Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon RDS vs Amazon S3: What are the differences?
Amazon RDS (Relational Database Service) and Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) are two popular services offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). Let's explore the key differences between them.
Database vs. Storage: Amazon RDS is primarily a managed relational database service that allows users to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides fully-managed database instances for MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, and Amazon Aurora. On the other hand, Amazon S3 is a scalable object storage service designed for storing and retrieving large amounts of unstructured data, such as images, videos, documents, backups, logs, etc.
Data Structure: Amazon RDS deals with structured data and follows a fixed schema defined by the chosen database engine. It provides features like ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties, data indexing, transactions, and SQL querying. In contrast, Amazon S3 does not impose any schema and allows storing any type of object in its buckets, making it versatile for storing files, objects, and media content of any format.
Storage Management: Amazon RDS automatically manages database storage allocation, performance optimization, backups, and software patching. It provides features like automated backups, replication, and point-in-time recovery for data protection. On the other hand, Amazon S3 provides simple storage management, enabling users to create, delete, and organize buckets. It also offers various storage classes for cost optimization, data lifecycle policies, and server-side encryption for data security.
Performance and Scalability: Amazon RDS allows users to choose the database instance type and provides options for read replicas and multi-AZ deployments to enhance performance and availability. It also supports auto-scaling based on workload demands. In contrast, Amazon S3 is designed for high-scalability, providing consistent performance and virtually unlimited storage capacity with automatic scaling. It is ideal for applications that require storing and retrieving large volumes of data with high throughput.
Data Access and Integration: Amazon RDS allows direct access to the relational databases using standard database connectivity protocols like JDBC, ODBC, and network connectivity. It supports integrations with other AWS services like AWS Lambda, AWS Glue, and AWS Data Pipeline. On the other hand, Amazon S3 provides a RESTful API and SDKs for easy data access from applications. It integrates well with other AWS services like AWS Lambda, Amazon EMR, Amazon Athena, and Amazon Redshift for data processing and analytics.
Cost Structure: Amazon RDS pricing is based on the database instance type, allocated storage, provisioned IOPS, backups, and data transfer. It offers multiple pricing options similar to EC2 instances. On the contrary, Amazon S3 pricing is based on the amount of storage used, data transfer, and requests made. It offers different storage tiers with varying costs based on data access patterns and availability requirements.
In summary, Amazon RDS is a managed relational database service for structured data, while Amazon S3 is an object storage service for storing unstructured data. RDS focuses on database management, performance, and structured querying, whereas S3 provides simple storage management, scalability, and versatility for storing large volumes of objects.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
Pros of Amazon RDS
- Reliable failovers165
- Automated backups156
- Backed by amazon130
- Db snapshots92
- Multi-availability87
- Control iops, fast restore to point of time30
- Security28
- Elastic24
- Push-button scaling20
- Automatic software patching20
- Replication4
- Reliable3
- Isolation2
Pros of Amazon S3
- Reliable590
- Scalable492
- Cheap456
- Simple & easy329
- Many sdks83
- Logical30
- Easy Setup13
- REST API11
- 1000+ POPs11
- Secure6
- Easy4
- Plug and play4
- Web UI for uploading files3
- Faster on response2
- Flexible2
- GDPR ready2
- Easy to use1
- Plug-gable1
- Easy integration with CloudFront1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon RDS
Cons of Amazon S3
- Permissions take some time to get right7
- Requires a credit card6
- Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly6
- Complex to set up3