Alternatives to Spring Batch logo

Alternatives to Spring Batch

Hadoop, Talend, Node.js, ASP.NET, and Django are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Spring Batch.
41
28
+ 1
0

What is Spring Batch and what are its top alternatives?

It is designed to enable the development of robust batch applications vital for the daily operations of enterprise systems. It also provides reusable functions that are essential in processing large volumes of records, including logging/tracing, transaction management, job processing statistics, job restart, skip, and resource management.
Spring Batch is a tool in the Frameworks (Full Stack) category of a tech stack.
Spring Batch is an open source tool with 1.5K GitHub stars and 1.5K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Spring Batch's open source repository on GitHub

Spring Batch alternatives & related posts

Hadoop logo

Hadoop

1.3K
1.1K
48
1.3K
1.1K
+ 1
48
Open-source software for reliable, scalable, distributed computing
Hadoop logo
Hadoop
VS
Spring Batch logo
Spring Batch

related Hadoop posts

StackShare Editors
StackShare Editors
| 4 upvotes · 193K views
atUber TechnologiesUber Technologies
Kafka
Kafka
Kibana
Kibana
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Logstash
Logstash
Hadoop
Hadoop

With interactions across each other and mobile devices, logging is important as it is information for internal cases like debugging and business cases like dynamic pricing.

With multiple Kafka clusters, data is archived into Hadoop before expiration. Data is ingested in realtime and indexed into an ELK stack. The ELK stack comprises of Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana for searching and visualization.

See more
StackShare Editors
StackShare Editors
Prometheus
Prometheus
Chef
Chef
Consul
Consul
Memcached
Memcached
Hack
Hack
Swift
Swift
Hadoop
Hadoop
Terraform
Terraform
Airflow
Airflow
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
gRPC
gRPC
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
Presto
Presto
Kotlin
Kotlin
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift

Since the beginning, Cal Henderson has been the CTO of Slack. Earlier this year, he commented on a Quora question summarizing their current stack.

Apps
  • Web: a mix of JavaScript/ES6 and React.
  • Desktop: And Electron to ship it as a desktop application.
  • Android: a mix of Java and Kotlin.
  • iOS: written in a mix of Objective C and Swift.
Backend
  • The core application and the API written in PHP/Hack that runs on HHVM.
  • The data is stored in MySQL using Vitess.
  • Caching is done using Memcached and MCRouter.
  • The search service takes help from SolrCloud, with various Java services.
  • The messaging system uses WebSockets with many services in Java and Go.
  • Load balancing is done using HAproxy with Consul for configuration.
  • Most services talk to each other over gRPC,
  • Some Thrift and JSON-over-HTTP
  • Voice and video calling service was built in Elixir.
Data warehouse
  • Built using open source tools including Presto, Spark, Airflow, Hadoop and Kafka.
Etc
See more
Talend logo

Talend

34
23
0
34
23
+ 1
0
A single, unified suite for all integration needs
    Be the first to leave a pro
    Talend logo
    Talend
    VS
    Spring Batch logo
    Spring Batch
    Node.js logo

    Node.js

    37.2K
    31.1K
    8K
    37.2K
    31.1K
    + 1
    8K
    A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
    Node.js logo
    Node.js
    VS
    Spring Batch logo
    Spring Batch

    related Node.js posts

    Nick Parsons
    Nick Parsons
    Director of Developer Marketing at Stream · | 34 upvotes · 505.9K views
    atStreamStream
    Stream
    Stream
    Go
    Go
    JavaScript
    JavaScript
    ES6
    ES6
    Node.js
    Node.js
    Babel
    Babel
    Yarn
    Yarn
    Python
    Python
    #FrameworksFullStack
    #Languages

    Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

    We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

    We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

    Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

    #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

    See more
    Nick Rockwell
    Nick Rockwell
    CTO at NY Times · | 29 upvotes · 634.7K views
    atThe New York TimesThe New York Times
    MySQL
    MySQL
    PHP
    PHP
    React
    React
    Apollo
    Apollo
    GraphQL
    GraphQL
    Node.js
    Node.js
    Kafka
    Kafka
    Apache HTTP Server
    Apache HTTP Server

    When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

    So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

    React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

    Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

    See more
    ASP.NET logo

    ASP.NET

    13.4K
    676
    0
    13.4K
    676
    + 1
    0
    An open source web framework for building modern web apps and services with .NET
      Be the first to leave a pro
      ASP.NET logo
      ASP.NET
      VS
      Spring Batch logo
      Spring Batch

      related ASP.NET posts

      Greg Neumann
      Greg Neumann
      Indie, Solo, Developer · | 6 upvotes · 286.4K views
      Xamarin
      Xamarin
      .NET Core
      .NET Core
      Xamarin Forms
      Xamarin Forms
      ASP.NET
      ASP.NET
      Quasar Framework
      Quasar Framework
      Electron
      Electron
      Vue.js
      Vue.js
      TypeScript
      TypeScript

      Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

      This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

      But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

      I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

      Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

      See more
      Heroku
      Heroku
      Netlify
      Netlify
      Vue.js
      Vue.js
      Angular 2
      Angular 2
      React
      React
      ExpressJS
      ExpressJS
      vuex
      vuex
      Puppeteer
      Puppeteer
      ASP.NET
      ASP.NET
      #Heroku
      #Seo

      I found Heroku to be a great option to get ExpressJS up and running with very little hustle. The free tier is great, but I'd recommend to set up a cronjob to visit your site every few minutes so that the server stays awake. Netlify was the option to host the front-end because doing the server side rendering on #Heroku would have taken a little more time than I'd like to. For the moment pre-rendering the app with prerender-spa-plugin is enough to help with #seo. Puppeteer was my choice over other options because it made it easier to scrape websites made on ASP.NET which is what I needed in this case. And Vue.js is my top choice at the moment because it's really beginner friendly and it has a lot of the features I like about Angular 2 and React. vuex is a must in most of the app I build.

      See more
      Django logo

      Django

      9.5K
      7.3K
      2.9K
      9.5K
      7.3K
      + 1
      2.9K
      The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
      Django logo
      Django
      VS
      Spring Batch logo
      Spring Batch

      related Django posts

      Dmitry Mukhin
      Dmitry Mukhin
      CTO at Uploadcare · | 22 upvotes · 450.5K views
      atUploadcareUploadcare
      Django
      Django
      Python
      Python
      React
      React
      Ember.js
      Ember.js
      Preact
      Preact
      PostCSS
      PostCSS

      Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

      Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

      For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

      However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

      All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

      See more
      Node.js
      Node.js
      JavaScript
      JavaScript
      Django
      Django
      Python
      Python

      Django or NodeJS? Hi, I’m thinking about which software I should use for my web-app. What about Node.js or Django for the back-end? I want to create an online preparation course for the final school exams in my country. At the beginning for maths. The course should contain tutorials and a lot of exercises of different types. E.g. multiple choice, user text/number input and drawing tasks. The exercises should change (different levels) with the learning progress. Wrong questions should asked again with different numbers. I also want a score system and statistics. So far, I have got only limited web development skills. (some HTML, CSS, Bootstrap and Wordpress). I don’t know JavaScript or Python.

      Possible pros for Python / Django: - easy syntax, easier to learn for me as a beginner - fast development, earlier release - libraries for mathematical and scientific computation

      Possible pros for JavaScript / Node.js: - great performance, better choice for real time applications: user should get the answer for a question quickly

      Which software would you use in my case? Are my arguments for Python/NodeJS right? Which kind of database would you use?

      Thank you for your answer!

      Node.js JavaScript Django Python

      See more
      Rails logo

      Rails

      9.4K
      6K
      5.3K
      9.4K
      6K
      + 1
      5.3K
      Web development that doesn't hurt
      Rails logo
      Rails
      VS
      Spring Batch logo
      Spring Batch

      related Rails posts

      Zach Holman
      Zach Holman
      at Zach Holman · | 34 upvotes · 313.4K views
      React
      React
      Apollo
      Apollo
      Rails
      Rails
      JavaScript
      JavaScript

      Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

      But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

      But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

      Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

      See more
      Russel Werner
      Russel Werner
      Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 21 upvotes · 505.3K views
      atStackShareStackShare
      React
      React
      Glamorous
      Glamorous
      Apollo
      Apollo
      Node.js
      Node.js
      Rails
      Rails
      Heroku
      Heroku
      GitHub
      GitHub
      Amazon S3
      Amazon S3
      Amazon CloudFront
      Amazon CloudFront
      Webpack
      Webpack
      CircleCI
      CircleCI
      Redis
      Redis
      #StackDecisionsLaunch
      #SSR
      #Microservices
      #FrontEndRepoSplit

      StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

      Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

      #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

      See more

      related Laravel posts

      Antonio Sanchez
      Antonio Sanchez
      CEO at Kokoen GmbH · | 13 upvotes · 211.6K views
      atKokoen GmbHKokoen GmbH
      PHP
      PHP
      Laravel
      Laravel
      MySQL
      MySQL
      Go
      Go
      MongoDB
      MongoDB
      JavaScript
      JavaScript
      Node.js
      Node.js
      ExpressJS
      ExpressJS

      Back at the start of 2017, we decided to create a web-based tool for the SEO OnPage analysis of our clients' websites. We had over 2.000 websites to analyze, so we had to perform thousands of requests to get every single page from those websites, process the information and save the big amounts of data somewhere.

      Very soon we realized that the initial chosen script language and database, PHP, Laravel and MySQL, was not going to be able to cope efficiently with such a task.

      By that time, we were doing some experiments for other projects with a language we had recently get to know, Go , so we decided to get a try and code the crawler using it. It was fantastic, we could process much more data with way less CPU power and in less time. By using the concurrency abilites that the language has to offers, we could also do more Http requests in less time.

      Unfortunately, I have no comparison numbers to show about the performance differences between Go and PHP since the difference was so clear from the beginning and that we didn't feel the need to do further comparison tests nor document it. We just switched fully to Go.

      There was still a problem: despite the big amount of Data we were generating, MySQL was performing very well, but as we were adding more and more features to the software and with those features more and more different type of data to save, it was a nightmare for the database architects to structure everything correctly on the database, so it was clear what we had to do next: switch to a NoSQL database. So we switched to MongoDB, and it was also fantastic: we were expending almost zero time in thinking how to structure the Database and the performance also seemed to be better, but again, I have no comparison numbers to show due to the lack of time.

      We also decided to switch the website from PHP and Laravel to JavaScript and Node.js and ExpressJS since working with the JSON Data that we were saving now in the Database would be easier.

      As of now, we don't only use the tool intern but we also opened it for everyone to use for free: https://tool-seo.com

      See more
      Epistol
      Epistol
      Laravel
      Laravel
      PhpStorm
      PhpStorm
      Google Analytics
      Google Analytics
      Sass
      Sass
      HTML5
      HTML5
      JavaScript
      JavaScript
      Vue.js
      Vue.js
      Webpack
      Webpack
      Buddy
      Buddy
      nginx
      nginx
      Ubuntu
      Ubuntu
      GitHub
      GitHub
      Git
      Git
      Deployer
      Deployer
      CloudFlare
      CloudFlare
      Let's Encrypt
      Let's Encrypt
      Stripe
      Stripe
      Asana
      Asana
      Bulma
      Bulma
      PHP
      PHP
      #CDG
      CDG

      I use Laravel because it's the most advances PHP framework out there, easy to maintain, easy to upgrade and most of all : easy to get a handle on, and to follow every new technology ! PhpStorm is our main software to code, as of simplicity and full range of tools for a modern application.

      Google Analytics Analytics of course for a tailored analytics, Bulma as an innovative CSS framework, coupled with our Sass (Scss) pre-processor.

      As of more basic stuff, we use HTML5, JavaScript (but with Vue.js too) and Webpack to handle the generation of all this.

      To deploy, we set up Buddy to easily send the updates on our nginx / Ubuntu server, where it will connect to our GitHub Git private repository, pull and do all the operations needed with Deployer .

      CloudFlare ensure the rapidity of distribution of our content, and Let's Encrypt the https certificate that is more than necessary when we'll want to sell some products with our Stripe api calls.

      Asana is here to let us list all the functionalities, possibilities and ideas we want to implement.

      See more
      Android SDK logo

      Android SDK

      8.4K
      6.3K
      774
      8.4K
      6.3K
      + 1
      774
      An SDK that provides you the API libraries and developer tools necessary to build, test, and debug apps...
      Android SDK logo
      Android SDK
      VS
      Spring Batch logo
      Spring Batch

      related Android SDK posts

      Jesus Dario Rivera Rubio
      Jesus Dario Rivera Rubio
      Telecomm Engineering at Netbeast · | 10 upvotes · 312.4K views
      atNetbeastNetbeast
      React Native
      React Native
      Android SDK
      Android SDK
      Objective-C
      Objective-C
      Travis CI
      Travis CI
      Bitrise
      Bitrise
      GitHub
      GitHub
      Firebase
      Firebase
      Amplitude
      Amplitude
      Intercom
      Intercom
      Mailjet
      Mailjet
      #SmartHome
      #End2end

      We are using React Native in #SmartHome to share the business logic between Android and iOS team and approach users with a unique brand experience. The drawback is that we require lots of native Android SDK and Objective-C modules, so a good part of the invested time is there. The gain for a app that relies less on native communication, sensors and OS tools should be even higher.

      Also it helps us set different testing stages: we use Travis CI for the javascript (business logic), Bitrise to run build tests and @Detox for #end2end automated user tests.

      We use a microservices structure on top of Zeit's @now that read from firebase. We use JWT auth to authenticate requests among services and from users, following GitHub philosophy of using the same infrastructure than its API consumers. Firebase is used mainly as a key-value store between services and as a backup database for users. We also use its authentication mechanisms.

      You can be super locked-in if you also rely on it's analytics, but we use Amplitude for that, which offers us great insights. Intercom for communications with end-user and Mailjet for marketing.

      See more
      Sezgi Ulucam
      Sezgi Ulucam
      Developer Advocate at Hasura · | 7 upvotes · 208.7K views
      Expo
      Expo
      Xcode
      Xcode
      React Native
      React Native
      Android Studio
      Android Studio
      Android SDK
      Android SDK

      I've recently switched to using Expo for initializing and developing my React Native apps. Compared to React Native CLI, it's so much easier to get set up and going. Setting up and maintaining Android Studio, Android SDK, and virtual devices used to be such a headache. Thanks to Expo, I can now test my apps directly on my Android phone, just by installing the Expo app. I still use Xcode Simulator for iOS testing, since I don't have an iPhone, but that's easy anyway. The big win for me with Expo is ease of Android testing.

      The Expo SDK also provides convenient features like Facebook login, MapView, push notifications, and many others. https://docs.expo.io/versions/v31.0.0/sdk/

      See more