Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Auth0

1.3K
2.1K
+ 1
215
Devise

417
232
+ 1
56
Add tool

Auth0 vs Devise: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Auth0 and Devise, highlighting the key differences between these two authentication solutions.

  1. Integration flexibility: Auth0 provides a flexible integration with various programming languages, frameworks, and platforms, allowing developers to easily implement authentication across different technologies. On the other hand, Devise is mainly designed for Ruby on Rails applications, limiting its integration options to this specific framework.

  2. Authentication methods: Auth0 supports a wide range of authentication methods, including social login, passwordless authentication, multi-factor authentication, and more. Devise, on the other hand, primarily focuses on traditional email/password authentication, with limited built-in support for other methods. Additional functionality needs to be implemented manually in Devise.

  3. Scalability and performance: Auth0 is built to handle high-scale authentication requirements, providing a global infrastructure with multiple data centers. This ensures excellent performance and availability even under heavy loads. In contrast, Devise relies on the hosting infrastructure of the application it is integrated with, which might not be optimized for high scalability and performance.

  4. Security and compliance: Auth0 provides enterprise-grade security features, including secure token storage, encryption, threat monitoring, and compliance with industry standards like GDPR and SOC 2. Devise, while offering basic security measures, may require additional implementation to reach the same level of security and compliance.

  5. Third-party integrations: Auth0 offers extensive integrations with third-party services, such as identity providers and user management systems. This makes it easier to connect with existing systems and leverage their functionalities. Devise, on the other hand, might require more manual configuration and custom development to achieve similar integrations.

  6. Development speed and ease of use: Auth0 provides a comprehensive authentication-as-a-service solution with ready-to-use features, user interfaces, and SDKs. This allows developers to quickly implement authentication without spending much time on boilerplate code. Devise, while being a popular authentication solution for Ruby on Rails, requires more manual configuration and customization, which can slow down development speed.

In summary, Auth0 offers more integration flexibility, supports a wider range of authentication methods, provides better scalability, security, and compliance features, and offers easier third-party integrations compared to Devise. Auth0 also provides rapid development capabilities with ready-to-use features, while Devise requires more manual configuration and customization.

Advice on Auth0 and Devise

Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

See more
Replies (1)

Hey, we've had implemented Firebase auth in less than two days. Their doc is amazing and I don't understand why you think that it will take more effort than Auth0. Prices are really good (free, except if you use more than 10k/sms month).

See more

We need to migrate our authentication system to an external solution. We have a Vue.js frontend and a set of Services (mostly in Python) that talk to each other through APIs. This platform is multitenant, having all tenants in the same DB (MongoDB) and discriminating between them with a parameter value. So I'll be grateful if someone can share their experiences with any of these three options!

See more
Replies (1)
Micha Mailänder
CEO & Co-Founder at Dechea · | 4 upvotes · 87.1K views
Recommends
on
Auth0Auth0FaunaFauna
at

If these three are your options, I would recommend going with Auth0. They have all functionality available as developer API (Okta e.g. not) so you can manage your instance with Infrastructure as code and can also easily add functionalities relatively easily with the API. They are also really powerful if we're talking about ABAC (Attribute based access control). You can also enrich your access token with custom claims from your MongoDB, that can be probably really useful, as you said that you're dealing with multi tenancy.

We're using Auth0 in combination with Fauna Fauna is a database, so it would challenge you're mongodb. But Faunadb is the first database that implemented a full end user ABAC system directly in the database. (And also a lot easier than the ABAC systems from Okta or Auth0). This helps us, to use Auth0 only as identity platform and doing all the authorization with enriched claims over Fauna. With that you can skip in a lot of the cases you're backend, and you can request directly from the frontend your database (Blazing fast). Also, you can replace in some years Auth0 a lot easier with some upcoming cheaper (Auth0 was bought by Okta for a hilarious price) and "easy to use" passwordless identity provider like Passage.id

See more
Needs advice
on
Auth0Auth0
and
PassportPassport

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
Auth0Auth0

I would recommend Auth0 only if you are willing to shell out money. You can keep up with their free version only for a very limited time and as per our experience as a growing startup where budget is an issue, their support was not very helpful as they first asked us to sign a commercial agreement even before helping us t o find out whether Auth0 fits our use case or not! But otherwise Auth0 is a great platform to speed up authentication. In our case we had to move to alternatives like Casbin for multi-tenant authorization!

See more
Decisions about Auth0 and Devise
Ryan Wans

Using Auth0 and JWT with a simple session management server is easy and takes care of a lot of the hassle of setting up authentication. We feel safe having Auth0 handle and store our user data knowing their databases are way more secure than anything we could have setup ourselves. They also provide great tools like WebHooks and action events to pull critical metadata to our API when we need it.

See more
Brent Maxwell
Migrated
from
Amazon CognitoAmazon Cognito
to
Auth0Auth0

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Auth0
Pros of Devise
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
  • 11
    Heroku Add-on
  • 8
    Enterprise support
  • 7
    Great Sample Repos
  • 7
    Extend platform with "rules"
  • 4
    Azure Add-on
  • 3
    Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider
  • 3
    Passwordless
  • 2
    It can integrate seamlessly with firebase
  • 2
    Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support
  • 2
    Polished
  • 2
    On-premise deployment
  • 1
    Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance
  • 1
    MFA
  • 1
    Active Directory support
  • 1
    Springboot
  • 1
    SOC2
  • 1
    SAML Support
  • 1
    Great support
  • 1
    OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Auth0
Cons of Devise
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Auth0?

    A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

    What is Devise?

    Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Auth0?
    What companies use Devise?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Auth0?
    What tools integrate with Devise?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Sep 29 2020 at 7:36PM

    WorkOS

    PythonSlackG Suite+17
    6
    3158
    What are some alternatives to Auth0 and Devise?
    Stormpath
    Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.
    Amazon Cognito
    You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.
    Okta
    Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning.
    Firebase
    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
    Keycloak
    It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.
    See all alternatives