StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. PHPStan vs SonarQube

PHPStan vs SonarQube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
PHPStan
PHPStan
Stacks418
Followers99
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.7K
Forks933

PHPStan vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Comparison between PHPStan and SonarQube

  1. Static Analysis: PHPStan is a static analysis tool specifically designed for PHP that provides detailed and accurate results for code analysis. It performs type inference and detects potential bugs, unused variables, and unreachable code. On the other hand, SonarQube is a more general static analysis tool that supports multiple programming languages, but it does not provide the same level of accuracy and specificity as PHPStan for PHP code.

  2. Custom Rules: PHPStan allows developers to define and use their own custom rules and coding standards. It provides a way to extend its built-in rules and add additional checks tailored to specific project requirements. In contrast, SonarQube has a limited number of built-in rules and customization options, making it less flexible for enforcing specific coding standards.

  3. Integration: PHPStan seamlessly integrates with popular PHP frameworks and tools, such as PHPUnit and Laravel, providing more accurate analysis and code validation within the context of these frameworks. SonarQube, while it supports PHP, does not offer the same level of integration with specific PHP frameworks, which may result in less accurate analysis and limited understanding of the codebase.

  4. Real-time Analysis: PHPStan enables developers to perform real-time code analysis by integrating it with their IDEs. It provides instant feedback on code quality and potential issues while writing code, allowing developers to address them before committing to the repository. SonarQube, on the other hand, is typically used as a separate process that analyzes the codebase at set intervals, making it less effective for real-time analysis during code development.

  5. Scalability: PHPStan is lightweight and can be easily integrated into existing development workflows. It is suitable for small to medium-sized projects and does not require significant computational resources. SonarQube, on the other hand, is more resource-intensive and is designed to handle large-scale codebases. It can analyze and track code quality metrics for complex projects, making it more suitable for enterprise-level applications.

  6. Reporting and Visualization: SonarQube provides comprehensive and visually appealing reports and dashboards that give an overview of code quality and maintainability. It offers various metrics and charts that help identify areas for improvement and track progress over time. PHPStan, although it generates detailed analysis results, does not offer the same level of reporting and visualization capabilities as SonarQube.

In summary, PHPStan is a specialized and highly accurate static analysis tool specifically designed for PHP code. It offers customizable rules and integrates well with PHP frameworks, providing real-time analysis and instant feedback during code development. On the other hand, SonarQube is a more general static analysis tool that supports multiple languages, but it lacks the same level of accuracy, customization, and integration for PHP code as PHPStan. It excels in scalability and provides comprehensive reporting and visualization features for monitoring code quality in large-scale projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
PHPStan
PHPStan

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

It focuses on finding errors in your code without actually running it. It catches whole classes of bugs even before you write tests for the code. It moves PHP closer to compiled languages in the sense that the correctness of each line of the code can be checked before you run the actual line.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
Static Analysis Tool ;Focuses on finding errors in your code without actually running it;Extensible;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
13.7K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
933
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
418
Followers
2.0K
Followers
99
Votes
53
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
Drupal
Drupal
WordPress
WordPress
Laravel
Laravel
PHP
PHP
Symfony
Symfony
Yii
Yii
Nette Framework
Nette Framework
Typo3
Typo3
Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Doctrine 2
Doctrine 2

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, PHPStan?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana