StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bamboo vs GoCD

Bamboo vs GoCD

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17
GoCD
GoCD
Stacks205
Followers325
Votes207
GitHub Stars7.3K
Forks980

Bamboo vs GoCD: What are the differences?

<Introduction: Bamboo and GoCD are two popular continuous integration and delivery tools used by software development teams to automate the process of building, testing, and deploying code.>

  1. Pipeline Configuration: Bamboo follows a more visual approach where users can create build plans using a drag-and-drop interface, while GoCD relies on configuration as code, allowing users to define pipeline configurations in a version-controlled file.

  2. Plugins and Integrations: Bamboo offers a wide range of third-party plugins to extend its functionality, whereas GoCD has a more limited selection of plugins but provides robust integrations with popular tools like Docker and Kubernetes.

  3. Scalability and Flexibility: GoCD is known for its scalability and flexibility, allowing users to customize complex workflows and scale their CI/CD processes with ease, while Bamboo is better suited for smaller projects and teams.

  4. Support for Distributed Builds: GoCD excels in supporting distributed builds across multiple agents and environments, making it ideal for large-scale projects, while Bamboo may encounter limitations in managing distributed builds efficiently.

  5. Monitoring and Visibility: GoCD provides comprehensive monitoring and visualization tools to track the status of each pipeline stage in real-time, offering better visibility into the CI/CD process compared to Bamboo.

  6. Community and Support: While Bamboo offers better documentation and official support from Atlassian, GoCD has a strong open-source community backing it up, providing more community-based support and resources for users.

In Summary, Bamboo and GoCD differ in pipeline configuration, plugins and integrations, scalability, distributed builds, monitoring, and community support, catering to different needs of software development teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bamboo, GoCD

Mohammad Hossein
Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonDockerDocker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo
Bamboo
GoCD
GoCD

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

-
Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
7.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
980
Stacks
504
Stacks
205
Followers
549
Followers
325
Votes
17
Votes
207
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
  • 1
    Bad UI
  • 1
    Low community support
Pros
  • 32
    Open source
  • 27
    Pipeline dependencies
  • 25
    Pipeline structures
  • 22
    Can run jobs in parallel
  • 20
    Very flexible
Cons
  • 2
    Lack of plugins
  • 2
    Horrible ui
  • 1
    No support
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, GoCD?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana