StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. AWS CodePipeline vs GitHub Enterprise

AWS CodePipeline vs GitHub Enterprise

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Stacks551
Followers933
Votes30

AWS CodePipeline vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Integration: AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous integration and delivery service, whereas GitHub Enterprise provides self-hosted services for source code management. CodePipeline integrates seamlessly with various AWS services, such as AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodeDeploy, while GitHub Enterprise allows organizations to host their code on their servers but lacks direct integration with AWS services.

  2. Scalability: AWS CodePipeline offers scalability by allowing users to scale up or down depending on their project requirements and size. On the other hand, GitHub Enterprise scalability relies on the resources allocated by the organization in terms of server capacity and storage, which may be limited compared to AWS's cloud infrastructure.

  3. Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline operates on a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on their actual usage of the service. GitHub Enterprise, on the other hand, requires organizations to pay a fixed license fee for a specific number of users, which may not be cost-effective for smaller teams or projects.

  4. Managed Services: AWS CodePipeline provides a fully managed environment where AWS takes care of maintenance, updates, and infrastructure, reducing the burden on the user. GitHub Enterprise requires organizations to manage their own servers, perform updates, and ensure the security and availability of the platform, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.

  5. Customization Options: AWS CodePipeline offers limited customization options compared to GitHub Enterprise, which allows organizations to tailor the platform to their specific needs and requirements. GitHub Enterprise provides greater control over configurations, permissions, and security settings, empowering organizations to create a tailored development environment.

  6. Community Support: GitHub Enterprise has a vibrant community of developers and open-source projects, providing users with access to a wealth of resources, plugins, and extensions. In contrast, AWS CodePipeline's community support is primarily focused on AWS services, with limited resources available for general development or troubleshooting.

In Summary, AWS CodePipeline and GitHub Enterprise differ in terms of integration, scalability, pricing model, managed services, customization options, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
Statistics
Stacks
500
Stacks
551
Followers
627
Followers
933
Votes
10
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 2
    Code security
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Pros
  • 13
    Simple to set up
  • 8
    Managed service
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 3
    Parallel Execution
  • 2
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 2
    No project boards
  • 1
    No integration with "Power" 365 tools
Integrations
No integrations available
Runscope
Runscope
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
CloudBees
CloudBees
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to GitHub Enterprise, AWS CodePipeline?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana