Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon CloudFront vs Amazon S3: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In this markdown, we will discuss the key differences between Amazon CloudFront and Amazon S3.
Data Storage and Content Delivery: Amazon S3 is a cloud-based object storage service that allows users to store and retrieve large amounts of data from anywhere on the web. On the other hand, Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to end-users with low latency and high transfer speeds.
Data Scope: Amazon S3 is primarily used for storage and retrieval of data objects. It offers simple storage and standard retrieval as its default storage class. On the contrary, Amazon CloudFront focuses on content delivery, caching, and accelerating the distribution of content worldwide.
Edge Locations: Amazon CloudFront leverages a global network of edge locations spread across different geographical regions. These edge locations act as caching endpoints, reducing latency and improving content delivery. Conversely, Amazon S3 does not have edge locations as it is mainly used for object storage and retrieval from specific data centers.
Cache Behavior: Amazon CloudFront automatically caches content at edge locations, which means subsequent requests for the same content can be served directly from the edge location without having to fetch it from the origin server. In contrast, Amazon S3 does not have built-in caching capabilities. When using Amazon S3, content needs to be retrieved from the origin server each time, without the automatic caching provided by CloudFront.
Content Distribution Network: Amazon CloudFront acts as a global content distribution network (CDN), enabling faster and more efficient delivery of content to end-users across the globe. This is achieved by caching content at edge locations, reducing the round trip time for data requests. Amazon S3, on the other hand, does not offer the same level of content distribution and acceleration as it lacks the caching infrastructure of CloudFront.
Pricing Model: The pricing model for Amazon S3 is primarily based on the amount of data stored and the number of requests made to access that data. In contrast, Amazon CloudFront pricing is based on data transfer out and the number of requests made to access content via the CDN. Therefore, CloudFront usage can incur additional charges for content delivery and caching services compared to S3.
In summary, Amazon S3 is a cloud-based object storage service primarily used for storing and retrieving data objects, while Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network that focuses on caching and accelerating the global distribution of content, providing faster and more efficient content delivery to end-users.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
At Joyn we use AWS infrastructures extensively, so we need a wide range of different tools starting from file storage until the health monitoring of our running services. For Smart TV stack we use S3 to mostly store static files (like scripts, styles and html), CloudFront to keep good response times using the cache, Lambda to recognize the TV platform and serve appropriate bundle (except Samsung Tizen platform where application is packaged), CloudWatch to receive alerts in case we have any issues inside of our lambda function.
Pros of Amazon CloudFront
- Fast245
- Cdn166
- Compatible with other aws services157
- Simple125
- Global108
- Cheap41
- Cost-effective36
- Reliable27
- One stop solution19
- Elastic9
- Object store1
- HTTP/2 Support1
Pros of Amazon S3
- Reliable590
- Scalable492
- Cheap456
- Simple & easy329
- Many sdks83
- Logical30
- Easy Setup13
- REST API11
- 1000+ POPs11
- Secure6
- Easy4
- Plug and play4
- Web UI for uploading files3
- Faster on response2
- Flexible2
- GDPR ready2
- Easy to use1
- Plug-gable1
- Easy integration with CloudFront1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon CloudFront
- UI could use some work3
- Invalidations take so long1
Cons of Amazon S3
- Permissions take some time to get right7
- Requires a credit card6
- Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly6
- Complex to set up3