Alternatives to PrimeNg logo

Alternatives to PrimeNg

Bootstrap, Angular Material , Material Design, Material, and PrimeFaces are the most popular alternatives and competitors to PrimeNg.
146
283
+ 1
15

What is PrimeNg and what are its top alternatives?

PrimeNg is a popular open-source UI library for Angular applications that provides a wide range of rich UI components. It offers a variety of features such as responsive design, accessibility, and theming capabilities to create modern and user-friendly interfaces. However, some limitations of PrimeNg include a steep learning curve for beginners and occasional compatibility issues with different Angular versions.

  1. Angular Material: Angular Material is another UI component library for Angular applications with a focus on Material Design principles. Key features include a wide range of components, theming support, and seamless integration with Angular. Pros of Angular Material include a consistent design language and strong community support, while cons include limited customization options compared to PrimeNg.

  2. Kendo UI for Angular: Kendo UI for Angular provides a comprehensive set of UI components for building modern web applications. Key features include data visualization components, responsive design, and rich editing tools. Pros of Kendo UI include extensive documentation and professional support, while cons include a licensing cost for commercial projects.

  3. Clarity UI: Clarity UI is an open-source design system for Angular applications that offers a set of declarative components for building consistent and accessible user interfaces. Key features include modular architecture, accessibility compliance, and out-of-the-box Angular integration. Pros of Clarity UI include a focus on user experience and accessibility, while cons include a smaller component library compared to PrimeNg.

  4. NG Bootstrap: NG Bootstrap is a library that provides Bootstrap components built specifically for Angular applications. Key features include easy integration with Angular, responsive design, and a familiar Bootstrap styling. Pros of NG Bootstrap include seamless migration for developers already familiar with Bootstrap, while cons include a limited range of components compared to PrimeNg.

  5. Element UI: Element UI is a Vue.js component library that also offers support for Angular applications. Key features include a wide variety of components, customizable themes, and internationalization support. Pros of Element UI include a clean and modern design, while cons include potential compatibility issues when using it with Angular.

  6. Semanti UI: Semantic UI is a popular front-end development framework that provides a wide range of UI components for building responsive and semantic web interfaces. Key features include a sleek design, responsive layout, and extensive theming options. Pros of Semantic UI include a large community and active development, while cons include a lack of native Angular support.

  7. Carbon Design System: Carbon Design System is an open-source design system from IBM that offers a library of components and resources for building digital products. Key features include accessibility compliance, theming support, and a focus on enterprise-scale applications. Pros of Carbon Design System include a strong emphasis on accessibility and usability, while cons include a potentially higher learning curve compared to PrimeNg.

  8. Onsen UI: Onsen UI is a mobile-focused UI library for hybrid and mobile web applications. Key features include a wide range of mobile components, native-like performance, and Angular integration. Pros of Onsen UI include a focus on mobile user experience, while cons include a potentially limited use case for desktop web applications.

  9. Syncfusion Angular UI Components: Syncfusion offers a comprehensive suite of Angular UI components for building responsive web applications. Key features include a wide range of components, performance optimization, and customizable themes. Pros of Syncfusion Angular UI Components include professional support and feature-rich components, while cons include a licensing cost for commercial projects.

  10. Ant Design: Ant Design is a React UI library that also provides support for Angular applications through NG-Zorro. Key features include a wide variety of components, design consistency, and responsive layout. Pros of Ant Design include a rich set of components and a modern design language, while cons include potential integration challenges when using it with Angular.

Top Alternatives to PrimeNg

  • Bootstrap
    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

  • Angular Material
    Angular Material

    Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy. ...

  • Material Design
    Material Design

    Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences. ...

  • Material
    Material

    Express your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift. ...

  • PrimeFaces
    PrimeFaces

    It is a popular open source framework for JavaServer Faces featuring over 100 components, touch optimized mobilekit, client side validation, theme engine and more. ...

  • PrimeReact
    PrimeReact

    PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

  • Kendo UI
    Kendo UI

    Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

PrimeNg alternatives & related posts

Bootstrap logo

Bootstrap

55.4K
13.1K
7.7K
Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
55.4K
13.1K
+ 1
7.7K
PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 1.6K
    Responsiveness
  • 1.2K
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
  • 472
    HTML, CSS, and JS framework
  • 411
    Open source
  • 375
    Widely used
  • 368
    Customizable
  • 242
    HTML framework
  • 77
    Mobile first
  • 77
    Popular
  • 77
    Easy setup
  • 57
    Great grid system
  • 52
    Great community
  • 38
    Future compatibility
  • 34
    Integration
  • 28
    Very powerful foundational front-end framework
  • 24
    Standard
  • 23
    Javascript plugins
  • 19
    Build faster prototypes
  • 18
    Preprocessors
  • 14
    Grids
  • 9
    Good for a person who hates CSS
  • 8
    Clean
  • 4
    Easy to setup and learn
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Love it
  • 3
    Great and easy to use
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Devin schumacher rules
  • 2
    Boostrap
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Provide angular wrapper
  • 2
    Great and easy
  • 2
    Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Popularity
  • 2
    Clean and quick frontend development
  • 2
    Great and easy to make a responsive website
  • 2
    Sprzedam opla
  • 1
    Painless front end development
  • 1
    Love the classes?
  • 1
    Responsive design
  • 1
    Poop
  • 1
    So clean and simple
  • 1
    Design Agnostic
  • 1
    Numerous components
  • 1
    Material-ui
  • 1
    Recognizable
  • 1
    Intuitive
  • 1
    Vue
  • 1
    Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
  • 1
    Pre-Defined components
  • 1
    It's fast
  • 1
    Geo
  • 1
    Not tied to jQuery
  • 1
    The fame
  • 1
    Easy setup2
CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
  • 1
    Super heavy

related Bootstrap posts

Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 4.8M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Francisco Quintero
Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 1.6M views

For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

See more
Angular Material  logo

Angular Material

621
752
32
Easy to use material design for angular
621
752
+ 1
32
PROS OF ANGULAR MATERIAL
  • 12
    Components
  • 8
    Backed by a well known company
  • 4
    Simple
  • 3
    Easy
  • 2
    Very good documentation
  • 2
    Rte
  • 1
    Implements well known material design
CONS OF ANGULAR MATERIAL
  • 4
    Fairly large
  • 2
    Look like 90s stuffs
  • 2
    Suck
  • 2
    Shit

related Angular Material posts

I am a novice to AngularJS, but I have a strong web development background. I need help with the pros and cons of choosing the Angular Material or PrimeNg for our new application. Our new application will be using Angular for the front-end and .NET Core for the Web API. I looked at both tools and leaned toward Angular Material. It would be beneficial if I could obtain some expert advice from the community.

See more
Babak Khademi
Frontend Developer at Freelance · | 2 upvotes · 181.7K views

What is the best and fastest developing UI CSS Framework to couple with Angular Material ? Mostly for making responsive components and writing less sass. I have Bootstrap and Tailwind CSS in mind.

See more
Material Design logo

Material Design

595
888
14
Google's Material Design
595
888
+ 1
14
PROS OF MATERIAL DESIGN
  • 5
    They really set a new bar in design
  • 4
    An intuitive design
  • 3
    Simply, And Beautiful
  • 2
    Many great libraries
  • 0
    Composants
CONS OF MATERIAL DESIGN
  • 2
    Sometimes, it can hang the browser

related Material Design posts

Giordanna De Gregoriis
Jr Fullstack Developer at Stefanini Inspiring · | 8 upvotes · 471.7K views

TL;DR: Shall I keep developing with Nuxt.js 2 and wait for a migration guide to Nuxt 3? Or start developing with Vue.js 3 using Vite, and then migrate to Nuxt 3 when it comes out?

Long version: We have an old web application running on AngularJS and Bootstrap for frontend. It is mostly a user interface to easily read and post data to our engine.

We want to redo this web application. Started from scratch using the newest version of Angular 2+ and Material Design for frontend. We haven't even finished rewriting half of the application and it is becoming dreadful to work on.

  • The cold start takes too much time
  • Every little change reload the whole page. Seconds to minutes of development lost looking at a loading blank page just changing css
  • Code maintainability is getting worse... again... as the application grows, since we must create everytime 5 files for a new page (html, component.ts, module.ts, scss, routing.ts)

I'm currently trying to code a Proof of Concept using Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS. But the thing is, Vue.js 3 is out and has interesting features such as the composition API, teleport and fragments. Also we wish to use the Vite frontend tooling, to improve our time developing regardless of our application size. It feels like a better alternative to Webpack, which is what Nuxt 2 uses.

I'm already trying Nuxt.js with the nuxt-vite experimental module, but many nuxt modules are still incompatible from the time I'm posting this. It is also becoming cumbersome not being able to use teleport or fragments, but that can be circumvented with good components.

What I'm asking is, what should be the wisest decision: keep developing with Nuxt 2 and wait for a migration guide to Nuxt 3? Or start developing with Vue.js 3 using Vite, and then migrate to Nuxt 3 when it comes out?

See more
Ashish Sharma
Sr. UI Associate at Daffodil Software · | 5 upvotes · 705.9K views

I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?

Any suggestion would be appreciated?

See more
Material logo

Material

93
87
3
A Graphics Framework for Material Design in Swift
93
87
+ 1
3
PROS OF MATERIAL
  • 1
    Good Documentation
  • 1
    Samples included
  • 1
    IOS benefits
CONS OF MATERIAL
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Material posts

    PrimeFaces logo

    PrimeFaces

    111
    189
    4
    An open-source user interface component library
    111
    189
    + 1
    4
    PROS OF PRIMEFACES
    • 2
      JEE Integration
    • 1
      Support Contract available
    • 1
      Nice Components
    CONS OF PRIMEFACES
    • 1
      JSF
    • 1
      Some components have to be bought

    related PrimeFaces posts

    Hello, I need to create a website using Java frameworks, the website must pull data from different mssql views , I'm thinking of using Spring Boot+PrimeFaces but someone suggested I should use Thymeleaf instead of primefaces, I don't have any experience in either, so I'm wondering if someone has some advice based on their own experience? thanks!

    See more

    I need to modernize a Java web application that runs on JSF. I am used to building websites, so Bootstrap kinda feels like "home." But when it comes to applications, I feel Bootstrap is not the right way to go. Can someone explain to me what PrimeFaces is capable of in comparison with BS?

    See more
    PrimeReact logo

    PrimeReact

    31
    197
    18
    A collection of rich UI components for React
    31
    197
    + 1
    18
    PROS OF PRIMEREACT
    • 12
      Editable Table/Tree Table Component in core
    • 2
      Open Source
    • 2
      React
    • 2
      UI Components
    CONS OF PRIMEREACT
    • 1
      MaterialUI is old shit
    • 1
      NO CONS

    related PrimeReact posts

    Kendo UI logo

    Kendo UI

    288
    358
    33
    Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset
    288
    358
    + 1
    33
    PROS OF KENDO UI
    • 15
      Collection of controls
    • 5
      Speed
    • 4
      Multi-framework support
    • 4
      Mobile
    • 2
      AngularJS
    • 2
      Built-in router
    • 1
      Good Documentation
    CONS OF KENDO UI
    • 4
      Massive footprint
    • 3
      Slow
    • 1
      Awdawd
    • 1
      Spotty Documentation
    • 1
      Expensive
    • 1
      Poor customizability

    related Kendo UI posts

    Doug Pet
    Shared insights
    on
    Kendo UIKendo UIReactReact

    We are transitioning to develop a web app, and we have selected to use React for our front end. I've looked at Kendo UI as a tool to help out. I am looking for some feedback on the Kendo UI tool and any others that are good. The desktop software that we are replacing has about 150 forms. The app is currently only going to be used inhouse and is connected to SQL server. Thanks in advance!

    See more
    JavaScript logo

    JavaScript

    354.1K
    269.3K
    8.1K
    Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
    354.1K
    269.3K
    + 1
    8.1K
    PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 1.7K
      Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 1.5K
      It's everywhere
    • 1.2K
      Lots of great frameworks
    • 897
      Fast
    • 745
      Light weight
    • 425
      Flexible
    • 392
      You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
    • 286
      Non-blocking i/o
    • 237
      Ubiquitousness
    • 191
      Expressive
    • 55
      Extended functionality to web pages
    • 49
      Relatively easy language
    • 46
      Executed on the client side
    • 30
      Relatively fast to the end user
    • 25
      Pure Javascript
    • 21
      Functional programming
    • 15
      Async
    • 13
      Full-stack
    • 12
      Setup is easy
    • 12
      Future Language of The Web
    • 12
      Its everywhere
    • 11
      Because I love functions
    • 11
      JavaScript is the New PHP
    • 10
      Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
    • 9
      Expansive community
    • 9
      Everyone use it
    • 9
      Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
    • 9
      Easy
    • 8
      Most Popular Language in the World
    • 8
      Powerful
    • 8
      Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
    • 8
      For the good parts
    • 8
      No need to use PHP
    • 8
      Easy to hire developers
    • 7
      Agile, packages simple to use
    • 7
      Love-hate relationship
    • 7
      Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
    • 7
      Evolution of C
    • 7
      It's fun
    • 7
      Hard not to use
    • 7
      Versitile
    • 7
      Its fun and fast
    • 7
      Nice
    • 7
      Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
    • 7
      Supports lambdas and closures
    • 6
      It let's me use Babel & Typescript
    • 6
      Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
    • 6
      1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 6
      Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
    • 6
      Easy to make something
    • 5
      Clojurescript
    • 5
      Promise relationship
    • 5
      Stockholm Syndrome
    • 5
      Function expressions are useful for callbacks
    • 5
      Scope manipulation
    • 5
      Everywhere
    • 5
      Client processing
    • 5
      What to add
    • 4
      Because it is so simple and lightweight
    • 4
      Only Programming language on browser
    • 1
      Test
    • 1
      Hard to learn
    • 1
      Test2
    • 1
      Not the best
    • 1
      Easy to understand
    • 1
      Subskill #4
    • 1
      Easy to learn
    • 0
      Hard 彤
    CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 22
      A constant moving target, too much churn
    • 20
      Horribly inconsistent
    • 15
      Javascript is the New PHP
    • 9
      No ability to monitor memory utilitization
    • 8
      Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
    • 7
      Thinks strange results are better than errors
    • 6
      Can be ugly
    • 3
      No GitHub
    • 2
      Slow
    • 0
      HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

    related JavaScript posts

    Zach Holman

    Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

    But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

    But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

    Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

    See more
    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 11.1M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more