Ansible vs AWX vs ScriptRock

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ansible

18.8K
15.3K
+ 1
1.3K
AWX

137
253
+ 1
1
ScriptRock

0
3
+ 1
0

AWX vs Ansible vs ScriptRock: What are the differences?

Introduction: When it comes to automation in IT environments, tools like AWX, Ansible, and ScriptRock play important roles. Understanding the key differences between these tools is crucial for making informed decisions.

  1. Architecture: AWX is the open-source upstream project for Ansible Tower, providing a web-based user interface, REST API, and task engine built on top of Ansible. Ansible is an automation tool that automates software provisioning, configuration management, and application deployment. ScriptRock, on the other hand, is a cloud-based configuration monitoring and testing tool focused on verifying server and network configurations against policy and best practices.

  2. Scalability and Enterprise Features: Ansible Tower, the commercial product based on AWX, provides additional enterprise features such as role-based access control, job scheduling, and workflow orchestration for large-scale environments. AWX lacks some of these enterprise-grade capabilities but still offers a robust automation platform. ScriptRock, while focused on configuration monitoring, may not have the same scalability and advanced enterprise features as Ansible Tower.

  3. Community Support: AWX benefits from the active community surrounding Ansible, providing a wealth of resources, playbooks, and integrations contributed by users worldwide. Ansible, as a separate entity, also enjoys strong community support and frequent updates. ScriptRock, being a distinct tool with a more targeted focus, may have a smaller community compared to the Ansible ecosystem.

  4. Cost and Licensing: AWX is free and open-source, appealing to users who prefer self-hosted solutions without licensing costs. Ansible Tower, with its additional features and support, comes with a commercial license that may be more suitable for enterprise users requiring formal support and advanced functionalities. ScriptRock typically operates on a subscription-based model, offering various tiers based on features and usage.

  5. Integration Capabilities: Both AWX and Ansible have strong integration capabilities with various tools, cloud platforms, and technologies, making them versatile choices for automation tasks. ScriptRock, while offering integration options, may not have the same breadth of integrations as the Ansible ecosystem due to its narrower focus on configuration monitoring.

  6. User Interface and Ease of Use: AWX and Ansible Tower come with user-friendly web interfaces that simplify the management and monitoring of automation tasks. ScriptRock, geared towards configuration validation and compliance, may prioritize detailed reporting and policy enforcement over intuitive interfaces for general automation tasks.

In Summary, understanding the differences in architecture, scalability, community support, cost, integration capabilities, and user experience is essential when comparing AWX, Ansible, and ScriptRock for automation needs.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Ansible
Pros of AWX
Pros of ScriptRock
  • 284
    Agentless
  • 210
    Great configuration
  • 199
    Simple
  • 176
    Powerful
  • 155
    Easy to learn
  • 69
    Flexible
  • 55
    Doesn't get in the way of getting s--- done
  • 35
    Makes sense
  • 30
    Super efficient and flexible
  • 27
    Powerful
  • 11
    Dynamic Inventory
  • 9
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 7
    Works with AWS
  • 6
    Cloud Oriented
  • 6
    Easy to maintain
  • 4
    Vagrant provisioner
  • 4
    Simple and powerful
  • 4
    Multi language
  • 4
    Simple
  • 4
    Because SSH
  • 4
    Procedural or declarative, or both
  • 4
    Easy
  • 3
    Consistency
  • 2
    Well-documented
  • 2
    Masterless
  • 2
    Debugging is simple
  • 2
    Merge hash to get final configuration similar to hiera
  • 2
    Fast as hell
  • 1
    Manage any OS
  • 1
    Work on windows, but difficult to manage
  • 1
    Certified Content
  • 1
    Open source
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Ansible
    Cons of AWX
    Cons of ScriptRock
    • 8
      Dangerous
    • 5
      Hard to install
    • 3
      Doesn't Run on Windows
    • 3
      Bloated
    • 3
      Backward compatibility
    • 2
      No immutable infrastructure
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con

        Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

        - No public GitHub repository available -

        What is Ansible?

        Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

        What is AWX?

        AWX provides a web-based user interface, REST API, and task engine built on top of Ansible. It is the upstream project for Tower, a commercial derivative of AWX. Ansible Towers powers enterprise automation by adding control, security and delegation capabilities to Ansible environments.

        What is ScriptRock?

        ScriptRock helps you scan, compare and control configurations and changes in the datacenter or the cloud.

        Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

        What companies use Ansible?
        What companies use AWX?
        What companies use ScriptRock?
          No companies found

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with Ansible?
          What tools integrate with AWX?
          What tools integrate with ScriptRock?

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          Blog Posts

          PythonDockerKubernetes+14
          12
          2608
          GitHubGitSlack+30
          27
          18360
          JavaScriptGitHubGit+33
          20
          2087
          GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
          12
          6569
          JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
          53
          21896
          What are some alternatives to Ansible, AWX, and ScriptRock?
          Puppet Labs
          Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.
          Chef
          Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.
          Salt
          Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.
          Terraform
          With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.
          Jenkins
          In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
          See all alternatives