Assertible vs Postman

Overview

Postman

Stacks96.1K

Followers82.5K

Votes1.8K

Forks0

Assertible

Stacks10

Followers21

Votes0

Assertible vs Postman: What are the differences?

Automation Testing: Assertible focuses on automated API testing while Postman supports both manual and automated API testing. Postman provides a user-friendly interface for manual testing, whereas Assertible excels in automated testing by enabling continuous integration and deployment workflows.
Time and Cost Efficiency: Assertible offers a free plan with limited features, making it a cost-effective option for small teams and individuals. In contrast, Postman's pricing plans cater to various organization sizes and provide advanced collaboration features, making it suitable for large teams with diverse testing needs.
Integration Capabilities: Postman offers a vast range of integrations with popular tools such as Jira, Slack, and GitHub, allowing seamless workflow integrations for teams. Assertible, on the other hand, focuses on essential integrations like webhooks and CI platforms to streamline the testing process.
User Interface: Postman boasts a more visually appealing and intuitive user interface, making it easier for users to navigate and utilize its features efficiently. Assertible's interface is more straightforward and minimalistic, catering primarily to users who prioritize functionality over design aesthetics.
Monitoring and Reporting: Assertible provides robust monitoring capabilities with real-time alerts and detailed reports on API performance and uptime. While Postman offers some monitoring features, it is more focused on the development and testing phases rather than ongoing monitoring and reporting.
Collaboration Features: Postman offers advanced collaboration features such as team workspaces, role-based access control, and shared environments to enhance teamwork and communication among team members. Assertible, although it supports collaboration, lacks the extensive collaboration features provided by Postman.

In Summary, Assertible is a specialized tool for automated API testing with a cost-effective approach, while Postman offers a comprehensive platform for both manual and automated testing with advanced collaboration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Postman, Assertible

Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

Reviewon

Postman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k

Comments

StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k

Comments

Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Postman	Assertible
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.	Reduce bugs in web applications by using Assertible to create an automated QA pipeline that helps you catch failures & ship code faster.
Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud	Integrate with your favorite tools; Automate your QA like a pro; Run the same tests on all environments
Statistics
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 96.1K	Stacks 10
Followers 82.5K	Followers 21
Votes 1.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 490 Easy to use 369 Great tool 276 Makes developing rest api's easy peasy 156 Easy setup, looks good 144 The best api workflow out there Cons 10 Stores credentials in HTTP 9 Bloated features and UI 8 Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens 7 Poor GraphQL support 5 Expensive	No community feedback yet
Integrations
HipChat Keen Slack Dropbox Datadog PagerDuty Bigpanda Microsoft Teams Newman VictorOps	Python Haskell

What are some alternatives to Postman, Assertible?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Related Comparisons

Assertible vs Postman: What are the differences?

Automation Testing: Assertible focuses on automated API testing while Postman supports both manual and automated API testing. Postman provides a user-friendly interface for manual testing, whereas Assertible excels in automated testing by enabling continuous integration and deployment workflows.
Time and Cost Efficiency: Assertible offers a free plan with limited features, making it a cost-effective option for small teams and individuals. In contrast, Postman's pricing plans cater to various organization sizes and provide advanced collaboration features, making it suitable for large teams with diverse testing needs.
Integration Capabilities: Postman offers a vast range of integrations with popular tools such as Jira, Slack, and GitHub, allowing seamless workflow integrations for teams. Assertible, on the other hand, focuses on essential integrations like webhooks and CI platforms to streamline the testing process.
User Interface: Postman boasts a more visually appealing and intuitive user interface, making it easier for users to navigate and utilize its features efficiently. Assertible's interface is more straightforward and minimalistic, catering primarily to users who prioritize functionality over design aesthetics.
Monitoring and Reporting: Assertible provides robust monitoring capabilities with real-time alerts and detailed reports on API performance and uptime. While Postman offers some monitoring features, it is more focused on the development and testing phases rather than ongoing monitoring and reporting.
Collaboration Features: Postman offers advanced collaboration features such as team workspaces, role-based access control, and shared environments to enhance teamwork and communication among team members. Assertible, although it supports collaboration, lacks the extensive collaboration features provided by Postman.

Assertible vs Postman

Overview