Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Asana vs ZenHub: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Asana and ZenHub
Asana and ZenHub are both project management tools, but they have key differences in their features and functionality. Here are six specific differences between Asana and ZenHub:
Integration with External Tools: Asana allows users to integrate with a wide range of external tools such as Google Drive, Dropbox, and Slack, providing seamless collaboration. On the other hand, ZenHub integrates directly with GitHub, providing a more streamlined workflow specifically for software development projects.
Project Visualization: Asana offers a visually appealing user interface that emphasizes task management, calendars, and timelines, making it easier for teams to track progress and deadlines. In contrast, ZenHub focuses on providing a Kanban board that is directly integrated into GitHub, allowing teams to visualize and manage tasks within the context of their GitHub repositories.
Task Dependencies: Asana allows users to create dependencies between tasks, ensuring that tasks can only be started once their dependencies are completed. This feature enables better coordination and planning. However, ZenHub does not currently have built-in task dependency functionality, which may be a limitation for some teams.
Burndown Charts: ZenHub offers built-in burndown charts that provide insights into project progress and help identify potential bottlenecks. Asana, on the other hand, does not have native burndown chart functionality, requiring users to rely on third-party integrations or manual tracking to generate similar reports.
Pricing Structure: Asana offers a tiered pricing structure, with different pricing plans for individuals, teams, and enterprises. This allows users to choose a plan that best suits their needs and budget. ZenHub, on the other hand, follows a per-user pricing model, which may be more suitable for smaller teams but could be costlier for larger organizations.
Community and Support: Asana has a large, active community of users and offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and customer support resources to help users get the most out of the tool. ZenHub also has a supportive community, but it is more focused on software development and relies heavily on GitHub's existing user community for support and resources.
In Summary, Asana and ZenHub differ in their integration capabilities, project visualization, task dependency management, availability of burndown charts, pricing structure, and community support. Choosing between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of your team, as well as the nature of your projects.
I'm comparing Aha!, Trello and Asana. We are looking for it as a Product Management Team. Jira handles all our development and storyboard etc. This is for Product Management for Roadmaps, Backlogs, future stories, etc. Cost is a factor, as well. Does anyone have a comparison chart of Pros and Cons? Thank you.
I just switched to ClickUp for my development agency - I am the product team, and I relay everything there betwixt designers, devs, and clients.
Clickup = Jira + Confluence but better - more ways to slice and dice your data & documents, make custom views, mind map relationships, and track people's work, plan goals... I even use it to manage project finances and household to-dos.
They have a very comprehensive free tier that never expires, and on top of that they're extremely generous with trials of their paid features, have more-than-fair pricing, and top-notch customer support.
Both Asana and Trello support Kanban style project tracking. Trello is Kanban-only project management, knowledge management, actually card-management tools. Asana is much more complex, supports different project management approaches, well integrated and helpful for any style/type project.
We choose Asana finally, but still some projects kept in Trello
Procezo is an excellent free-for-life task managing tool with several benefits. Its clear, user-friendly interface is perfect for small businesses and startups as well as enterprise-level use. It makes it a seamless transition from any other project management tools. Its simple but effective layout allows new users to quickly adapt to its ever-expanding set of features. Procezo allows users to create boards and provide access to users or teams as required, set priority and precedence of the task and allowing for subtasks and discussions to be created. With unlimited tasks, users, projects and free support, Procezo is quickly making its way into businesses from across the world and the ultimate growth hack tool.
trello has a much simpler interface and easy to learn for any team member. asana might have more features and configuration options but do you really need a complex system for developers to manage tasks?
After Microsoft took over trello, it has become more restricted these days but still good for startups.
Keep it simple! Focus on your product, not tools.
Pros of Asana
- Super fast task creation160
- Flexible project management150
- Free up to 15101
- Followers and commenting on tasks99
- Integration with external services57
- Email-based task creation25
- Plays nice with Google Apps17
- Clear usage14
- Plays nice with Harvest Time Tracking14
- Supports nice keyboard shortcuts6
- Integration with GitHub4
- Slack supported2
- Integration with Instagantt for Gantt Charts2
- Integration with Alfred1
- Both Card View & Task View1
- Easy to use1
- Friendly API1
- Slick and fast interface0
Pros of ZenHub
- Don't have to leave github74
- No context switching, use github for everything53
- Fast and effective team support38
- Github integration36
- The board makes easier to prioritize33
- It's all about that +130
- Fair pricing model20
- Burndown charts right in github14
- Intuitive5
- Slack integration4
- Guidelines about Agile1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Asana
- Not Cross Platform0