Azure DevOps vs Travis CI: What are the differences?
Introduction
Azure DevOps and Travis CI are two popular tools used for continuous integration and deployment in software development. While both aim to streamline the software development process, there are several key differences between the two.
Integration with Platforms: Azure DevOps provides seamless integration with Microsoft platforms such as Visual Studio, Azure, and GitHub. It offers a comprehensive set of tools that cover the entire software development lifecycle. On the other hand, Travis CI is platform-agnostic and can be easily integrated with various platforms such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. It provides a simpler and lightweight CI/CD solution compared to Azure DevOps.
Hosted vs Self-hosted: Azure DevOps is a hosted service provided by Microsoft, which means that the infrastructure and maintenance are taken care of by Microsoft. Organizations using Azure DevOps do not need to worry about setting up and managing their own infrastructure. In contrast, Travis CI can be self-hosted on the organization's infrastructure, giving organizations more control and flexibility over their CI/CD process.
Configuration and Customization: Azure DevOps offers a highly customizable and extensible platform. It provides a wide range of options for configuring build pipelines and release workflows, allowing teams to tailor the CI/CD process to their specific requirements. On the other hand, Travis CI follows a configuration-based approach, where developers define the build and deployment steps using a configuration file. This makes it less flexible compared to Azure DevOps.
Pricing Model: Azure DevOps offers a tiered pricing model based on the number of users and features. It has a free tier for small teams and startups, and paid plans for larger organizations with advanced features. In contrast, Travis CI offers a different pricing model based on usage minutes and concurrent builds. It provides a certain number of free minutes per month, and organizations can buy additional minutes as per their requirements. The pricing model of Travis CI is more focused on usage, making it suitable for projects with varying build needs.
Community and Ecosystem: Azure DevOps has a larger community and ecosystem due to its association with Microsoft. It has extensive documentation, online resources, and a wide range of integrations with third-party tools. This makes it easier for developers to find support and resources when using Azure DevOps. While Travis CI also has a community and ecosystem, it is relatively smaller compared to Azure DevOps.
Additional Features: Azure DevOps provides additional features beyond just CI/CD. It offers project management tools, version control systems, and test planning capabilities. This makes it a comprehensive solution for end-to-end software development. Travis CI, on the other hand, primarily focuses on CI/CD and does not provide extensive project management or version control capabilities.
In summary, Azure DevOps offers a more integrated and comprehensive solution with deep integration with Microsoft platforms, while Travis CI provides a lightweight, platform-agnostic CI/CD solution with more customization options and a different pricing model.
Share your Stack
Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.
My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.
From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"
Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.
CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible.
Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.
And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.
Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.
Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
Easy Setup- Getting started with Travis CI is as easy as enabling a project, adding basic build instructions to your project and committing code.;Supports Your Platform- Lots of databases and services are pre-installed and can simply be enabled in your build configuration, we'll launch them for you automatically. MySQL, PostgreSQL, ElasticSearch, Redis, Riak, RabbitMQ, Memcached are available by default.;Deploy With Confidence- Deploying to production after a successful build is as easy as setting up a bit of configuration, and we'll deploy your code to Heroku, Engine Yard Cloud, Nodejitsu, cloudControl, OpenShift, and CloudFoundry.
Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards;
Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI;
Git: free private repositories, pull requests;
Continuous Integration: automated builds and diagnostics;
Cloud build agents: cross-platform agents for Windows, Mac and Linux;
Testing Tools: unit testing, load testing, manual, exploratory and user acceptance testing;
Release Management: automate deployments, gated approval workflows, audit trails;
Marketplace: extensions for the Visual Studio family of products;
Package Management: host npm and NuGet packages;
IDE Support: Eclipse, IntelliJ, Xcode and Visual Studio;
Integration: link code and releases to work items, builds, and test results
