Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon Route 53

14.3K
9.2K
+ 1
678
CloudFlare

76K
22.1K
+ 1
1.8K
Add tool

Amazon Route 53 vs CloudFlare: What are the differences?

Amazon Route 53 and CloudFlare are both widely used services in the field of DNS management and domain registration. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Pricing and Billing Models: Amazon Route 53 offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the actual usage of the service. On the other hand, CloudFlare offers tiered pricing plans with different levels of features and performance, allowing you to choose the plan that suits your specific needs.

  2. DNS Resolution Performance: Amazon Route 53 claims to have a large global infrastructure, with multiple servers distributed across the world, resulting in low latency and fast response times. CloudFlare, on the other hand, utilizes its vast network of data centers to provide fast DNS resolution, leveraging its CDN capabilities to improve performance.

  3. Integration with Other Services: Amazon Route 53 is deeply integrated with the AWS ecosystem, allowing seamless integration with other Amazon Web Services such as EC2, S3, and CloudFront. CloudFlare, on the other hand, offers integration with various popular platforms and services, making it easier to manage DNS records and settings.

  4. Security and DDoS Protection: Security is a crucial aspect of any DNS management service, and both Amazon Route 53 and CloudFlare offer robust security features. Amazon Route 53 provides DNSSEC (Domain Name System Security Extensions) support, which helps ensure the authenticity and integrity of DNS data. Additionally, Amazon Route 53 offers protection against distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks. CloudFlare, on the other hand, is renowned for its strong DDoS protection capabilities and offers additional security features like Web Application Firewall (WAF) and SSL/TLS encryption.

  5. Interface and User Experience: The user interface and overall user experience can greatly impact the ease of use and efficiency of a DNS management service. Amazon Route 53 provides a comprehensive web console with a multitude of configuration options, suitable for advanced users. CloudFlare, on the other hand, offers a user-friendly interface with a simplified setup process, making it more accessible to beginners.

  6. Managed DNS Features: When it comes to managed DNS features, Amazon Route 53 offers a wide range of options, including Alias records, health checks, and geo-routing. CloudFlare, on the other hand, provides features like Traffic Manager, which allows users to control traffic based on rules and settings.

In summary, Amazon Route 53 and CloudFlare have key differences in their pricing and billing models, DNS resolution performance, integration with other services, security and DDoS protection capabilities, user interface and experience, as well as the range of managed DNS features they offer. These differences make each service unique and suitable for different use cases and requirements.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Amazon Route 53
Pros of CloudFlare
  • 185
    High-availability
  • 148
    Simple
  • 103
    Backed by amazon
  • 76
    Fast
  • 54
    Auhtoritive dns servers are spread over different tlds
  • 29
    One stop solution for all our cloud needs
  • 26
    Easy setup and monitoring
  • 20
    Low-latency
  • 17
    Flexible
  • 15
    Secure
  • 3
    API available
  • 1
    Dynamically setup new clients
  • 1
    Easily add client DNS entries.
  • 424
    Easy setup, great cdn
  • 277
    Free ssl
  • 199
    Easy setup
  • 190
    Security
  • 180
    Ssl
  • 98
    Great cdn
  • 77
    Optimizer
  • 71
    Simple
  • 44
    Great UI
  • 28
    Great js cdn
  • 12
    Apps
  • 12
    HTTP/2 Support
  • 12
    DNS Analytics
  • 12
    AutoMinify
  • 9
    Rocket Loader
  • 9
    Ipv6
  • 9
    Easy
  • 8
    IPv6 "One Click"
  • 8
    Fantastic CDN service
  • 7
    DNSSEC
  • 7
    Nice DNS
  • 7
    SSHFP
  • 7
    Free GeoIP
  • 7
    Amazing performance
  • 7
    API
  • 7
    Cheapest SSL
  • 6
    SPDY
  • 6
    Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
  • 5
    Ubuntu
  • 5
    Asynchronous resource loading
  • 4
    Global Load Balancing
  • 4
    Performance
  • 4
    Easy Use
  • 3
    CDN
  • 2
    Registrar
  • 2
    Support for SSHFP records
  • 1
    Web3
  • 1
    Прохси
  • 1
    HTTPS3/Quic

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon Route 53
Cons of CloudFlare
  • 2
    SLOW
  • 2
    Geo-based routing only works with AWS zones
  • 1
    Restrictive rate limit
  • 2
    No support for SSHFP records
  • 2
    Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Amazon Route 53?

Amazon Route 53 is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating human readable names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Route 53 effectively connects user requests to infrastructure running in Amazon Web Services (AWS) – such as an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance, an Amazon Elastic Load Balancer, or an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket – and can also be used to route users to infrastructure outside of AWS.

What is CloudFlare?

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Amazon Route 53?
What companies use CloudFlare?
See which teams inside your own company are using Amazon Route 53 or CloudFlare.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Amazon Route 53?
What tools integrate with CloudFlare?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitHubPythonReact+42
49
40781
GitHubSlackNGINX+15
28
20980
GitGitHubSlack+30
27
18406
JavaScriptGitGitHub+33
20
2091
Jun 19 2015 at 6:37AM

ReadMe.io

JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+25
12
2378
What are some alternatives to Amazon Route 53 and CloudFlare?
GoDaddy
Go Daddy makes registering Domain Names fast, simple, and affordable. It is a trusted domain registrar that empowers people with creative ideas to succeed online.
Google Cloud DNS
Use Google's infrastructure for production quality, high volume DNS serving. Your users will have reliable, low-latency access to Google's infrastructure from anywhere in the world using our network of Anycast name servers.
Google Domains
It is a domain registration service which includes top website builders. The privacy is included at no additional cost. It also includes simple domain management tools.
Namecheap
We provide a set of DNS servers spread across the US and Europe to deliver highly reliable DNS services to everyone. By choosing Namecheap.com as your domain registrar, you are choosing a highly reputable and reliable partner. Namecheap.com is rated 4.6 out of 5 - Based on 1,395 reviews via Google Checkout
Amazon S3
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
See all alternatives