StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. Ansible vs Concourse

Ansible vs Concourse

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ansible
Ansible
Stacks19.5K
Followers15.6K
Votes1.3K
GitHub Stars66.9K
Forks24.1K
Concourse
Concourse
Stacks254
Followers393
Votes54
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks870

Ansible vs Concourse: What are the differences?

<Ansible and Concourse are both popular automation tools used in the DevOps process. Ansible is an open-source automation platform that simplifies IT orchestration tasks, while Concourse is a continuous integration and continuous deployment tool that focuses on automation and monitoring of application delivery pipelines.>

  1. Architecture: Ansible follows a push configuration model where the control node pushes configurations to the managed nodes, while Concourse follows a pull-based model where agents on worker nodes pull task definitions from the Concourse server.

  2. Purpose: Ansible is primarily used for configuration management and task automation, making it suitable for managing infrastructure and deploying applications, whereas Concourse is designed specifically for continuous integration and continuous deployment pipelines that automate the build, test, and deployment processes.

  3. Language: Ansible uses YAML for writing playbooks, which are human-readable files defining tasks to be executed on managed nodes, while Concourse uses a domain-specific language called Concourse Pipeline Configurations for defining pipelines, making it more tailored for CI/CD workflows.

  4. Extensibility: Ansible provides a wide range of modules and plugins to extend its functionality and integrate with various tools and platforms, enabling users to customize their automation workflows, whereas Concourse focuses on its pipeline structure, limiting flexibility in customization outside of the defined pipeline constructs.

  5. Community Support: Ansible has a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, modules, and support resources that cater to a broad user base, while Concourse, although with a smaller community, provides focused support and resources for users looking specifically for CI/CD automation solutions.

  6. Ease of Use: Ansible's agentless nature simplifies setup and configuration, requiring minimal dependencies on managed nodes, making it easy to get started with automation tasks quickly, compared to Concourse that requires setting up and managing Concourse workers and pipelines, which can be more complex for beginners.

In Summary, Ansible is a versatile tool suitable for various automation tasks and configuration management, whereas Concourse is specialized in CI/CD pipeline automation tailored for software development workflows.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ansible, Concourse

Anonymous
Anonymous

Sep 17, 2019

Needs advice

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

329k views329k
Comments
veera
veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ansible
Ansible
Concourse
Concourse

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.

Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.;Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.;Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
66.9K
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
24.1K
GitHub Forks
870
Stacks
19.5K
Stacks
254
Followers
15.6K
Followers
393
Votes
1.3K
Votes
54
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 284
    Agentless
  • 210
    Great configuration
  • 199
    Simple
  • 176
    Powerful
  • 155
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 8
    Dangerous
  • 5
    Hard to install
  • 3
    Backward compatibility
  • 3
    Bloated
  • 3
    Doesn't Run on Windows
Pros
  • 16
    Real pipelines
  • 10
    Containerised builds
  • 9
    Flexible engine
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
Integrations
Nexmo
Nexmo
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Docker
Docker
OpenStack
OpenStack
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
New Relic
New Relic
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Ansible, Concourse?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana