AWS CodePipeline vs CircleCI

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

AWS CodePipeline

Stacks551

Followers933

Votes30

AWS CodePipeline vs CircleCI: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this markdown code, I will provide the key differences between AWS CodePipeline and CircleCI.

Deployment Environments: AWS CodePipeline provides a wide range of deployment environments, including Amazon EC2 instances, AWS Lambda, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, and many others. On the other hand, CircleCI focuses primarily on supporting deployment to cloud platforms such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure but does not provide as many deployment options as CodePipeline.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodePipeline is deeply integrated with other AWS services like AWS CloudFormation, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, AWS CodeCommit, and Amazon S3. This seamless integration allows for easy configuration and interaction between these services. CircleCI, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with AWS services and relies more on custom configurations for integration.
Pipeline Configuration: CodePipeline offers a visual interface for creating and managing pipelines, allowing users to easily define the workflow and stages of their release process. CircleCI, on the other hand, relies on YAML configuration files for defining the pipeline configuration. While YAML files provide flexibility and version control for the pipeline configuration, they may require more coding knowledge and effort to set up.
Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged for the number of active pipelines and the execution time of each pipeline. CircleCI, on the other hand, offers different pricing tiers based on the number of concurrent builds and additional features required. The pricing structure of CircleCI may be more suitable for smaller projects with limited resources.
Scalability: AWS CodePipeline scales automatically based on the workload and demand, ensuring fast and reliable deployment processes. CircleCI also offers scalability options but may require manual configuration and optimization to handle larger workloads efficiently. CodePipeline's scalability capabilities make it a preferred choice for enterprises with complex deployment requirements.
Advanced Features: AWS CodePipeline offers advanced features like manual approvals, deployment notifications, and the ability to run custom actions. These features provide more control and flexibility in the deployment process. While CircleCI supports some similar features like notifications, it may not have the same level of customization and control as CodePipeline.

In summary, AWS CodePipeline provides a broader range of deployment options, deeper integration with AWS services, visual pipeline configuration, and advanced features. CircleCI focuses more on cloud platform deployments, has a different pricing model, and requires YAML configuration files for pipeline setup.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CircleCI, AWS CodePipeline

Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

Reviewon

CircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	AWS CodePipeline
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
Statistics
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 551
Followers 7.1K	Followers 933
Votes 974	Votes 30
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 13 Simple to set up 8 Managed service 4 GitHub integration 3 Parallel Execution 2 Automatic deployment Cons 2 No project boards 1 No integration with "Power" 365 tools
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	Runscope Amazon S3 GitHub Jenkins CloudBees BlazeMeter Ghost Inspector AWS Elastic Beanstalk Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, AWS CodePipeline?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodePipeline vs CircleCI: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this markdown code, I will provide the key differences between AWS CodePipeline and CircleCI.

Deployment Environments: AWS CodePipeline provides a wide range of deployment environments, including Amazon EC2 instances, AWS Lambda, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, and many others. On the other hand, CircleCI focuses primarily on supporting deployment to cloud platforms such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure but does not provide as many deployment options as CodePipeline.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodePipeline is deeply integrated with other AWS services like AWS CloudFormation, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, AWS CodeCommit, and Amazon S3. This seamless integration allows for easy configuration and interaction between these services. CircleCI, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with AWS services and relies more on custom configurations for integration.
Pipeline Configuration: CodePipeline offers a visual interface for creating and managing pipelines, allowing users to easily define the workflow and stages of their release process. CircleCI, on the other hand, relies on YAML configuration files for defining the pipeline configuration. While YAML files provide flexibility and version control for the pipeline configuration, they may require more coding knowledge and effort to set up.
Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged for the number of active pipelines and the execution time of each pipeline. CircleCI, on the other hand, offers different pricing tiers based on the number of concurrent builds and additional features required. The pricing structure of CircleCI may be more suitable for smaller projects with limited resources.
Scalability: AWS CodePipeline scales automatically based on the workload and demand, ensuring fast and reliable deployment processes. CircleCI also offers scalability options but may require manual configuration and optimization to handle larger workloads efficiently. CodePipeline's scalability capabilities make it a preferred choice for enterprises with complex deployment requirements.
Advanced Features: AWS CodePipeline offers advanced features like manual approvals, deployment notifications, and the ability to run custom actions. These features provide more control and flexibility in the deployment process. While CircleCI supports some similar features like notifications, it may not have the same level of customization and control as CodePipeline.

AWS CodePipeline vs CircleCI

Overview