StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Issue Tracking
  5. Airtable vs Jira

Airtable vs Jira

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jira
Jira
Stacks62.5K
Followers49.5K
Votes1.2K
Airtable
Airtable
Stacks1.0K
Followers890
Votes40

Airtable vs Jira: What are the differences?

Introduction

Both Airtable and Jira are popular project management tools that offer unique features to help teams collaborate and organize their work. However, there are key differences between the two platforms that set them apart from each other.

  1. Data Structure: One of the main differences between Airtable and Jira lies in their data structure. Airtable is a flexible and customizable tool that allows users to create databases and organize their information in a grid-like format. On the other hand, Jira follows a more structured approach, using a predefined set of fields and workflows to manage projects and tasks.

  2. Collaboration Features: Airtable stands out in terms of its collaboration features. It offers real-time collaboration, allowing multiple team members to work on a project simultaneously and see changes in real-time. Jira, although it offers collaboration features, focuses more on task tracking and issue management rather than real-time collaboration.

  3. Workflow Automation: Jira offers powerful workflow automation capabilities, allowing teams to automate their processes and streamline project management. It provides a wide range of automation rules and triggers to automate repetitive tasks and ensure efficient workflows. In contrast, Airtable does not offer extensive workflow automation features, making it more suitable for simpler projects or teams who prefer a more hands-on approach.

  4. Customization Options: Airtable excels in customization options, allowing users to create their own fields, formulas, and views to tailor the tool to their specific needs. It offers a wide range of field types and customization options that give users more control and flexibility. On the other hand, Jira provides a more limited set of customization options, which may be sufficient for some teams but could be a limitation for those who require extensive customization.

  5. Integration Capabilities: Jira offers robust integration capabilities, allowing teams to connect it with other popular tools such as Slack, GitHub, and Confluence. This enables seamless collaboration and data synchronization between different platforms. While Airtable also offers integration options, it may not have the same level of integration possibilities as Jira, especially when it comes to specific development and project management tools.

  6. User Interface: The user interface of Airtable and Jira also differs significantly. Airtable has a more visually appealing and user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate, create, and manage databases. In contrast, Jira has a more technical and complex interface, which may require some learning curve for new users. However, this complexity allows Jira to offer more in-depth project management features and functionalities.

In Summary, Airtable and Jira differ in their data structure, collaboration features, workflow automation capabilities, customization options, integration capabilities, and user interface. These differences make each platform more suitable for specific project management needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jira, Airtable

DetStartups
DetStartups

Nov 11, 2019

Needs advice

I'm trying to set up an ideally "no- code" way to have a backend of 3 different tables and be able to find a value in table #3 (contains businesses & cities) by first finding a record in table #1 (7,000+ zip codes) that corresponds to a city (table #2 has the unique cities), and then finding which businesses are located in these cities ( in this specific, original zipcode lookup). And return the business and a description via an API to a front-end results page, which happens to be a WordPress page - but doesn't need to be. I've tried Airtable's API, AirPress (a finicky WordPress plugin for Airtable's API), and I've looked at Sheetsu and a similar spreadsheet as backend and a simple API. I run into the issue where they work fine when you just need to query 1 table, but when you need to use the result from that query in another query to a different table. I'm back in SQL land - where sure it could be done with SQLite - needing to probably create an intersection table or a JOIN and build an API off of that. Is there a way to accomplish what I want without going back to SQL queries and some API?

59.9k views59.9k
Comments
Jakub
Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Mar 6, 2020

DecidedonYouTrackYouTrackJiraJiraJetBrains SpaceJetBrains Space

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

329k views329k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira
Jira
Airtable
Airtable

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

Working with Airtable is as fast and easy as editing a spreadsheet. But only Airtable is backed by the power of a full database, giving you rich features far beyond what a spreadsheet can offer.

Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use
Attachments;Link Tables;Fully mobile;Instant collaboration;Easily undo mistakes
Statistics
Stacks
62.5K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
49.5K
Followers
890
Votes
1.2K
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 310
    Powerful
  • 254
    Flexible
  • 149
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
Cons
  • 8
    Rather expensive
  • 5
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow
  • 1
    Cloud or Datacenter only
Pros
  • 19
    Powerful and easy to use
  • 8
    Robust and dynamic
  • 6
    Quick UI Layer
  • 4
    Practical built in views
  • 3
    Robust API documentation
Integrations
Acunote
Acunote
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
SnapEngage
SnapEngage
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Zendesk
Zendesk
Zopim
Zopim
UserVoice
UserVoice
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Jira, Airtable?

Bugify

Bugify

Bugify offers a simple way of managing issues for your projects.

Sheetsu

Sheetsu

Use spreadsheet as your database. Give data to your users the nice way, directly from the tool you know. Without bothering webdeveloper.

ZenTao

ZenTao

You can effortlessly stay on top of your product development, create and delegate tasks, test your software, customize, store and secure your documents and more.

Bugzilla

Bugzilla

Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

VersionOne

VersionOne

It is a formidable Agile management solution that is both comprehensive and versatile and developed for teams and projects of various scope and size. It is a compact platform that delivers outstanding performance in terms of managing and tracking multiple teams, tasks, and projects.

Sheety

Sheety

Power websites, apps, or whatever you like, all from a spreadsheet. Changes to your spreadsheet update your API in realtime.

Mantis

Mantis

It is a free web-based bug tracking system. It provides a delicate balance between simplicity and power. Users are able to get started in minutes and start managing their projects while collaborating with their teammates and clients effectively.

YouTrack

YouTrack

A project management tool that can be adapted to your processes to help you deliver great products. Track tasks and bugs, plan sprints and releases, create workflows, and customize for your business processes.

Sheetlabs

Sheetlabs

Drag & drop your data, name your API and choose what data people can see - that's it. Documentation is created automatically.

sheet2api

sheet2api

Use any Google Sheets or Excel Online spreadsheet to power a fully-fledged API, no coding required.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope