AWS CodeCommit vs RhodeCode: What are the differences?
Developers describe AWS CodeCommit as "Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories". CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools. On the other hand, RhodeCode is detailed as "Enterprise source code management platform for behind-the-firewall Mercurial, Git & Subversion. Secure and Open Source". RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night.
AWS CodeCommit and RhodeCode belong to "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:
- Access Control
On the other hand, RhodeCode provides the following key features:
- unified repository management across Mercurial, Git & SVN
- full-text source code search
- web-based code editor
"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider AWS CodeCommit over the competitors, whereas "Self hosted" was stated as the key factor in picking RhodeCode.
What is AWS CodeCommit?
What is RhodeCode?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to add, upvote and see more consMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
The pull requests are only merged by FF what makes all the merges hard to manage. The IAM configuration is very awkward and the unavailability to add git hooks to prevent commits to be made into the server makes this tool not much usable for a software development company.