StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. Ansible vs Portainer

Ansible vs Portainer

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ansible
Ansible
Stacks19.5K
Followers15.6K
Votes1.3K
GitHub Stars66.9K
Forks24.1K
Portainer
Portainer
Stacks507
Followers842
Votes146

Ansible vs Portainer: What are the differences?

1. Key Difference: Architecture Ansible is an agentless automation tool that uses a push model architecture, where commands are executed directly on the managed nodes from a control node. On the other hand, Portainer is a container management platform that utilizes a client-server communication model, where the Portainer server communicates with the Docker daemon on the managed nodes to perform actions.

2. Key Difference: Use Case Ansible is primarily designed for configuration management, application deployment, and task automation across multiple systems. It focuses on orchestration and streamlining the management of infrastructure and applications. In contrast, Portainer is more focused on container management and provides a user-friendly interface for managing Docker containers and clusters.

3. Key Difference: Learning Curve Ansible uses a declarative language called YAML (Yet Another Markup Language) for defining tasks and playbooks, which makes it relatively easy to learn and use. It has a shallow learning curve, allowing users to quickly start using Ansible for automation tasks. On the other hand, Portainer provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies Docker container management, making it more accessible to users who are not familiar with command-line tools.

4. Key Difference: Scalability Ansible is designed to scale efficiently and can handle managing thousands of nodes simultaneously. It achieves scalability by utilizing a decentralized architecture and leveraging SSH connections to manage the nodes. In contrast, Portainer's scalability is limited by the capacity of the underlying Docker engine. While it supports managing multiple Docker nodes, it may not be suitable for managing a large number of nodes or clusters.

5. Key Difference: Integration Ansible provides extensive integration capabilities with various systems and technologies, allowing users to automate tasks across different platforms. It supports integrations with cloud providers, network devices, databases, and more. Portainer, on the other hand, primarily focuses on Docker container management and may have limited integrations compared to Ansible.

6. Key Difference: Extensibility Ansible offers a wide range of built-in modules and plugins that allow users to extend its functionality. It also allows users to develop custom modules if needed, providing flexibility in automation tasks. Portainer, on the other hand, has a more limited set of features and extensions compared to Ansible, as it primarily focuses on Docker container management.

In Summary, Ansible and Portainer differ in their architecture, use case, learning curve, scalability, integration capabilities, and extensibility. While Ansible is a powerful automation tool for managing infrastructure and applications, Portainer is a user-friendly platform specifically designed for Docker container management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ansible, Portainer

Anonymous
Anonymous

Sep 17, 2019

Needs advice

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

329k views329k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ansible
Ansible
Portainer
Portainer

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.;Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.;Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.
Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
66.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
24.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
19.5K
Stacks
507
Followers
15.6K
Followers
842
Votes
1.3K
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 284
    Agentless
  • 210
    Great configuration
  • 199
    Simple
  • 176
    Powerful
  • 155
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 8
    Dangerous
  • 5
    Hard to install
  • 3
    Bloated
  • 3
    Backward compatibility
  • 3
    Doesn't Run on Windows
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Fully featured
Integrations
Nexmo
Nexmo
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Docker
Docker
OpenStack
OpenStack
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
New Relic
New Relic
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Ansible, Portainer?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana