 6
        Fast coding and good for competitions
      • 5
        Web scraping
      • 5
        Lists, tuples, dictionaries
      • 5
        Great for analytics
      • 4
        Beautiful is better than ugly
      • 4
        Easy to learn and use
      • 4
        Easy to setup and run smooth
      • 4
        Multiple Inheritence
      • 4
        CG industry needs
      • 4
        Socially engaged community
      • 4
        Complex is better than complicated
      • 4
        Plotting
      • 4
        Simple and easy to learn
      • 3
        List comprehensions
      • 3
        Powerful language for AI
      • 3
        Flexible and easy
      • 3
        It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
      • 3
        Many types of collections
      • 3
        If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
      • 3
        If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
      • 3
        Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
      • 3
        Pip install everything
      • 3
        No cruft
      • 3
        Generators
      • 3
        Import this
      • 2
        Batteries included
      • 2
        Securit
      • 2
        Can understand easily who are new to programming
      • 2
        Should START with this but not STICK with This
      • 2
        A-to-Z
      • 2
        Because of Netflix
      • 2
        Only one way to do it
      • 2
        Better outcome
      • 2
        Good for hacking
      • 1
        Best friend for NLP
      • 1
        Sexy af
      • 1
        Procedural programming
      • 1
        Automation friendly
      • 1
        Slow
      • 0
        Keep it simple
      • 0
        Powerful
      • 0
        Ni
      CONS OF PYTHON
      • 53
        Still divided between python 2 and python 3
      • 28
        Performance impact
      • 26
        Poor syntax for anonymous functions
      • 22
        GIL
      • 19
        Package management is a mess
      • 14
        Too imperative-oriented
      • 12
        Hard to understand
      • 12
        Dynamic typing
      • 12
        Very slow
      • 8
        Indentations matter a lot
      • 8
        Not everything is expression
      • 7
        Incredibly slow
      • 7
        Explicit self parameter in methods
      • 6
        Requires C functions for dynamic modules
      • 6
        Poor DSL capabilities
      • 6
        No anonymous functions
      • 5
        Fake object-oriented programming
      • 5
        Threading
      • 5
        The "lisp style" whitespaces
      • 5
        Official documentation is unclear.
      • 5
        Hard to obfuscate
      • 5
        Circular import
      • 4
        Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
      • 4
        The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
      • 4
        Not suitable for autocomplete
      • 2
        Meta classes
      • 1
        Training wheels (forced indentation)

      related Python posts

      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 12.7M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more
      Nick Parsons
      Building cool things on the internet 🛠️ at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 4.3M views

      Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

      We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

      We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

      Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

      #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

      See more
      Java logo

      Java

      135.4K
      3.7K
      A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible
      135.4K
      3.7K
      PROS OF JAVA
      • 603
        Great libraries
      • 446
        Widely used
      • 401
        Excellent tooling
      • 396
        Huge amount of documentation available
      • 334
        Large pool of developers available
      • 208
        Open source
      • 203
        Excellent performance
      • 158
        Great development
      • 150
        Used for android
      • 148
        Vast array of 3rd party libraries
      • 60
        Compiled Language
      • 52
        Used for Web
      • 46
        Managed memory
      • 46
        High Performance
      • 45
        Native threads
      • 43
        Statically typed
      • 35
        Easy to read
      • 33
        Great Community
      • 29
        Reliable platform
      • 24
        Sturdy garbage collection
      • 24
        JVM compatibility
      • 22
        Cross Platform Enterprise Integration
      • 20
        Good amount of APIs
      • 20
        Universal platform
      • 18
        Great Support
      • 14
        Great ecosystem
      • 11
        Backward compatible
      • 11
        Lots of boilerplate
      • 10
        Everywhere
      • 9
        Excellent SDK - JDK
      • 7
        Cross-platform
      • 7
        It's Java
      • 7
        Static typing
      • 6
        Portability
      • 6
        Mature language thus stable systems
      • 6
        Better than Ruby
      • 6
        Long term language
      • 5
        Used for Android development
      • 5
        Clojure
      • 5
        Vast Collections Library
      • 4
        Best martial for design
      • 4
        Most developers favorite
      • 4
        Old tech
      • 3
        Testable
      • 3
        History
      • 3
        Javadoc
      • 3
        Stable platform, which many new languages depend on
      • 3
        Great Structure
      • 2
        Faster than python
      • 2
        Type Safe
      • 0
        Job
      CONS OF JAVA
      • 33
        Verbosity
      • 27
        NullpointerException
      • 17
        Nightmare to Write
      • 16
        Overcomplexity is praised in community culture
      • 12
        Boiler plate code
      • 8
        Classpath hell prior to Java 9
      • 6
        No REPL
      • 4
        No property
      • 3
        Code are too long
      • 2
        Non-intuitive generic implementation
      • 2
        There is not optional parameter
      • 2
        Floating-point errors
      • 1
        Java's too statically, stronglly, and strictly typed
      • 1
        Returning Wildcard Types
      • 1
        Terrbible compared to Python/Batch Perormence

      related Java posts

      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 12.7M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more
      Kamil Kowalski
      Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 4.1M views

      When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

      See more
      Elixir logo

      Elixir

      3.4K
      1.3K
      Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications
      3.4K
      1.3K
      PROS OF ELIXIR
      • 174
        Concurrency
      • 162
        Functional
      • 133
        Erlang vm
      • 113
        Great documentation
      • 105
        Great tooling
      • 87
        Immutable data structures
      • 81
        Open source
      • 77
        Pattern-matching
      • 62
        Easy to get started
      • 59
        Actor library
      • 32
        Functional with a neat syntax
      • 29
        Ruby inspired
      • 25
        Erlang evolved
      • 24
        Homoiconic
      • 22
        Beauty of Ruby, Speed of Erlang/C
      • 17
        Fault Tolerant
      • 14
        Simple
      • 13
        High Performance
      • 11
        Doc as first class citizen
      • 11
        Good lang
      • 11
        Pipe Operator
      • 9
        Stinkin' fast, no memory leaks, easy on the eyes
      • 9
        Fun to write
      • 8
        OTP
      • 8
        Resilient to failure
      • 6
        GenServer takes the guesswork out of background work
      • 4
        Pattern matching
      • 4
        Not Swift
      • 4
        Idempotence
      • 4
        Fast, Concurrent with clean error messages
      • 3
        Easy to use
      • 2
        Dynamic Typing
      • 2
        Error isolation
      CONS OF ELIXIR
      • 11
        Fewer jobs for Elixir experts
      • 7
        Smaller userbase than other mainstream languages
      • 5
        Elixir's dot notation less readable ("object": 1st arg)
      • 4
        Dynamic typing
      • 2
        Difficult to understand
      • 1
        Not a lot of learning books available

      related Elixir posts

      Kamil Kowalski
      Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 4.1M views

      When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

      See more
      Sebastian Gębski

      Another major decision was to adopt Elixir and Phoenix Framework - the DX (Developer eXperience) is pretty similar to what we know from RoR, but this tech is running on the top of rock-solid Erlang platform which is powering planet-scale telecom solutions for 20+ years. So we're getting pretty much the best from both worlds: minimum friction & smart conventions that eliminate the excessive boilerplate AND highly concurrent EVM (Erlang's Virtual Machine) that makes all the scalability problems vanish. The transition was very smooth - none of Ruby developers we had decided to leave because of Elixir. What is more, we kept recruiting Ruby developers w/o any requirement regarding Elixir proficiency & we still were able to educate them internally in almost no time. Obviously Elixir comes with some more tools in the stack: Credo , Hex , AppSignal (required to properly monitor BEAM apps).

      See more
      Clojure logo

      Clojure

      1.9K
      1.1K
      A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine
      1.9K
      1.1K
      PROS OF CLOJURE
      • 117
        It is a lisp
      • 100
        Persistent data structures
      • 100
        Concise syntax
      • 90
        jvm-based language
      • 89
        Concurrency
      • 81
        Interactive repl
      • 76
        Code is data
      • 61
        Open source
      • 61
        Lazy data structures
      • 57
        Macros
      • 49
        Functional
      • 23
        Simplistic
      • 22
        Immutable by default
      • 20
        Excellent collections
      • 19
        Fast-growing community
      • 15
        Multiple host languages
      • 15
        Simple (not easy!)
      • 15
        Practical Lisp
      • 10
        Because it's really fun to use
      • 10
        Addictive
      • 9
        Community
      • 9
        Web friendly
      • 9
        Rapid development
      • 9
        It creates Reusable code
      • 8
        Minimalist
      • 6
        Programmable programming language
      • 6
        Java interop
      • 5
        Regained interest in programming
      • 4
        Compiles to JavaScript
      • 3
        Share a lot of code with clojurescript/use on frontend
      • 3
        EDN
      • 1
        Clojurescript
      CONS OF CLOJURE
      • 11
        Cryptic stacktraces
      • 5
        Need to wrap basically every java lib
      • 4
        Toxic community
      • 3
        Good code heavily relies on local conventions
      • 3
        Tonns of abandonware
      • 3
        Slow application startup
      • 1
        Usable only with REPL
      • 1
        Hiring issues
      • 1
        It's a lisp
      • 1
        Bad documented libs
      • 1
        Macros are overused by devs
      • 1
        Tricky profiling
      • 1
        IDE with high learning curve
      • 1
        Configuration bolierplate
      • 1
        Conservative community
      • 0
        Have no good and fast fmt

      related Clojure posts

      Jake Stein

      Stitch is run entirely on AWS. All of our transactional databases are run with Amazon RDS, and we rely on Amazon S3 for data persistence in various stages of our pipeline. Our product integrates with Amazon Redshift as a data destination, and we also use Redshift as an internal data warehouse (powered by Stitch, of course).

      The majority of our services run on stateless Amazon EC2 instances that are managed by AWS OpsWorks. We recently introduced Kubernetes into our infrastructure to run the scheduled jobs that execute Singer code to extract data from various sources. Although we tend to be wary of shiny new toys, Kubernetes has proven to be a good fit for this problem, and its stability, strong community and helpful tooling have made it easy for us to incorporate into our operations.

      While we continue to be happy with Clojure for our internal services, we felt that its relatively narrow adoption could impede Singer's growth. We chose Python both because it is well suited to the task, and it seems to have reached critical mass among data engineers. All that being said, the Singer spec is language agnostic, and integrations and libraries have been developed in JavaScript, Go, and Clojure.

      See more
      Robert Zuber
      Shared insights
      on
      CircleCICircleCIClojureClojureRailsRails
      at

      Most of CircleCI is written in Clojure and it has been this way since almost the beginning. Early development included Rails, but by the time that CircleCI was released to the public, it was written entirely in Clojure. Clojure is still at our platform’s core. It helps having a common language across much of our stack to allow for our engineers to move between layers of the stack without much overhead.

      See more
      Ruby logo

      Ruby

      41.9K
      4K
      A dynamic, interpreted, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity
      41.9K
      4K
      PROS OF RUBY
      • 607
        Programme friendly
      • 538
        Quick to develop
      • 492
        Great community
      • 469
        Productivity
      • 432
        Simplicity
      • 274
        Open source
      • 235
        Meta-programming
      • 208
        Powerful
      • 157
        Blocks
      • 140
        Powerful one-liners
      • 70
        Flexible
      • 59
        Easy to learn
      • 52
        Easy to start
      • 42
        Maintainability
      • 38
        Lambdas
      • 31
        Procs
      • 21
        Fun to write
      • 19
        Diverse web frameworks
      • 14
        Reads like English
      • 10
        Makes me smarter and happier
      • 9
        Rails
      • 9
        Elegant syntax
      • 8
        Very Dynamic
      • 7
        Matz
      • 6
        Programmer happiness
      • 5
        Object Oriented
      • 4
        Elegant code
      • 4
        Friendly
      • 4
        Generally fun but makes you wanna cry sometimes
      • 4
        Fun and useful
      • 3
        There are so many ways to make it do what you want
      • 3
        Easy packaging and modules
      • 2
        Primitive types can be tampered with
      CONS OF RUBY
      • 7
        Memory hog
      • 7
        Really slow if you're not really careful
      • 3
        Nested Blocks can make code unreadable
      • 2
        Encouraging imperative programming
      • 1
        No type safety, so it requires copious testing
      • 1
        Ambiguous Syntax, such as function parentheses

      related Ruby posts

      Kamil Kowalski
      Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 4.1M views

      When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

      See more
      Jonathan Pugh
      Software Engineer / Project Manager / Technical Architect · | 25 upvotes · 3M views

      I needed to choose a full stack of tools for cross platform mobile application design & development. After much research and trying different tools, these are what I came up with that work for me today:

      For the client coding I chose Framework7 because of its performance, easy learning curve, and very well designed, beautiful UI widgets. I think it's perfect for solo development or small teams. I didn't like React Native. It felt heavy to me and rigid. Framework7 allows the use of #CSS3, which I think is the best technology to come out of the #WWW movement. No other tech has been able to allow designers and developers to develop such flexible, high performance, customisable user interface elements that are highly responsive and hardware accelerated before. Now #CSS3 includes variables and flexboxes it is truly a powerful language and there is no longer a need for preprocessors such as #SCSS / #Sass / #less. React Native contains a very limited interpretation of #CSS3 which I found very frustrating after using #CSS3 for some years already and knowing its powerful features. The other very nice feature of Framework7 is that you can even build for the browser if you want your app to be available for desktop web browsers. The latest release also includes the ability to build for #Electron so you can have MacOS, Windows and Linux desktop apps. This is not possible with React Native yet.

      Framework7 runs on top of Apache Cordova. Cordova and webviews have been slated as being slow in the past. Having a game developer background I found the tweeks to make it run as smooth as silk. One of those tweeks is to use WKWebView. Another important one was using srcset on images.

      I use #Template7 for the for the templating system which is a no-nonsense mobile-centric #HandleBars style extensible templating system. It's easy to write custom helpers for, is fast and has a small footprint. I'm not forced into a new paradigm or learning some new syntax. It operates with standard JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS 3. It's written by the developer of Framework7 and so dovetails with it as expected.

      I configured TypeScript to work with the latest version of Framework7. I consider TypeScript to be one of the best creations to come out of Microsoft in some time. They must have an amazing team working on it. It's very powerful and flexible. It helps you catch a lot of bugs and also provides code completion in supporting IDEs. So for my IDE I use Visual Studio Code which is a blazingly fast and silky smooth editor that integrates seamlessly with TypeScript for the ultimate type checking setup (both products are produced by Microsoft).

      I use Webpack and Babel to compile the JavaScript. TypeScript can compile to JavaScript directly but Babel offers a few more options and polyfills so you can use the latest (and even prerelease) JavaScript features today and compile to be backwards compatible with virtually any browser. My favorite recent addition is "optional chaining" which greatly simplifies and increases readability of a number of sections of my code dealing with getting and setting data in nested objects.

      I use some Ruby scripts to process images with ImageMagick and pngquant to optimise for size and even auto insert responsive image code into the HTML5. Ruby is the ultimate cross platform scripting language. Even as your scripts become large, Ruby allows you to refactor your code easily and make it Object Oriented if necessary. I find it the quickest and easiest way to maintain certain aspects of my build process.

      For the user interface design and prototyping I use Figma. Figma has an almost identical user interface to #Sketch but has the added advantage of being cross platform (MacOS and Windows). Its real-time collaboration features are outstanding and I use them a often as I work mostly on remote projects. Clients can collaborate in real-time and see changes I make as I make them. The clickable prototyping features in Figma are also very well designed and mean I can send clickable prototypes to clients to try user interface updates as they are made and get immediate feedback. I'm currently also evaluating the latest version of #AdobeXD as an alternative to Figma as it has the very cool auto-animate feature. It doesn't have real-time collaboration yet, but I heard it is proposed for 2019.

      For the UI icons I use Font Awesome Pro. They have the largest selection and best looking icons you can find on the internet with several variations in styles so you can find most of the icons you want for standard projects.

      For the backend I was using the #GraphCool Framework. As I later found out, #GraphQL still has some way to go in order to provide the full power of a mature graph query language so later in my project I ripped out #GraphCool and replaced it with CouchDB and Pouchdb. Primarily so I could provide good offline app support. CouchDB with Pouchdb is very flexible and efficient combination and overcomes some of the restrictions I found in #GraphQL and hence #GraphCool also. The most impressive and important feature of CouchDB is its replication. You can configure it in various ways for backups, fault tolerance, caching or conditional merging of databases. CouchDB and Pouchdb even supports storing, retrieving and serving binary or image data or other mime types. This removes a level of complexity usually present in database implementations where binary or image data is usually referenced through an #HTML5 link. With CouchDB and Pouchdb apps can operate offline and sync later, very efficiently, when the network connection is good.

      I use PhoneGap when testing the app. It auto-reloads your app when its code is changed and you can also install it on Android phones to preview your app instantly. iOS is a bit more tricky cause of Apple's policies so it's not available on the App Store, but you can build it and install it yourself to your device.

      So that's my latest mobile stack. What tools do you use? Have you tried these ones?

      See more
      Racket logo

      Racket

      89
      54
      A general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language
      89
      54
      PROS OF RACKET
      • 4
        Meta-programming
      • 3
        Hygienic macros
      • 2
        FFI
      • 2
        Great libraries
      • 2
        Beautiful code
      • 2
        Rapid development
      • 2
        Fast
      • 2
        Gradual typing
      • 2
        Nanopass compiler
      • 2
        Extensible
      • 2
        Racket Macro system
      • 2
        Cross platform GUI
      • 2
        Module system
      • 2
        Macro Stepper
      • 2
        Beginner friendly
      • 2
        Built-in concurrency
      • 2
        Built-in parallelism
      • 2
        Functional Programming
      • 2
        Open source
      • 2
        Language-oriented programming
      • 2
        Pattern matching
      • 1
        Easy syntax
      • 1
        Type inference
      • 1
        Static type-checker
      • 1
        Racketscript
      • 1
        Great community
      • 1
        IDE
      • 1
        Typed Racket
      • 1
        Good documentation
      • 1
        Efficient compiler
      CONS OF RACKET
      • 2
        LISP BASED
      • 2
        No GitHub

      related Racket posts

      JavaScript logo

      JavaScript

      361.4K
      8.1K
      Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
      361.4K
      8.1K
      PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
      • 1.7K
        Can be used on frontend/backend
      • 1.5K
        It's everywhere
      • 1.2K
        Lots of great frameworks
      • 898
        Fast
      • 746
        Light weight
      • 425
        Flexible
      • 392
        You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
      • 286
        Non-blocking i/o
      • 237
        Ubiquitousness
      • 191
        Expressive
      • 55
        Extended functionality to web pages
      • 49
        Relatively easy language
      • 46
        Executed on the client side
      • 30
        Relatively fast to the end user
      • 25
        Pure Javascript
      • 21
        Functional programming
      • 15
        Async
      • 13
        Full-stack
      • 12
        Future Language of The Web
      • 12
        Setup is easy
      • 12
        Its everywhere
      • 11
        Because I love functions
      • 11
        JavaScript is the New PHP
      • 10
        Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
      • 9
        Easy
      • 9
        Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
      • 9
        Expansive community
      • 9
        Everyone use it
      • 8
        Easy to hire developers
      • 8
        Most Popular Language in the World
      • 8
        For the good parts
      • 8
        Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
      • 8
        No need to use PHP
      • 8
        Powerful
      • 7
        Evolution of C
      • 7
        Its fun and fast
      • 7
        It's fun
      • 7
        Nice
      • 7
        Versitile
      • 7
        Hard not to use
      • 7
        Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
      • 7
        Agile, packages simple to use
      • 7
        Supports lambdas and closures
      • 7
        Love-hate relationship
      • 7
        Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
      • 6
        1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
      • 6
        Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
      • 6
        It let's me use Babel & Typescript
      • 6
        Easy to make something
      • 6
        Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
      • 5
        Client processing
      • 5
        What to add
      • 5
        Everywhere
      • 5
        Scope manipulation
      • 5
        Function expressions are useful for callbacks
      • 5
        Stockholm Syndrome
      • 5
        Promise relationship
      • 5
        Clojurescript
      • 4
        Only Programming language on browser
      • 4
        Because it is so simple and lightweight
      • 1
        Easy to learn and test
      • 1
        Easy to understand
      • 1
        Not the best
      • 1
        Subskill #4
      • 1
        Hard to learn
      • 1
        Test2
      • 1
        Test
      • 1
        Easy to learn
      • 0
        Hard 彤
      CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
      • 22
        A constant moving target, too much churn
      • 20
        Horribly inconsistent
      • 15
        Javascript is the New PHP
      • 9
        No ability to monitor memory utilitization
      • 8
        Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
      • 7
        Thinks strange results are better than errors
      • 6
        Can be ugly
      • 3
        No GitHub
      • 2
        Slow
      • 0
        HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

      related JavaScript posts

      Zach Holman

      Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

      But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

      But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

      Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

      See more
      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 12.7M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more