StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. AWS OpsWorks vs Ansible

AWS OpsWorks vs Ansible

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS OpsWorks
AWS OpsWorks
Stacks196
Followers222
Votes51
Ansible
Ansible
Stacks19.5K
Followers15.6K
Votes1.3K
GitHub Stars66.9K
Forks24.1K

AWS OpsWorks vs Ansible: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS OpsWorks and Ansible

1. Platform Compatibility:

AWS OpsWorks is a fully managed service that operates in the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem. It offers seamless integration and compatibility with other AWS services such as EC2, RDS, and Elastic Load Balancer. On the other hand, Ansible is an open-source automation tool that can be used across multiple platforms including cloud providers like AWS as well as on-premises environments. This makes Ansible more flexible and adaptable for diverse infrastructure setups.

2. Infrastructure Provisioning and Configuration:

OpsWorks provides a higher level of abstraction by offering built-in management functionality for the entire infrastructure stack. With OpsWorks, users can define the specifications of their applications and OpsWorks handles the provisioning and configuration of the underlying infrastructure automatically. In contrast, Ansible is focused on configuration management. It allows users to define and automate the desired state of their infrastructure, but it does not provide native provisioning capabilities. Users need to rely on other tools or manual methods for provisioning the infrastructure.

3. Learning Curve and Ease of Use:

OpsWorks offers a user-friendly interface and graphical console that simplifies the setup and management of applications and infrastructure. It provides predefined deployment stacks and layers, making it easier for users to get started. Ansible, however, has a steeper learning curve as it requires users to learn its domain-specific language (DSL) and YAML syntax for writing playbooks. While Ansible allows for more fine-grained control and customization, it might require more effort and expertise to set up and operate effectively.

4. Scalability and Auto Scaling:

OpsWorks comes with built-in support for auto scaling, allowing users to automatically adjust the number of instances in response to changes in demand. It integrates with AWS Auto Scaling and offers predefined scaling policies. This makes it easy to scale applications in the AWS environment. Ansible, on the other hand, does not provide native auto scaling capabilities. Users need to manually configure and manage auto scaling solutions themselves, which might require additional tools and expertise.

5. Integration with Third-Party Tools:

OpsWorks provides seamless integration with other AWS services like CloudWatch for monitoring, Elastic Load Balancer for load balancing, and RDS for database management. It also supports integration with custom Chef recipes and cookbooks. Ansible, being an open-source tool, can integrate with a wide range of third-party tools and services through its extensive library of modules. It can be easily integrated with tools like Jenkins for continuous integration and delivery, and various monitoring and logging systems.

6. Licensing and Cost:

OpsWorks is a managed service provided by AWS and is billed based on the resources used, such as the number of instances and load balancers. It is a pay-as-you-go model, so the cost scales with the size of the infrastructure. Ansible, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and is free to use. There are no licensing costs associated with Ansible, although users might incur costs for hosting and managing their infrastructure.

In Summary, AWS OpsWorks is an AWS-native managed service that offers platform compatibility, built-in infrastructure provisioning, scalability features, and easy integration with other AWS services. Ansible, on the other hand, is an open-source automation tool with a wider platform compatibility, a focus on configuration management, extensive integration capabilities, and lower cost due to its open-source nature.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS OpsWorks, Ansible

Rogério
Rogério

Software Developer

Aug 10, 2021

Needs adviceonDockerDockerGitGitLinuxLinux

Personal Dotfiles management

Given that they are all “configuration management” tools - meaning they are designed to deploy, configure and manage servers - what would be the simplest - and yet robust - solution to manage personal dotfiles - for n00bs.

Ideally, I reckon, it should:

  • be containerized (@{Docker}|tool:586|?)
  • be versionable (@{Git}|tool:1046|)
  • ensure idempotency
  • allow full automation (tests, CI/CD, etc.)
  • be fully recoverable (@{Linux}|tool:10483|/ @{macOS}|tool:5560|)
  • be easier to setup/manage (as much as possible)

Does it make sense?

282k views282k
Comments
Hendrik
Hendrik

CEO at Forward H

Dec 13, 2021

Decided

Terraform provides a cloud-provider agnostic way of provisioning cloud infrastructure while AWS CloudFormation is limited to AWS.

Pulumi is a great tool that provides similar features as Terraform, including advanced features like policy and cost management.

We see that Terraform has great support in the cloud community. For most cloud services we use, there is an official Terraform provider. We also believe in the declarative model of HCL, which is why we chose Terraform over Pulumi. However, we still keep an eye on Pulumi's progress.

Ansible is great for provisioning software and configuration within virtual machines, but we don't think that Ansible is the right tool for provisioning cloud infrastructure since it's built around the assumption that there is an inventory of remote machines. Terraform also supports more services that we use than Ansible.

22.2k views22.2k
Comments
ajit
ajit

Jan 12, 2022

Needs adviceonRundeckRundeckAnsibleAnsibleJenkinsJenkins

We have a lot of operations running using Rundeck (including deployments) and we also have various roles created in Ansible for infrastructure creation, which we execute using Rundeck. Rundeck we are using a community edition. Since we are already using Rundeck for executing the Ansible role, need an advice. What difference will it make if we replace Rundeck with Ansible Tower? Advantages and Disadvantages? We are using Jenkins to call Rundeck Job, same will be used for Ansible Tower if we replace Rundeck.

110k views110k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS OpsWorks
AWS OpsWorks
Ansible
Ansible

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

AWS OpsWorks lets you model the different components of your application as layers in a stack, and maps your logical architecture to a physical architecture. You can see all resources associated with your application, and their status, in one place.;AWS OpsWorks provides an event-driven configuration system with rich deployment tools that allow you to efficiently manage your applications over their lifetime, including support for customizable deployments, rollback, partial deployments, patch management, automatic instance scaling, and auto healing.;AWS OpsWorks lets you define template configurations for your entire environment in a format that you can maintain and version just like your application source code.;AWS OpsWorks supports any software that has a scripted installation. Because OpsWorks uses the Chef framework, you can bring your own recipes or leverage hundreds of community-built configurations.
Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.;Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.;Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
66.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
24.1K
Stacks
196
Stacks
19.5K
Followers
222
Followers
15.6K
Votes
51
Votes
1.3K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 32
    Devops
  • 19
    Cloud management
Pros
  • 284
    Agentless
  • 210
    Great configuration
  • 199
    Simple
  • 176
    Powerful
  • 155
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 8
    Dangerous
  • 5
    Hard to install
  • 3
    Backward compatibility
  • 3
    Bloated
  • 3
    Doesn't Run on Windows
Integrations
No integrations available
Nexmo
Nexmo
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Docker
Docker
OpenStack
OpenStack
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
New Relic
New Relic
PagerDuty
PagerDuty

What are some alternatives to AWS OpsWorks, Ansible?

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Mina

Mina

Mina works really fast because it's a deploy Bash script generator. It generates an entire procedure as a Bash script and runs it remotely in the server. Compare this to the likes of Vlad or Capistrano, where each command is run separately on their own SSH sessions. Mina only creates one SSH session per deploy, minimizing the SSH connection overhead.

Puppet Bolt

Puppet Bolt

It is an open source orchestration tool that automates the manual work it takes to maintain your infrastructure. Use it to automate tasks that you perform on an as-needed basis or as part of a greater orchestration workflow.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana