Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit

135
129
+ 1
179
RhodeCode
RhodeCode

25
28
+ 1
208
Add tool

AWS CodeCommit vs RhodeCode: What are the differences?

Developers describe AWS CodeCommit as "Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories". CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools. On the other hand, RhodeCode is detailed as "Enterprise source code management platform for behind-the-firewall Mercurial, Git & Subversion. Secure and Open Source". RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night.

AWS CodeCommit and RhodeCode belong to "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

  • Collaboration
  • Encryption
  • Access Control

On the other hand, RhodeCode provides the following key features:

  • unified repository management across Mercurial, Git & SVN
  • full­-text source code search
  • web-­based code editor

"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider AWS CodeCommit over the competitors, whereas "Self hosted" was stated as the key factor in picking RhodeCode.

- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is AWS CodeCommit?

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

What is RhodeCode?

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose AWS CodeCommit?
Why do developers choose RhodeCode?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

Sign up to add, upvote and see more consMake informed product decisions

What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
What companies use RhodeCode?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
What tools integrate with RhodeCode?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit and RhodeCode?
GitHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
GitLab
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Bitbucket
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
SVN (Subversion)
Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
See all alternatives
Decisions about AWS CodeCommit and RhodeCode
No stack decisions found
Interest over time
Reviews of AWS CodeCommit and RhodeCode
Avatar of AnakinPt
Lead Engineer at Fineos
Review ofAWS CodeCommitAWS CodeCommit

The pull requests are only merged by FF what makes all the merges hard to manage. The IAM configuration is very awkward and the unavailability to add git hooks to prevent commits to be made into the server makes this tool not much usable for a software development company.

How developers use AWS CodeCommit and RhodeCode
Avatar of Volkan Özçelik
Volkan Özçelik uses AWS CodeCommitAWS CodeCommit

I use CodeCommit for projects that require a tighter integration with the AWS ecosystem.

Otherwise, my default source control system as a service of choice is: GitHub.

How much does AWS CodeCommit cost?
How much does RhodeCode cost?
News about AWS CodeCommit
More news
News about RhodeCode
More news