Bitbucket vs SVN (Subversion)

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

SVN (Subversion)

Stacks791

Followers629

Votes43

GitHub Stars614

Forks188

Bitbucket vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?

Bitbucket and SVN (Subversion) are version control systems used to manage source code and track changes in software development projects. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Version Control System: Bitbucket is a distributed version control system (DVCS) that allows developers to work both offline and online, making it easier to collaborate with teams. On the other hand, SVN is a centralized version control system (CVCS) that requires a centralized server for project collaboration.
Branching and Merging: Bitbucket provides a more streamlined and efficient branching and merging process. It allows developers to create lightweight branches, easily switch between branches, and merge changes with minimal conflicts. In contrast, SVN has a more complex and time-consuming branching and merging process, often leading to conflicts and difficulties in tracking changes.
Code Access and Collaboration: Bitbucket offers access controls for both individual users and teams, enabling fine-grained permission settings to control who can view, edit, and approve code. It also provides features like pull requests and code review, facilitating collaboration within the development team. SVN, on the other hand, has fewer options for code access control and lacks collaboration features, making it less suitable for large-scale projects with distributed teams.
Support for Large Files: Bitbucket has built-in support for large file storage, allowing developers to manage and version large binary files seamlessly. SVN, on the other hand, does not natively handle large files efficiently, which can lead to challenges in team collaboration, especially when dealing with multimedia files or complex design assets.
Integration and Ecosystem: Bitbucket has a comprehensive ecosystem and seamless integration with various development tools, including CI/CD platforms like Jenkins and popular project management tools like Jira. It provides built-in integrations for a smoother development workflow. On the contrary, SVN has limited ecosystem support and integration options, which can hinder the overall productivity and efficiency of the development process.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Bitbucket offers a user-friendly interface and intuitive commands, making it easier for developers to learn and adapt. It provides a smoother onboarding experience for new team members. In contrast, SVN has a steeper learning curve, as it requires familiarity with command-line operations and an understanding of its unique terminology.

In summary, Bitbucket provides a more modern, distributed, and user-friendly approach to version control, with efficient branching, collaboration features, and integrations, while SVN is a centralized system with a steeper learning curve, fewer collaboration capabilities, and limited ecosystem support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, SVN (Subversion)

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	SVN (Subversion)
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 614
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 188
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 791
Followers 33.4K	Followers 629
Votes 2.8K	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 20 Easy to use 13 Simple code versioning 5 User/Access Management 3 Complicated code versionioning by Subversion 2 Free Cons 7 Branching and tagging use tons of disk space
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, SVN (Subversion)?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?

Bitbucket and SVN (Subversion) are version control systems used to manage source code and track changes in software development projects. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Version Control System: Bitbucket is a distributed version control system (DVCS) that allows developers to work both offline and online, making it easier to collaborate with teams. On the other hand, SVN is a centralized version control system (CVCS) that requires a centralized server for project collaboration.
Branching and Merging: Bitbucket provides a more streamlined and efficient branching and merging process. It allows developers to create lightweight branches, easily switch between branches, and merge changes with minimal conflicts. In contrast, SVN has a more complex and time-consuming branching and merging process, often leading to conflicts and difficulties in tracking changes.
Code Access and Collaboration: Bitbucket offers access controls for both individual users and teams, enabling fine-grained permission settings to control who can view, edit, and approve code. It also provides features like pull requests and code review, facilitating collaboration within the development team. SVN, on the other hand, has fewer options for code access control and lacks collaboration features, making it less suitable for large-scale projects with distributed teams.
Support for Large Files: Bitbucket has built-in support for large file storage, allowing developers to manage and version large binary files seamlessly. SVN, on the other hand, does not natively handle large files efficiently, which can lead to challenges in team collaboration, especially when dealing with multimedia files or complex design assets.
Integration and Ecosystem: Bitbucket has a comprehensive ecosystem and seamless integration with various development tools, including CI/CD platforms like Jenkins and popular project management tools like Jira. It provides built-in integrations for a smoother development workflow. On the contrary, SVN has limited ecosystem support and integration options, which can hinder the overall productivity and efficiency of the development process.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Bitbucket offers a user-friendly interface and intuitive commands, making it easier for developers to learn and adapt. It provides a smoother onboarding experience for new team members. In contrast, SVN has a steeper learning curve, as it requires familiarity with command-line operations and an understanding of its unique terminology.

Bitbucket vs SVN (Subversion)

Overview