Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ansible vs InSpec: What are the differences?
Introduction
In today's digital era, automation plays a pivotal role in managing and maintaining infrastructure. Two popular tools that are widely used for automation are Ansible and InSpec. While both Ansible and InSpec are used for infrastructure automation, there are significant differences between the two.
Language Ansible is written in Python, while InSpec is written in Ruby. This difference in programming languages can impact the ease of use and level of customization for users.
Configuration Management vs Compliance Testing One of the key differences between Ansible and InSpec is their primary focus. Ansible is mainly used as a configuration management tool, enabling administrators to define and manage the desired state of their infrastructure, while InSpec is primarily used for compliance testing, allowing users to assess whether their infrastructure meets certain security or regulatory standards.
Declarative vs Imperative Ansible follows a declarative approach, where users define the desired end state and the tool automatically handles the implementation. In contrast, InSpec follows an imperative approach, where users need to explicitly define each step in the testing process. This difference in approach can impact the learning curve and the complexity of writing automation scripts.
Agentless vs Agent-based Another significant difference between Ansible and InSpec is their approach to managing nodes. Ansible is an agentless tool, meaning it doesn't require any software to be installed on managed nodes. On the other hand, InSpec relies on agents that need to be installed and configured on each managed node. This can influence the ease of setup and the level of control over the managed nodes.
Scope of Automation Ansible is a versatile tool that can be used for a wide range of automation tasks, including configuration management, application deployment, and orchestration. In contrast, InSpec is primarily focused on compliance testing and reporting, with a narrower scope of automation.
Integration with CI/CD Ansible is often integrated into the CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) pipeline, facilitating the automation of infrastructure provisioning and configuration. InSpec, on the other hand, is commonly used for security and compliance testing within the CI/CD pipeline, ensuring the infrastructure meets the required standards.
In summary, Ansible and InSpec differ in terms of their language, focus, approach, node management, scope of automation, and integration with CI/CD. Ansible is a versatile configuration management tool, while InSpec is a compliance testing tool.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Ansible
- Agentless284
- Great configuration210
- Simple199
- Powerful176
- Easy to learn155
- Flexible69
- Doesn't get in the way of getting s--- done55
- Makes sense35
- Super efficient and flexible30
- Powerful27
- Dynamic Inventory11
- Backed by Red Hat9
- Works with AWS7
- Cloud Oriented6
- Easy to maintain6
- Vagrant provisioner4
- Simple and powerful4
- Multi language4
- Simple4
- Because SSH4
- Procedural or declarative, or both4
- Easy4
- Consistency3
- Well-documented2
- Masterless2
- Debugging is simple2
- Merge hash to get final configuration similar to hiera2
- Fast as hell2
- Manage any OS1
- Work on windows, but difficult to manage1
- Certified Content1
Pros of InSpec
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ansible
- Dangerous8
- Hard to install5
- Doesn't Run on Windows3
- Bloated3
- Backward compatibility3
- No immutable infrastructure2