StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Beanstalk vs Octopus Deploy

Beanstalk vs Octopus Deploy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Beanstalk
Beanstalk
Stacks85
Followers270
Votes51
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Stacks407
Followers493
Votes118

Beanstalk vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

Introduction

Beanstalk and Octopus Deploy are both popular tools used for deploying and managing applications. While they share some similarities, there are also key differences between the two. In this article, we will highlight and explore the main differences between Beanstalk and Octopus Deploy.

  1. Scalability: Beanstalk is a scalable solution that can handle projects of all sizes, from small startups to large enterprises. It offers flexible pricing options based on the number of repositories and users. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy is designed for scalability as well, but it excels in managing complex deployments and orchestrating multiple environments and targets.

  2. Deployment Automation: Beanstalk focuses more on simplicity and ease of use, providing a streamlined deployment process. It offers an intuitive interface and a straightforward setup, making it easy for teams to quickly release code changes. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, takes deployment automation to another level. It has advanced features like deployment channels, deployment approvals, and release management, allowing organizations to implement complex deployment strategies.

  3. Integration and Extensibility: Beanstalk provides integrations with popular tools like Slack and HipChat, which enhances team collaboration and communication during the deployment process. However, Octopus Deploy offers a wide range of integrations and extensions, including build servers, issue trackers, and cloud platforms. This enables seamless integration with existing development and operation workflows, making it more suitable for organizations with complex infrastructures.

  4. Deployment Targets: Beanstalk primarily focuses on deploying to cloud-based hosting providers like AWS, DigitalOcean, and Azure. It simplifies the process of setting up and managing deployments to these platforms. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, supports both cloud-based and on-premises deployment targets. It allows organizations to deploy their applications to a variety of environments, including servers, virtual machines, containers, and cloud providers.

  5. Release Management and Versioning: With Beanstalk, the focus is on code version control and collaboration within a development team. It provides version control features like tagging, commenting, and comparing changes. While Octopus Deploy also offers version control capabilities, it goes beyond that by providing release management features such as versioning, release notes, and rollback options. It enables organizations to manage and track their releases across multiple environments and ensure a smooth deployment process.

  6. DevOps Focus: Beanstalk is primarily aimed at developers and focuses on simplifying the deployment process. It provides a user-friendly interface and a straightforward setup, allowing developers to quickly get their code into production. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is designed for both developers and operations teams. It emphasizes collaboration and automation between development and operations, enabling organizations to embrace DevOps practices and accelerate their delivery cycles.

In Summary, Beanstalk and Octopus Deploy have distinct differences in terms of scalability, deployment automation, integration and extensibility, deployment targets, release management and versioning, and their focus within a DevOps context. These differences make them suitable for different types of organizations and deployment requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Beanstalk
Beanstalk
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Setup and manage repositories- Import or create Subversion and Git repositories that are instantly available to your team.;Invite team members, partners & clients- Restrict access to certain repos and provide read-only or full read/write permissions.;Browse files and changes- Every version of every file you’ve committed to Beanstalk is just a click away. See a timeline of who made changes and view the differences between revisions. Syntax highlighting for over 70 languages.;Preview, Compare & Share- Instantly preview HTML and image files in Beanstalk, compare versions side by side, and share them with your team, colleagues or clients, even if they don’t have a Beanstalk account.;Code Editing- Make and commit changes directly in the web interface of Beanstalk.;Blame Tool- View the line-by-line history of every file using Beanstalk's blame tool. Quickly see who was responsible for each line of code and which revision it belonged to.;Instantly deploy static assets from Beanstalk to your development, staging and production servers via Amazon S3, Rackspace Cloud Files, Heroku, DreamObjects;
Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Statistics
Stacks
85
Stacks
407
Followers
270
Followers
493
Votes
51
Votes
118
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Ftp deploy
  • 9
    Deployment
  • 8
    Easy to navigate
  • 4
    HipChat Integration
  • 4
    Integrations
Pros
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
Cons
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
  • 2
    Management of Config
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Basecamp
Basecamp
Campfire
Campfire
FogBugz
FogBugz
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Harvest
Harvest
Zendesk
Zendesk
HipChat
HipChat
Bugify
Bugify
Jenkins
Jenkins
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jira
Jira
Appveyor
Appveyor
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Beanstalk, Octopus Deploy?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana